dyeah_gb
14 years ago
Here is an interesting article about the most indispensable player on each team. It is unclear what they mean by indispensable but think they mean the best #2 on the team. Given this assumption, I notice they pick Woodson as our #2 as well as scouts Inc. Here is the article

http://1057thefan.cbslocal.com/2010/08/27/most-indispensable-nfc-north/ 


In terms of last year I agree with this hands down. If I was going to forecast for this year, I am betting on Finley. It is funny for the Vikings that neither of them pick Brent.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
beast
14 years ago

Here is an interesting article about the most indispensable player on each team. It is unclear what they mean by indispensable but think they mean the best #2 on the team. Given this assumption, I notice they pick Woodson as our #2 as well as scouts Inc. Here is the article

http://1057thefan.cbslocal.com/2010/08/27/most-indispensable-nfc-north/ 


In terms of last year I agree with this hands down. If I was going to forecast for this year, I am betting on Finley. It is funny for the Vikings that neither of them pick Brent.

"dyeah_gb" wrote:



Last time, I read one of these "indispensable" mean basically the MVP... but they were ruling out all QBs because lets face it the QB position would be picked WAY too much if they were allowed to be a choice.

Finley may have a huge year but the WRs and Lee could pick up most the slack if Finley went down.

If Woodson went down then the other team would just put the Packers in nickel with 3 or 4 WRs and they would be passing a lot and putting up a lot of points.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Here is an interesting article about the most indispensable player on each team. It is unclear what they mean by indispensable but think they mean the best #2 on the team. Given this assumption, I notice they pick Woodson as our #2 as well as scouts Inc. Here is the article

http://1057thefan.cbslocal.com/2010/08/27/most-indispensable-nfc-north/ 


In terms of last year I agree with this hands down. If I was going to forecast for this year, I am betting on Finley. It is funny for the Vikings that neither of them pick Brent.

"beast" wrote:



Last time, I read one of these "indispensable" mean basically the MVP... but they were ruling out all QBs because lets face it the QB position would be picked WAY too much if they were allowed to be a choice.

Finley may have a huge year but the WRs and Lee could pick up most the slack if Finley went down.

If Woodson went down then the other team would just put the Packers in nickel with 3 or 4 WRs and they would be passing a lot and putting up a lot of points.

"dyeah_gb" wrote:



Yep. If Woodson goes down, especially with Harris being out, we're pretty much screwed. Even without Harris going down, Woodson is the person you want on a nr. 1 receiver, I don't know if Harris is still that played that can contain a Calvin Johnson or Chad Ocho Cinco.

The Vikes where horribly mediocre in pass defense before Allen came there. There's some coattail riding being done on the other side of that D-line. If he goes down, their entire pass defense is in shambles.

I like the Tommie Harris pick more than Chris Williams and I can't think of anyone for the Lions who's a better player and can pull this team better than Calvin Johnson.
RaiderPride
14 years ago
This is an interesting article/thought/responses. Thanks for posting this Dyeah.

I agree with Beast. Rule out the QB's. It is too obvious.

When I look at something like this, I look at it as a looking glass into the depth chart. For the Packers last year one could obviously have been picked from the O Line. The first half of the season was a horror for Chico. Not this year.

Is this not really a choice of who is the worst number two on the depth chart? So. Take your pick. (according to CBS Sportsline depth chart.)

Offense:

TE Lee
LT Newhouse
LG Bulaga
C Spitz
RG Lang
RT Giacomini
WR Nelson
RB Jackson
FB Huhn

Defense

LDE Harrel
NT Toribo
RDE Neal
LOL Popinga
LIT Josheph
RIL Bishop
ROL Jones
LC Lee
FS Martin
SS Peprah
RC Underwood

Above is als a great look at what The Packers need to address from positional needs.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (8m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (54m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (54m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (54m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.