K_Buz
  • K_Buz
  • Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Ok, I'll start off by saying that I know this has been talked about before, but I'm going to give my take.

I think McCarthy is a decent head coach, but doesn't have what it takes to get us to the promised land. The Packers have talent on their roster and that is what is carrying the team in spite of McCarthy. I can't remember one ballsy coaching decision that changed the outcome or momentum of the game.

However, I can remember numerous times where I shook my head saying,"WTF was he thinking." The end of the Bears game is the perfect example. Not letting the Bears score and allowing the Bears to run time off the clock. I don't think too many here support that call.

He can't win the big game. We lost twice last year to the Vikes. We embarrass the Cardinals in a meaningless game, then give up 50 the following week against the same team in a game that matters. We lose to the Bears in a game we could/should have won and take a commanding lead in the division. Time after time, we come out flat and make games closer than they need to be. The team seems to be missing the killer instinct. Score that TD that will seal the game instead of trying to run out the clock to hold on.

The penalties, my god, the penalties. I'm hoping last week was an exception this year, but after leading the league last year I have to put this on the list. Today's game against the Lions is a good sign that the penalty situation is under control.

Why the hell can't we find players to make plays on special teams? Why the hell can't we find a coach to make players make plays on special teams? I know coaches can only do so much then its up to the players, but lots of other teams have found people to be at least average on special teams. I'm sure the right people, whether it be coaches, or players we need to find these guys.

I'm sure some will come up with specific examples where my theory is off, like beating the Bills handily, or going into Philly and getting a win (both of which gave me hope about this year being different). But after watching the last two games, the same old tendencies are showing thru.

With all the talent on this team, Rodgers, Driver, Jennings, Finley, Matthews, Raji, Woodson the players can carry the team to wins against bad teams. These same players need the coaches to coach the rest of the team to win the big games...games against the Vikings, Bears, Jets, Patriots, Cowboys, Falcons, and Giants.

If this team doesn't make it deep in the playoffs, you will hear me screaming for heads all the way from SE Wisconsin.
go.pack.go.
14 years ago
Well the play that I think about when you say he doesn't make gutsy calls is the onside kick against the Cardinals in the playoffs.

And yes I do believe he can take us to promise land. I hate how some fans blame everything on McCarthy when it's really not his fault. And I really don't think he's a bad play caller. I love how he has developed Rodgers, and he and Rodgers seem like they're on the same page, which is great to have. I don't want us to lose McCarthy because that would almost be comparable to losing Rodgers himself IMO.
UserPostedImage
bigfog
14 years ago
I don't think you'll be the only one out for blood if the team falls apart down the stretch.

What bothers me the most is that under Mike, the team just plays lip service to the run game. If Green Bay had at least an average running game combined with Rodgers and Co., they'd be damn unstoppable. But no, there's no commitment to the run, no creativity by Mike to try something new on the run game, nothing. And it's not just this year, it's been like that since he's been the coach of the Green 'n Gold.

Pisses me off to no end. Yes, this is a passing league. But you have to have at least an average run game to have some sort of success.

Right now, I have to admit the future is cloudy for McCarthy. And I guess by extension, Thompson.
"I wouldn't root for the Minnesota Vikings to win a chess match against Nazi Germany."
Greg C.
14 years ago
The knock on every coach is that he doesn't have what it takes to win a championship--until he actually wins one. Meanwhile, the number of Super Bowl winning coaches who have been hired by other teams and then won another Super Bowl remains at zero. And there have been plenty of them.

As for winning big games, I hear that knock against a lot of coaches too. Unless they win a championship, there is no end to that kind of talk, because people just keep redefining the meaning of "big game." If you do that, you can ignore games like the season-opening wins against the Vikings in '08 and the Bears in '09, or last year's wins against the Cowboys and Ravens. Or the playoff win against Seattle in January '08. There are several others I could mention.

Going into last season, McCarthy's track record was very similar to Sean Payton's, then Payton won a Super Bowl. We don't know if McCarthy can do that, but unless the Packers have a really disappointing season, he's earned the right to coach the team for at least one more year. In the end, the win-loss record will tell the tale, especially the playoff record.
blank
go.pack.go.
14 years ago
Yea I agree with Greg that people ignore the big games that we DO win. Then those same people complain about the ones we lose.

It's not right.
UserPostedImage
evad04
14 years ago

I don't think you'll be the only one out for blood if the team falls apart down the stretch.

What bothers me the most is that under Mike, the team just plays lip service to the run game. If Green Bay had at least an average running game combined with Rodgers and Co., they'd be damn unstoppable. But no, there's no commitment to the run, no creativity by Mike to try something new on the run game, nothing. And it's not just this year, it's been like that since he's been the coach of the Green 'n Gold.

Pisses me off to no end. Yes, this is a passing league. But you have to have at least an average run game to have some sort of success.

Right now, I have to admit the future is cloudy for McCarthy. And I guess by extension, Thompson.

"bigfog" wrote:


We were 15th in rushing attempts and 14th in rushing yards in 2009.

In 2008 that was 14th and 17th, respectively.

In 2007 28th in attempts, 21st in yards (didn't have a starter locked down until Grant usurped the job halfway through the year).

Oh, and every single one of these offenses was TOP 5 IN POINTS.

Sheesh. Some coaches get no respect.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

I don't think you'll be the only one out for blood if the team falls apart down the stretch.

What bothers me the most is that under Mike, the team just plays lip service to the run game. If Green Bay had at least an average running game combined with Rodgers and Co., they'd be damn unstoppable. But no, there's no commitment to the run, no creativity by Mike to try something new on the run game, nothing. And it's not just this year, it's been like that since he's been the coach of the Green 'n Gold.

Pisses me off to no end. Yes, this is a passing league. But you have to have at least an average run game to have some sort of success.

Right now, I have to admit the future is cloudy for McCarthy. And I guess by extension, Thompson.

"evad04" wrote:




We were 15th in rushing attempts and 14th in rushing yards in 2009.

In 2008 that was 14th and 17th, respectively.

In 2007 28th in attempts, 21st in yards (didn't have a starter locked down until Grant usurped the job halfway through the year).

Oh, and every single one of these offenses was TOP 5 IN POINTS.

Sheesh. Some coaches get no respect.

"bigfog" wrote:



Thank you...I was beginning to think I was the only McCarthy supporter here.
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
14 years ago
I think we were in a spot to get to the SB in 07, were we not?

And Mike was coach then was he not?


In 08 I think was a off year


Last year we made the playoff, but few freak things and we lost

He can get us there
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

I think we were in a spot to get to the SB in 07, were we not?

And Mike was coach then was he not?


In 08 I think was a off year


Last year we made the playoff, but few freak things and we lost

He can get us there

"longtimefan" wrote:



Agreed.
UserPostedImage
rabidgopher04
14 years ago
Didn't it take Dungy 8-10 years to get to the Super Bowl? Wasn't there about 11 years between Super Bowl appearances for Cowher (only winning the second one)? Let's give the man some more time.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (1h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (1h) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (2h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (2h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (2h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (3h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (3h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (3h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (3h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (3h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (3h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (3h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (5h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (5h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (5h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.