The best case scenario is to have a top defense... Of course the old addage, "If you don't get scored on, you can't lose..." applies here.
However, how many times have you heard "It's better to be lucky than good"... I noticed on the list, ALL of the superbowl winning teams seem to have a very good defense except for last couple of years, but several teams with not as good offenses have won the superbowl...
So I'd say defense first.
"obi1" wrote:
You misread the list then. The majority of the teams in Zombie's list had offenses and defenses in the top 10, and of those the majority had a higher offensive ranking than defensive. Great D, greater O.
"WhiskeySam" wrote:
NO, I didn't.
Look at the Ravens, Bucs and the Pats. Their offensive stats weren't too impressive yet they all won the superbowl. Their defenses were top notch.
Other than the last 2 years, Just about EVERY superbowl Champion had stellar defenses... Mind you, they all had great offenses as well, but, The 3 teams I mentioned above did win w/o a stellar offense.
However, There is not a case of the great offensive team who won the superbowl with a mediocre defense... Other than the Giants and the Colts... LAST 2 years.
We also can't really count the Giants because they got VERY hot at the end for the superbowl and rode the momentum throughout teh playoffs.
One more thing, of all the points that the team was credited for in this list, how many of the points scored came by the way of returns/defense?
"obi1" wrote: