Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Huh? Or was that getting back at my Dutch windmill crack? :)

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Pointing out that people should look beyond the usual suspects.

Soon you'll all bow before our mighty Dutch feet.

Or not, because you spoiled it for us.

"Wade" wrote:



You had your chance. And you let the Brits whoop you.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
My smartass comments to Rock aside, Americans would do well to look carefully at the later history of either Holland or England during the late life of their respective East India companies.

Either provides a great cautionary tale for anyone who wishes to see when economics and the pursuit of power get treated as one and the same.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I could not have said it better, Wade. Empires, particularly mercantilistic empires, always fall. Always.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

Either provides a great cautionary tale for anyone who wishes to see when economics and the pursuit of power get treated as one and the same.

"Wade" wrote:



I could not have said it better, Wade. Empires, particularly mercantilistic empires, always fall. Always.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:




+1 to you both.

Particularly interesting you mentioned Holland, seeing as I recently have had to work through and provide feedback for one of my Professor's works based on the economy of Indonesia, Java in particular. Quite a bit of background was included regarding Dutch colonies there, was some fascinating stuff.

And reading about the British Empire, especially during the later stages of Colonialism through to the stages of the two great World Wars, is a (secret-nerdy) passion of mine.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago
I generally try to stay away from giving my opinions on these things, but one post in particular I completely agree with:


In the next 25-50, there is going to be huge, positively huge demand for oil and natural gas. And there's this amazingly huge, largely untapped, supply of both sitting there beneath all the anarchy.

"Wade" wrote:



Oil, and more generally the quality of being able to produce energy at our convenience / time of choosing to meet demand - when the people as consumers demand it that is - will, I think, be a big, big factor in leading to the third great war, if there ever is one.

As a species, humans have been spoiled by having the ability to have energy (be is electricity, or gasoline, or what have you) on-demand. The sources to produce such energy are only so much. I personally do not see us as a species shifting from our desire to have energy when we so deem it necessary to use... meaning eventually when the sources to produce such energy become scarcer and scarcer, the need to have in your possession such sources will also rise higher and higher.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
A competing theory is that the proximate cause of the next major world conflict will be water -- or more specifically, the scarcity thereof. Perhaps it will be a combination of those causes, lack of both energy and water.

It's doubtful the world will ever see a world war on the scale of World War I or II ever again, though. There is a fundamental difference in the geopolitical situation of today as compared with that of the previous eras. In those days, there were formal international treaties that obligated countries to declare war in the event their allies declared war. In effect, those world wars were triggered automatically. No such analogous situation exists today.

If I had to speculate, however, I would say that any future world conflict will pit Europe and North (perhaps also South) America against Southeast Asia, probably in alliance with Russia. The Islamic world will be pitted somewhere in the middle, splintered in alliance with whichever faction countries find most strategically advantageous. I don't see the Islamic community functioning as a unified bloc in event of a global conflict. They don't have the strategic resources (other than oil) or the culture of innovation to survive on their own.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
it still amazes me that intelligent people think Iran or N. Korea are nothing to fear. Of course intelligent people thought Japan was nothing to fear too. Or because Germany was SO far away, they were nothing to fear either.

Putting weapons like they now have in the hands of nut cases IS something to fear. They might not be able to wipe out the entire U.S., but they could take out enough cities here to kill millions.
But if it's not MY city, why should i care, right?

SAME thing with "gun control" nuts. They want more strict gun control laws.....but they don't want to accept that the only people that will obey those laws are LAW ABIDING CITIZENS. It;s the NUT JOB that doesn't obey the laws that you have to worry about. Just like Korea and Iran.
Not keeping watch on people like that is a good way to get yourself killed.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

A competing theory is that the proximate cause of the next major world conflict will be water -- or more specifically, the scarcity thereof. Perhaps it will be a combination of those causes, lack of both energy and water.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



That is indeed an interesting theory, and one which worries me on the basis of global warming possibly factoring into the onset of more natural disasters, such as floods on the scale of those Pakistan is currently experiencing. Here, a clear lack of clean and drinkable water becomes a paramount issue.

Interestingly, having a mother with ties to India leaves me less concerned about water being the cause of the next great world war. I mean in villages and slums you get to see not only some of the most deplorable conditions humankind has to live in, but simultaneously some of the most remarkable human ingenuity in regards to dealing with lack of clean water. I mean the sources that some people find for clean water - aside from stealing from shop owners - are remarkable: using makeshift pumps to get water from the ground, finding water reservoirs natural to plants, etc.


Add that to the fact that - as sad as it is to say this - those who cannot obtain the cleanest of drinking water seem to build up some form of resistance to some of the germs and bacteria commonly found in water... and I am left a bit skeptical at the idea that a water shortage could spark the next great war.

Admittedly though, I have begun to rethink my position in light of research indicating that with the onset of global warming, more natural disasters will ensue. In addition, I will readily admit that I have given little time to perusing scholarly research on the shortage of clean and drinkable water. In fact, any time I have spent reading through such works has been in regards to drawing out material for my own research about the consequences of making water a human right. I'd welcome any articles you may be able to link to that further explore the scarcity of water.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago


It's doubtful the world will ever see a world war on the scale of World War I or II ever again, though. There is a fundamental difference in the geopolitical situation of today as compared with that of the previous eras. In those days, there were formal international treaties that obligated countries to declare war in the event their allies declared war. In effect, those world wars were triggered automatically. No such analogous situation exists today.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:




I totally echo your thoughts. I would also add that a concerted effort by nations to respect the UN Declaration of Human Rights, or at least the spirit of that Declaration, would also limit the possibility of having a great war on the scale of WWI and WWII; but this is a secondary aspect to the fact that the geopolitical landscape today does not parallel the one that existed during those World Wars.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Porforis
14 years ago

it still amazes me that intelligent people think Iran or N. Korea are nothing to fear. Of course intelligent people thought Japan was nothing to fear too. Or because Germany was SO far away, they were nothing to fear either.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I'm not saying that Iran and NK aren't a potential devastating threat, but to compare them to WWII Germany or Japan is a bit of a stretch. Neither country has even close to the sheer forces or ability to project itself internationally that Germany and Japan did. With these regimes, it's all about unconventional and nuclear mayhem, which can only do so much damage.

Putting weapons like they now have in the hands of nut cases IS something to fear. They might not be able to wipe out the entire U.S., but they could take out enough cities here to kill millions.
But if it's not MY city, why should i care, right?

"Cheesey" wrote:



Nobody's suggesting that we should give Kim Jong more nukes and some missiles to strap them to, or that a few million deaths are something to scoff at. However, please try to remember the death tolls in the first two world wars. A bit of a difference there, and could have been a whole lot worse.

SAME thing with "gun control" nuts. They want more strict gun control laws.....but they don't want to accept that the only people that will obey those laws are LAW ABIDING CITIZENS. It;s the NUT JOB that doesn't obey the laws that you have to worry about. Just like Korea and Iran.
Not keeping watch on people like that is a good way to get yourself killed

"Cheesey" wrote:



Not really going to comment on this as this has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.