Reading Tweets, reports, and blogs on Camp· Page 3

LambeauEast
Rookie

14 years ago

I agree with you. Bishop should NOT start over Hawk.

I still fail to understand WHY people do not like Hawk. He has been a good linebacker for us every since we drafted him. Sure, he hasn't been as good as expected (being drafted 5th overall), but he's been a very solid piece of this defense.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

I also agree. Top 5 draft pick worthy, no...but solid, minus a hiccup here and there, absolutely!

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#22

Fluid, Detlev. He looks fluid back there. Technically, "fluid" and "fluent" mean exactly the same thing ("flowing"), but in English, we only use "fluent" when it comes to describing language proficiency, not body mechanics.

Just a little subtlety your dictionary won't help you with. 🙂

VinceLambeauStarr
Member

14 years ago

#23

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

You are SUCH a fuckin' loser.

...

Can I be your groupie?

Zero2Cool is my captain.

PackerTraxx
Senior Member

14 years ago

#24

He's been better than Mandrich, Fullwood, or Reynolds and I predict will play longer than Sharpe(not Sharpe's fault). Just a thought.

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?

Rockmolder
Honored Member

14 years ago

#25

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Awww. I felt like I was getting on a roll, but I'm glad that you shot me down and took away all my momentum.

But, ty.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#26

I wouldn't correct you if I didn't think your grasp of English is nothing short of amazing. There are plenty of people out there I don't bother correcting.

PackerTraxx
Senior Member

14 years ago

#27

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Awww. I felt like I was getting on a roll, but I'm glad that you shot me down and took away all my momentum.

But, ty.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Rock, you are on a roll! !!!

Fluid and flowing I don't think of the same. When you say fluid I think of a DB, RB or WO. When you say flowing I think of a ballerina. :icon_smile: :cyclopsani: :icon_smile:

Just messin' around. :icon_smile:

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#28

PackerTraxx, true, but most of us never stop to think that things like air are actually fluids too. 😉

DakotaT
Select Member

14 years ago

#29

There are plenty of people out there I don't bother correcting.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

That's cause you know these old men still have a couple cans of whoop ass to pull out. It's either that or you feel sorrow for us. :icon_smile:

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#30

I would consider it an honor to have my ass kicked by you, good sir.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (24m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (24m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (24m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (32m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (32m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (53m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS