Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Source Link 

Are the Green Bay Packers better off now than five years ago when Ted Thompson was hired as general manager?

The record says yes. Thompson inherited a 10-6 team coming off a first-round playoff loss when he replaced Mike Sherman as GM in January 2005. Five years later, Thompson has an 11-5 team also coming off a first-round playoff defeat.

A one-game improvement in the standings doesnt seem like much, but a comparison of the Packers roster in 2005 and today indicates, on paper at least, an improved team with greater potential.

In a subjective assessment, the Packers have improved at 11 of the 22 starting positions, gotten worse at seven spots and stayed the same at four others. At three positions tight end, nose tackle and one cornerback spot the Packers are significantly better. They also have upgraded their depth.

Here is an analysis of how the Packers compare (better, worse, same) to five years ago. Players during the 2004 season Shermans last as GM were matched up against the current roster.

Starting offense
Quarterback: Brett Favre lovers will squawk, but the numbers suggest Aaron Rodgers (30 touchdowns, 7 interceptions, 103.2 rating, 4,434 yards) is an upgrade over a 35-year-old Favre during the 2004 season (30 TDs, 17 INTs, 92.4 rating, 4,088 yards). BETTER

Running back: Ahman Green was in his prime and coming off a fifth consecutive 1,000-yard season (1,163 yards, 4.5 average). Ryan Grants rushing numbers are similar (1,253, 4.4), but Green was a bigger pass-catching threat (40 receptions compared to Grants 25). WORSE

Fullback: Theres not much difference between an aging William Henderson and the John Kuhn-Korey Hall combo at the least consequential starting position. SAME

No. 1 receiver: Javon Walker had one breakout season but flamed out quickly. Consistency gives Greg Jennings the edge. BETTER

No. 2 receiver: Its only natural that a 29-year-old Donald Driver (84 catches, 1,208 yards) had a little more spring in his step than he does now (70, 1,061), but there isnt a huge gap. WORSE

Tight end: The difference between Jermichael Finley (55 catches, 676 yards) and Bubba Franks (34, 361) is like night and day. MUCH BETTER

Left tackle: Until rookie first-round draft pick Bryan Bulaga proves otherwise, Chad Clifton remains the starter. But he is older, slower and more injury prone. WORSE

Left guard: Daryn Colledge hasnt come close to filling Mike Wahles shoes. If Wahle was a size 12, Colledge wears a size 9. WORSE

Center: Ill take my chances with Scott Wells over Grey Ruegamer. BETTER

Right guard: Thompson has been chastised for letting Marco Rivera go in 2005, but it was the right move. I favor a youthful Josh Sitton over a long-in-the-tooth Rivera. BETTER

Right tackle: As with Clifton, its admirable that Mark Tauscher is still around, but hes no longer in his prime. WORSE

Starting defense
Primary pass rusher: This designation will help in comparing the current 3-4 defense to the Packers former 4-3 scheme. Right defensive end Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila was a sack machine in his prime but one-dimensional, and thus right outside linebacker Clay Matthews receives the nod. BETTER

Defensive end: Johnny Jolly is versatile and can be a force but has stiff competition against Aaron Kampman entering his best years. WORSE

Nose tackle: Grady Jackson doesnt reside in the same ZIP code as Ryan Pickett and B.J. Raji. MUCH BETTER

Defensive line: I will take Cullen Jenkins over Cletidus Hunt any day of the week and twice on Sundays. But then, I would take just about anyone over the underachieving Hunt. BETTER

Middle linebacker: Nick Barnett still is the starter after all these years, and despite a potentially devastating knee injury in 2008, can still bring it. SAME

Linebacker: Brad Jones has only half a season of starting experience under his belt, but he looks good compared to Hannibal Navies. BETTER

Linebacker: A.J. Hawk gets criticized for not making enough plays, but his stock soars when matched up against Nail Diggs. BETTER

Cornerback: Five years and one serious knee injury have taken their toll on Al Harris. He cant possibly be as good, can he? WORSE

Cornerback: Ahmad Carroll vs. Charles Woodson? Thats like comparing my dandelion-infested back yard to Lambeau Field. MUCH BETTER

Free safety: Take your pick between two Pro Bowl-caliber players in Darren Sharper and Nick Collins. SAME

Strong safety: Atari Bigby has struggled the past two seasons, but hes a cut above Mark Roman. BETTER
Backup depth

Defense: Five years ago, bench players included R-Kal Truluck on the line, Paris Lenon and Steve Josue at linebacker, and Michael Hawthorne, Joey Thomas, Jason Horton, Chris Johnson and Bhawoh Jue in the secondary. Today, Tramon Williams is vastly better than Hawthorne as the No. 3 cornerback, and quality players like Raji and linebackers Brandon Chillar and Desmond Bishop cant even crack the starting lineup. BETTER

Offense: The 53-man playoff roster in January 2005 included Sean McHugh and Ben Steele at tight end, Robert Ferguson, Antonio Chatman and Andrae Thurman at receiver, and Steve Morley and Brad Bedell on the line. No wonder the Packers went out with barely a whimper in a first-round postseason loss to the Minnesota Vikings at Lambeau. BETTER
Other areas

Special teams: Other than kicker Ryan Longwell, the Packers special teams were mediocre five years ago, yet Thompson has failed to upgrade those units. SAME

Coaching: Mike McCarthy in four seasons has the same winning percentage (38-26, .594) as Mike Sherman in six seasons (57-39, .594). McCarthy gets the edge because he advanced to the NFC title game, while Sherman never got past the divisional round of the playoffs. BETTER


UserPostedImage
IronMan
14 years ago
Hmmm, I thought Vandermause hated TT? :shrug: (that sarcasm was directed at Nonstopdrivel and get_louder_at_lambeau.)
Greg C.
14 years ago
A pretty good meat-and-potatoes sort of article by Vandermause. I agree with his assessment. The improvement is especially noticeable when you look at the depth on the roster.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
IronMan, I have actually defended Vandermause in the past. My problem with him is that he's overly reactionary. His opinions seem to swing wildly from one week or month to the next. Right now he's up on Ted Thompson, but if the team starts out the season with a string of two or three defeats, he'll be the first to spear Thompson on a spit and roast him over an open fire. And then if they win the next six in a row, he'll be nominating Thompson for Executive of the Year. He rarely seems to have a long-term focus.

But yes, more often than not, he's laudatory of Thompson.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
14 years ago
I like comparison stuff like this. It makes you truly appreciate how good our 96 season was and how hard it is to put together a team like that.

I would say we are better than 5 years ago because of one thing: we can now hang with any team in the league, and I'm sorry but Sherman's teams in my opinion were always soft. Offensively we are similar, except Sherman always made sure the quarterback was vertical and we could run the ball. Defensively is where we differ. Today we have legitimate starters in every position except one of the safeties. Sherman's team had a weak defense.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

I like comparison stuff like this. It makes you truly appreciate how good our 96 season was and how hard it is to put together a team like that.

I would say we are better than 5 years ago because of one thing: we can now hang with any team in the league, and I'm sorry but Sherman's teams in my opinion were always soft. Offensively we are similar, except Sherman always made sure the quarterback was vertical and we could run the ball. Defensively is where we differ. Today we have legitimate starters in every position except one of the safeties. Sherman's team had a weak defense.

"DakotaT" wrote:



And that was one of the reasons that I was surprised that we went with another offensive coach in McCarthy.

If I'd have a strong offense in place, I'd want to go with a defensive coach who can turn that defense around.

Pretty much like the defesively strong Buccaneers trading for Gruden or the defensive powerhouse Ravens hiring Billick.

Not that I'm unhappy with McCarthy. I like what he's been doing. He's a good coach on offense and made some nice hires for the defensive side. It's just not a hire that I would've made.
Greg C.
14 years ago

IronMan, I have actually defended Vandermause in the past. My problem with him is that he's overly reactionary. His opinions seem to swing wildly from one week or month to the next. Right now he's up on Ted Thompson, but if the team starts out the season with a string of two or three defeats, he'll be the first to spear Thompson on a spit and roast him over an open fire. And then if they win the next six in a row, he'll be nominating Thompson for Executive of the Year. He rarely seems to have a long-term focus.

But yes, more often than not, he's laudatory of Thompson.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I think Vandermause just calls it as he sees it. His opinion vacillates depending on the team's performance, but he doesn't seem to ever get too extreme one way or another. So I'm fine with it. He does have a distinct preference for building through the draft, which is why he tends to be positive about Ted Thompson and critical of Vikings' management.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago

I like comparison stuff like this. It makes you truly appreciate how good our 96 season was and how hard it is to put together a team like that.

I would say we are better than 5 years ago because of one thing: we can now hang with any team in the league, and I'm sorry but Sherman's teams in my opinion were always soft. Offensively we are similar, except Sherman always made sure the quarterback was vertical and we could run the ball. Defensively is where we differ. Today we have legitimate starters in every position except one of the safeties. Sherman's team had a weak defense.

"DakotaT" wrote:



I like this stuff too.

The other problem with Sherman teams is we were always one injury away from complete disaster.

The biggest difference in that list is Woody vs A**** C******. Although Sherman's teams had Pro Bowlers, we also had people who were Arena League level.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
14 years ago

Hmmm, I thought Vandermause hated Ted Thompson? :shrug: (that sarcasm was directed at Nonstopdrivel and get_louder_at_lambeau.)

"IronMan" wrote:



That's Greg Bedard. Vandermause is just not a very good sportswriter in my opinion. I just don't think he's very bright.
warhawk
14 years ago
The thing about writers that drives me nuts is they just don't get it how important depth is. Every year they want to look at the starting 22 and then determine how they will fair.

The problem with that is the starting 22 is NEVER the ending 22. Near the end of the season when ALL teams have had to replace a significant number of players due to injury that starting group doesn't look close to the same most often.

This guy talks about the starting lineups and how 15 positions are better or the same. How about the next 22? I can tell you without hesitation that if you put the guys we have now up against who was there in '05 the current backups would beat the dog crap out of those guys.

Many of these guys are in rotations and have a huge impact on overall play. You have nickle and dime packages, DL rotations, and different WR sets. When you start getting into that there is just no comparison.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (3h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (3h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (11h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (12h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (13h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (13h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (13h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (15h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.