Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Web Page Name 

Ted Thompson has placed a big bet on second-year linebacker Brad Jones.

If an inadequate pass rush prevents the Green Bay Packers from advancing deep into the playoffs, then the general manager will shoulder most of the responsibility because he didnt spend a high draft pick or free-agent money on an outside linebacker.

But if Jones builds on his competent half-season last year as a rookie starter and adds something to the pass rush in 2010, then Thompson will have judged well the talent on his roster.

While theres a decent chance Thompson will add another outside linebacker before the season starts, either via a trade or waiver pickup during training camp, thats still only a possibility. Thompson has so far stood pat with Jones at one of the key playmaking positions in defensive coordinator Dom Capers 3-4 scheme.

If Thompson had felt desperate, he would have done something, anything, to add an outside linebacker at least as a fallback much like he did last season when he traded up to select Clay Matthews late in the first round to start at right outside linebacker. But he didnt.

If youd have told me at this time last year that Brad Jones will have started seven games for us down the stretch (in 2009), I dont know if Id have felt real comfortable at that point, Capers said. I feel better about it now.

Though the Packers arent going out of their way to talk up Jones this offseason, their actions say theyre prepared to go with him as their starter in a season in which they could be a legitimate championship contender.

Brady Poppinga lined up at left outside linebacker with the No. 1 defense in the organized team activities practice that was open to reporters on Wednesday, but Capers said after practice that Jones is his starter opposite Matthews.

They dont need anybody else, Poppinga said of he and Jones manning the position this season.

Jones was an unexpectedly big contributor as a rookie even though he was a seventh-round pick and sat out the first three weeks of his rookie training camp because of a back injury. Missing the critical first three weeks of camp can cost a low draft pick a roster spot, but Jones showed enough as a pass rusher and special-teams player in his limited time to make the final 53-man roster.

By midseason, hed surpassed Poppinga as Aaron Kampmans backup, and in eight games as a starter, playoffs included, Jones had four sacks and 11 quarterback hits.

Jones played last season at about 239 pounds, which is light for the position, though Capers said Jones might be physically mature enough to hold the 10 pounds hes added in the offseason workout program.

Hes a pretty good leverage player, Capers said. Hes probably stronger than his size would indicate because he understands playing with leverage. And hes got a little pass-rush instincts. Hes slippery in terms of not giving people a large blocking surface, he can get on the edge and slip by and use his hands, that type of thing. To me thats one of the qualities good pass rushers have.

Along with Jones, the Packers also are placing a big bet that their pass rush will get better simply because theyve had a full season in Capers 3-4 scheme.

They made a significant improvement in that area in Capers first season, when they jumped from No. 25 in sacks percentage in 2008 to No. 12 last year in their switch to the 3-4.

But a shortcoming against top competition was their pass rush. They failed to sack Brett Favre in two losses to the Minnesota Vikings, and in their playoff loss to Arizona, when Capers decided to play more coverage than blitz against quick-triggered Kurt Warner, they also had no sacks.

Capers said the defense discovered its identity about halfway through last year, and he has a good feel for his personnel and what blitzes work best.

With this scheme, weve always been a top-sack team, Capers said. At four different places weve been either first or second in sacks (in the league at least one season). I just feel like theres a natural progression of them understanding the scheme, and it has to come down to what you see on the field and gain confidence in terms of calling. The more confident you are, the more pressures youre going to call. We did that as we progressed.

The Packers also have talked this offseason about using alternative outside rushers on passing downs.

On draft weekend, coach Mike McCarthy talked of possibly rushing inside linebacker Brandon Chillar from the outside on occasion, though Chillar has minimal experience as a pure outside rusher. Last year, he shot gaps as a zone-rush blitzer and never lined up against tackles and tried to beat them with defensive-end rush techniques such as dipping his shoulder and turning the corner.

More likely, if the Packers arent getting enough pressure from their outside rushers as the season goes on, Capers on occasion might line up defensive lineman Cullen Jenkins at end on obvious passing downs and let him rush with his hand on the ground.

But Capers mostly will look to his scheme to generate rush. He suggested Chillar and Nick Barnett will blitz more this season Chillar had two sacks and two quarterback hits last season, Barnett four sacks and nine hits and named cornerback Charles Woodson (two sacks and three hits) as one of the teams best rushers.

Nick can rush from either inside or outside, Capers said. Weve got some different combinations, it might not be a 3-4 outside linebacker type or defensive end type, so we might have to seek it by different means.


UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
14 years ago
He's slippery. lol. I like that. In a season where teams learned to pick on Kampman, they weren't able to do that once Jones came in. He wasn't outstanding, but he was serviceable. If he can put on a few pounds to toughen up against the run and chip blockers, and bring a little more in his pass rush I think he will be fine. Would I love to have a top-tier player at this position? Sure. Do I feel better about the ROLB coming into this season than I did last season? Oh yes!
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Brad Jones was a pleasant surprise. I didn't really expect much from him as he was a 7th round pick, and now he's a starter, and a solid one at that. Would like to see more of what he can do in pass rushing situations.

I'd actually put Jones above "serviceable" and put more of a "solid" tag on him. In only 7 games started, he registered 4 sacks and if I remember correctly, he was used more in coverage than rushing.

He played a lot smarter than a rookie too.

More likely, if the Packers arent getting enough pressure from their outside rushers as the season goes on, Capers on occasion might line up defensive lineman Cullen Jenkins at end on obvious passing downs and let him rush with his hand on the ground.

But Capers mostly will look to his scheme to generate rush. He suggested Chillar and Nick Barnett will blitz more this season Chillar had two sacks and two quarterback hits last season, Barnett four sacks and nine hits and named cornerback Charles Woodson (two sacks and three hits) as one of the teams best rushers.

Nick can rush from either inside or outside, Capers said. Weve got some different combinations, it might not be a 3-4 outside linebacker type or defensive end type, so we might have to seek it by different means.



I really liked this part of the article. Dom's obviously aware that one of our biggest problems last year was the lack of pass rush. If we have to blitz more, then blitz more. I'd rather see us die fighting than die rushing 3 people and at the very least, I want to see the opposing QB sore.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rockmolder
14 years ago
I'd put him down as servicable.

The big problem is this. When some teams actually put a RT on him, he was lost. Best example is our second game against Chicago. And he didn't look that impressive against TEs or RBs, either.

I'm hoping that he really has become much stronger and has worked on his leverage technique etc. like Dom said. It'd be great to have two guys who can get to the QB.

I'm just not sold on this group yet, though.
14 years ago
I'm expecting a big leap in Jones' second year. There is no reason to think otherwise. That he was even able to hold his own as an undersized rookie speaks volumes of his potential.

The statement early on in the article about "spending a high draft pick" is just shoddy journalism. Unless he means we should have taken an OLB in place of Bulaga, he has absolutely no case. There were NO high round OLBs left by the time our 2nd round pick came up.

I can't stand it when they try to make the same played out point without even looking at the facts. That's lazy writing.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I'm not expecting anything big from Brad Jones. I think fans are over rating him.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

If an inadequate pass rush prevents the Green Bay Packers from advancing deep into the playoffs, then the general manager will shoulder most of the responsibility because he didnt spend a high draft pick or free-agent money on an outside linebacker.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Ugh. I didn't get much farther than this statement. Can we get ONE fucking article free of spin from these snide Gazette reporters? Leave the agenda to O'Reilly and just give me the fucking facts -- you know, like a reporter is supposed to do. I'm a reasonably well-educated adult; I can think for myself and come to my own conclusions.

I fear the age of journalism is gone forever. All we have nowadays are professional essayists.

And yes, I know I bitch about this too much.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

I'd put him down as servicable.

The big problem is this. When some teams actually put a RT on him, he was lost. Best example is our second game against Chicago. And he didn't look that impressive against TEs or RBs, either.

I'm hoping that he really has become much stronger and has worked on his leverage technique etc. like Dom said. It'd be great to have two guys who can get to the QB.

I'm just not sold on this group yet, though.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Well, maybe it's because I compare him to Kampy, who was just plain bad in that role and compared to Kampy, he looked solid.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
tromadz
14 years ago
Brad Jones was a good OLB.

What else could you want? A great OLB? That's a fair point, sure. Considering Brad Jones was a rookie nobody expected anything out of and was a GOOD olb...jesus, not every LB is gonna be CM3.

He was GOOD.

AND HE SHOULD ONLY GET BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HE WAS A ROOKIE!!!!!!!!

MY CAPS LOCK IS STUCK!!!!!!!!!

He was a rookie who stepped in and played some good OLB. It's his job to lose and I would be SHOCKED if he didn't improve and even if he doesn't, then we're "stuck" with a GOOD OLB opposite CM3.

I think I could live with that.

With that said, if someone outplayed him, I'm all for it. I'm all for someone outplaying someone else and improving any position. Jones isn't a flashy player but he gets the job done. He wasn't perfect. He wasn't CM3, but expecting that from a late round rookie is silly.

Anyway...you get my point. The kid is good, should get better. We're more than fine at OLB.
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago
Interesting to look at the stats of Jones... In 8 starts last year (all after Kampy went down) he had 4 sacks, 5 QB hits, and 10 QB pressures.

Compare that with Kampy: in 9 games as a starter, he has 4 sacks, 12 QB hits, and 11 QB Pressures.

Those stats are similar, which is important when you consider that both Jones and Kampman had almost identical pass-rushing snaps (201 for Jones vs 208 for Kampman).

You'd like to see the hits go up for Jones, but other than that over a course of 16 games as a rookie he projected to tally 8 sacks. That's not bad at all. With a year of getting stronger and more tutelage from Kevin Green (if I'm not mistaken, Jones missed part of Training Camp last year) you expect him to improve.

I'll echo Trom's sentiments: we're fine at OLB. If Jones produces at exactly the same level he did last year, we'll have okay production. But you expect him to improve, and thereby also improve his production too.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (9h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (22h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.