Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
Sounds like a second half package to me. Shut down the run and get them thinking pass, then shut down the pass.

The problem with using it on the Vikings is they catch pretty well out of the base with AP and Shank. I wouldn't want that package in when they are running out of their base. I think we are better off hitting them with a balanced D that can take care of controlling AP without sacrificing coverage. Let him get 100 yards but don't let him break one big. I think we can do that.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Sounds like a second half package to me. Shut down the run and get them thinking pass, then shut down the pass.

The problem with using it on the Vikings is they catch pretty well out of the base with AP and Shank. I wouldn't want that package in when they are running out of their base. I think we are better off hitting them with a balanced D that can take care of controlling AP without sacrificing coverage. Let him get 100 yards but don't let him break one big. I think we can do that.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Sacrificing coverage? That personel group is perfect to rotect against the pass.

Bishop's better than Hawk in coverage, although he's not a big guy who takes on blockers in the running game. Chillar is our best coverage LB. There's a reason why he plays safety in the "Big Okie" package and why he's nearly the only LB who we want one on one against TEs.

AP showed some decent hands last year, but he's no Brian Westbrook. Or even a Chester Taylor.

I have a lot of respect for the Vikes roster and I actually think it's better than ours if Favre gets back, but Shiancoe is one of the most overrated guys I know.

He was 16th in yards, 11th in catches and 20th in yards per game. The only thing he really had going for him was his great amount of TD catches, which ranked 2nd.

But Havner ranked 17th and I don't want to call him the 17th best at his position.

I still see a lot of Donald Lee in Visante Shiancoe.

You can make a lot of TEs look really good when you have a veteran QB who likes to throw it to his TE.

Lee's 2007 numbers are nearly the same as Visante's, except for the amount of TD catches.

Now I'm not saying that Shiancoe isn't a good TE. A lot of teams would love to have him as their starter, but I can come up with 10-15 who are better.

I think his production will take a sharp decline as soon as Favre walks away.
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
I was not saying that package sacrifices in coverage. I was saying it sacrifices against the run. That is why I wouldn't put it up against their base. I wouldn't want to have AP running against them. I went on to add that a balanced D would be the best way to defeat the Vikings.

I also said that I think we can do it. If we had a healthy O-line and healthy safeties, we would have beaten them last year. Because I think we are better than they are. I thought we were last year but we had too many injuries while they didn't and we were new in the 3-4.

I was trying to point out that the Vikings would probably keep the same personnel in and throw out of the base. AP got a lot of catches last year and Shank is fairly competent. With BFer throwing and their top two receivers, they are pretty good throwing out of their base.

I probably could have broken that up a little more clearly last time.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Rockmolder
14 years ago

I was not saying that package sacrifices in coverage. I was saying it sacrifices against the run. That is why I wouldn't put it up against their base. I wouldn't want to have AP running against them. I went on to add that a balanced D would be the best way to defeat the Vikings.

I also said that I think we can do it. If we had a healthy O-line and healthy safeties, we would have beaten them last year. Because I think we are better than they are. I thought we were last year but we had too many injuries while they didn't and we were new in the 3-4.

I was trying to point out that the Vikings would probably keep the same personnel in and throw out of the base. AP got a lot of catches last year and Shank is fairly competent. With BFer throwing and their top two receivers, they are pretty good throwing out of their base.

I probably could have broken that up a little more clearly last time.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Whoops, sorry.

I'm not that scared of teams that can run the ball. You want to stop the pass first and the run second. I know, play-action and all, and you don't want to have teams run rampid on your defense, but I'd rather have the nr. 1 pass defense and nr. 10 rush defense than the other way around. Being very good against the run didn't do us that much good last year.

Or the Vikings the 2 or 3 years before.

That said, how much do you really lose against the run with that package? Jones is someone who's overpowered pretty easily, at least last year. Hawk is someone who can take on some blockers, so he will be missed, but Bishop's energy, agility and movability should help against the run, as well.

One of the bigger drop-offs in run support might be at the safety spot. Burnett's big thing out of college was that he couldn't tackle. He's been amazing in camp so far, getting a lot of pass breakups and (potential) picks, but little has been said about run support so far.

And sorry for the whole Shianc rant. Lol.
bozz_2006
14 years ago
I feel like I'm the only one here who doesn't think Bishop should be starting over Hawk.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
The knock I have on Bishop is, he is the same size and close to the same speed as Barnette. He is not as polished, technique wise. He can take on the run game aggressively, but he can make mistakes on assignments and technique. I would much rather have a Hawk than a second Barnette against a run. Your right about Jones, but he is a little bigger this year and having Pickett next to him may help anchor that end. That may have been part of the point of swapping him out there. To give Jones a big savvy vet next to him to help stuff the run and suck up double teams.

Rockmolder: Thanks for the apology, I wasn't offended. I just thought I wasn't clear enough.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Stevetarded
14 years ago

Eh, I think you have to temper that with the fact that this is day 2 of practice. Defense always coalesces way ahead of the offense.

"Wade" wrote:



Yet every year there's the "eeek, offense didn't dominate" thing. lol. I've learned to just laugh at it and roll with the goofyness.

I've been saving up money to buy a football season's worth of alcohol.

"tromadz" wrote:



Yes, but every year the "offense didn't dominate" refrain in training camp was followed by "OL wasn't dominant" in the regular season.

I'm not going to judge the year's possibilities by a week or two of training camp, either, but I *am* skeptical enough of the OL that I will find it easier to worry earlier than most. Because I've also heard the "it's early and the defense always works better earlier" refrain before...only to be followed by more than enough lingering and continuing questions on the OL.

But still, I'm goofy by nature. :)

"bozz_2006" wrote:



I don't think the offense dominating in training camp has anything really to do with how the offensive line is performing when they aren't even allowed to touch the QB. Even if they came out ripping the defense to shreds it would say absolutely 0 about how the O-Line is going to look. It seems like it's pretty much impossible to tell how it will work until they get in a live game week 1 otherwise they just don't get tested.
blank
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

I feel like I'm the only one here who doesn't think Bishop should be starting over Hawk.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



I agree with you. Bishop should NOT start over Hawk.

I still fail to understand WHY people do not like Hawk. He has been a good linebacker for us every since we drafted him. Sure, he hasn't been as good as expected (being drafted 5th overall), but he's been a very solid piece of this defense.
UserPostedImage
PackerTraxx
14 years ago
The defense just about always looks good first. I would be more worried if the offense was tearing up the defensse.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Rockmolder
14 years ago

I feel like I'm the only one here who doesn't think Bishop should be starting over Hawk.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



I agree with you. Bishop should NOT start over Hawk.

I still fail to understand WHY people do not like Hawk. He has been a good linebacker for us every since we drafted him. Sure, he hasn't been as good as expected (being drafted 5th overall), but he's been a very solid piece of this defense.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Let me make my point clear.

I'm not yelling for Bishop to start to start because he's the better all-around player. Hawk is a much thicker-body guy. Someone who can take on some blockers. He also has a nose for the ball.

Whenever he gets into coverage, though, it just looks wrong. Not horrible, like Kampman, but he just doesn't seem to belong anywhere deeper than 5 yards or in man on anyone but the FB.

He proved as much in practice against yesterday by getting consistently in zone coverages.

Bishop looks a lot more fluent back there. Maybe we'll lose a bit in in run support, but gain a bit in pas coverage.

And that's a trade-off that this defense can make. It's whether you want to have your best players on the field or your best team.

Next to that, I think Hawk is set to make $10 million next year.

He's not going to get that.

We might just as well see what we have in Bishop if he starts a full season. That way, we can see how big of a priority ILB will be next year in the draft.
Fan Shout
beast (13h) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
beast (13h) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
Mucky Tundra (14h) : that contained all prospects info and contact
Mucky Tundra (14h) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
Zero2Cool (14h) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
beast (14h) : Not sure anyone is interested in Isaiah Simmons... Collin Oliver might of taken his potential slot
beast (15h) : I'm going with Jax Ulbrich is not telling the whole truth... he accidentally came across it? Why would a defensive coordinator have a QB #?
Zero2Cool (15h) : He's not that great, but final piece of the script.\
Zero2Cool (15h) : If we add Isaiah Simmons, book your Super Bowl tickets
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Colts 1st round TE Tyler Warren also got prank called, was that Jax Ulbrich as well?
Zero2Cool (16h) : Jax Ulbrich, Jeff Ulbrich’s son, released an apology for his role in the Shedeur Sanders prank call.
Martha Careful (16h) : apparently he did not participate in practice or play on the east west shrine game nor the NFL combine. The kid was a mediocre spoiled brat
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Yeah that one that was a super wounded duck that Sanders supporters are highlighting to prove a point
Zero2Cool (16h) : Shough is the guy who missed guys at combine isn't he?
beast (17h) : It's not official until I'm dead! I have a chance still! (Not really)
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : I could feel my body decomposing in real time when I read that
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : @MIKEYSAINRISTIL Tyler Shough will officially be the last person drafted to the NFL born in the 1900’s
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : saw the tweet, he meant the city
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : Was that for the team or the city?
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 3m Draft grade is in: Green Bay gets an A. The people, the city, the venue were all superb. NFL Draft’s next
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Matt LaFleur says Jaire Alexander is participating in #Packers offseason program, which has been conducted virtually during this first week
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : ✅ ...
buckeyepackfan (26-Apr) : Check
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Matthew Golden cahanged 81 to 22??
TheKanataThrilla (26-Apr) : Sam Howell to Vikings...guess no Aaron
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Agree
dfosterf (26-Apr) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (26-Apr) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (26-Apr) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (26-Apr) : Great point Martha
beast (26-Apr) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (26-Apr) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (26-Apr) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 4rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (25-Apr) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
12h / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / Around The NFL / bboystyle

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16h / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

27-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.