Hawk and Poppinga· Page 3

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

They're on the team because they guys that got cut weren't better than them. It's simple... keep the best 53 guys (and some times you have to get so many at one position)

Que my rant now.. next up is W.Moss.. lol.

"pack93z" wrote:

Has anyone gotten better under Moss's coaching? ... Poppinga did get better in coverage than he was while under Moss but I can't say any of the LBers have gotten better under Moss other than that.

(and before someone says Matthews, Jones and Zombo they're under the coaching of coach Greene)

But Hawk, Biship, Barnett and Chillar haven't really improved. Now sure if he's coaching or they just ran out of potential.

I am a bit surprised the Packers kept ILB Maurice Simpkins on the PS over ILB Alex Joseph on the PS. I thought Joseph looked like he had more potential and was younger.

Finley88Beast
Registered

14 years ago

#22

I am a bit surprised the Packers kept ILB Maurice Simpkins on the PS over ILB Alex Joseph on the PS. I thought Joseph looked like he had more potential and was younger.

"beast" wrote:

Lol i think it had to do something becuase he was 2nd in tackles in the preseason but i hardly think thats the reason.
heres some stats:
Maurice Simpkins 13 tackles 12 total tackles 1 assist tackle
Alex Joseph 6 tackles 5 total tackles 1 assist tackle
Idk if this would have a reason to him making the squad but im not a coach so I dont know how they evaluate them.

A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

#23

I am a bit surprised the Packers kept ILB Maurice Simpkins on the PS over ILB Alex Joseph on the PS. I thought Joseph looked like he had more potential and was younger.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

"beast" wrote:

I think Joseph was banged up for a while but the kid could serious fly... got to the far sideline faster than Simpkins got to to close sideline.

But maybe he wasn't a football guy.... but he was a pretty good athlete.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#24

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#25

Here we go with another thread hating on Hawk....unbelievable.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#26

Que my rant now.. next up is W.Moss.. lol.

"pack93z" wrote:

Winston Moss praised Hawk and said he is judged unfairly when it comes to production, pointing out he recorded a minimum of 121 tackles in his first three seasons. At the same time, the Packers will continue to match up with teams and Moss said the development of Chillar and Desmond Bishop gives them more flexibility in those subpackages.

British
Registered

14 years ago

#27

The interesting thing will be next season. No way do the Packers bring him back at $10m for the season. So he gets cut or redone. But will he want to be redone on starters money? Or as a situational run stuffer who is more and more sidelined as the NFL becomes ever more a pass first league?

The annoying thing about his contract is that if we cant come to a deal and are forced to cut him we get no compensation. If he left as a free agent we would at least get a draft pick.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#28

Your Caveman Rodgers sig is hilarious, British!

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#29

Here we go with another thread hating on Hawk....unbelievable.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

You're right man, I should have left identy away from subject title and called it "Overhyped College Players get wealthy off Packer fans while riding the pine".

I actually like Hawk, but if Chiller plays ahead of him, he needs to take a pay cut.

And this topic is warranted.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#30

Here we go with another thread hating on Hawk....unbelievable.

"DakotaT" wrote:

"go.pack.go." wrote:

But how many threads have we had that say the same exact thing?

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (19h) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22