Underwood was out for 1 game, the 15th week I believe, when we lost to Pitt. He was on the injury report for 3 weeks with a hip injury.
Losing Harris, Blackmon, Lee and Underwood made it so Bush and Bell were in as the Nickle and Dime or for most of the game. That may be why Rothlesberger had 500 yards.
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
Okay, I've had it with this excuse.
Brandon Underwood missed several games WHILE Harris was still on the field. Underwood missed one game since the week five bye, the Steeler game. Hardly the reason we lost.
The comment of four of six CB's were out is a bunch of bull.
The
only injury to our secondary that really
hurt was losing Al Harris.
Blackmon's impact is as a returner.
Lee has had little to no impact.
If you look it up, many teams lost a few CB's for several games during the season.
Having our 4th and 5th CB's out is hardly an excuse or reason our passing defense was scorched by teams such as Vikings, Cardinals, and Steelers.
They took advantage of a hole in the passing defense, the middle of the field, short quick passes. We weren't applying enough pressure on the QB. That is why we got torched.
Would Harris' presence made much of a difference? I doubt it and I think Harris is a good 3 corner.
I sure as hell hope the Packers aren't banking on Lee and Blackmon to fix the passing defense. It's the scheme coupled with little to no consistent pass rush.
The 3 - 4 NEEDS a pass rush to be effective.
"Dexter_Sinister" wrote: