I've been clamoring for Jackson to be cut for two years now. I don't know why so many Packers fans are enamored of him. He may be able to pick up blitzes and catch out of the backfield, but he is useless in the run game.

---

Kuhn + Sitton = Pushing game

Not pretty but it works. (rather well)

---

Kuhn isn't pretty but I think it's fairly obvious that he's a better option than B jack. On another note....where is Nance?

---

took Ryan a few games to get in too

Good question. Last week one of the GBPG reporters mentioned that Nance was having a hard time learning the offense. Maybe that had something to do with his lack of playing time today.

---

We need a RB T.T. make it a trade for the sake of the potential glory season.

---

Starks has been studying the Offense since the beginning of OTAs. He will have a huge advantage over any one they bring in. He played QB in high school so he should be pretty bright.

---

The RB isn't going to make or break the glory season. I think special teams has made it clear the fate of this season rests in their hands.

---

Of course it's not that is why I clearly said potential glory season, all tho it can help us a lot. Assuming we actually had a running game, I'm sure minimum 1 of the INT's of this game wouldn't happen.

If we had an actual running game, we could of ran the ball in the bears game more, running off the clock and actually giving us a better chance to win the ball game.

We won against the Lions by two points, we're a one dimensional team. We're lucky that the defense stepped up or else we we're going to lose. It's really easy to stop a one dimensional team, if the opposing team is caling 90% pass then what do you do?

A running game is very important not only for clock management but also for your pass game. I can assure you if we had Grant or an actual running game Aaron Rodgers would be posting much better numbers due to the opposing team defense plays and them not actually knowing what we're going to do.

---

Damn. Sure have a lot of confidence in Starks, don't you? Not quite sure why.