warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
If you feel you have a draft day trade in any round by the Packers post it here.

I am going to say if D. Thomas falls to us we will make a trade with Tampa Bay for their 2nd and 3rd round picks to include the first of their two 2nd round picks.

Some mocks have the Bucs taking Golden Tate with their first 2nd round pick and I figure they would jump on Thomas if they could get him instead.

It's a gamble that Thomas will still be there but he's off a lot of teams boards but Tampa is a team I think would look past the reasons others won't pull the trigger on him.

This would give the Pack early and late 2nd and 3rd round picks and my guess is Ted Thompson would have a field day with that.

Like four eventual starters maybe.
"The train is leaving the station."
Rockmolder
14 years ago
I thought that the scenario I showed in my Packers mock draft was pretty realistic. The rumors going around that the Jets will part ways with Shaun Ellis only adds to the realism.

I had the Jets trading their 1st (29th) and 2nd (61st) for the Packers' 1st (23rd) and 3rd (86th) round picks so the Jets can select DE/DT Jared Odrick before the Ravens can at 25.

It makes perfect sense with the value chart, as well (for what that's worth).
warhawk
  • warhawk
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

I thought that the scenario I showed in my Packers mock draft was pretty realistic. The rumors going around that the Jets will part ways with Shaun Ellis only adds to the realism.

I had the Jets trading their 1st (29th) and 2nd (61st) for the Packers' 1st (23rd) and 3rd (86th) round picks so the Jets can select DE/DT Jared Odrick before the Ravens can at 25.

It makes perfect sense with the value chart, as well (for what that's worth).

"Rockmolder" wrote:



I'm not sure how my scenario stacks up on the value chart but guessed it probably was something in line.

I could see some action out of the last eight teams like you suggest here since they were more restricted on making moves in the offseason. These are the better teams that might move up if they feel one or two guys can carry them over the top.
"The train is leaving the station."
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

I thought that the scenario I showed in my Packers mock draft was pretty realistic. The rumors going around that the Jets will part ways with Shaun Ellis only adds to the realism.

I had the Jets trading their 1st (29th) and 2nd (61st) for the Packers' 1st (23rd) and 3rd (86th) round picks so the Jets can select DE/DT Jared Odrick before the Ravens can at 25.

It makes perfect sense with the value chart, as well (for what that's worth).

"warhawk" wrote:



I'm not sure how my scenario stacks up on the value chart but guessed it probably was something in line.

I could see some action out of the last eight teams like you suggest here since they were more restricted on making moves in the offseason. These are the better teams that might move up if they feel one or two guys can carry them over the top.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Don't look at the value chart. It's one of the biggest pieces of bullshit around the web. Especially the high picks are massively over-priced according to the chart.
This is a placeholder
porky88
14 years ago
I think GB moves up to Miami's slot and selects C.J. Spiller.
Dulak
14 years ago

I think GB moves up to Miami's slot and selects C.J. Spiller.

"porky88" wrote:



I can only wish - this guy looks awesome; thats if hes there at the miami pick
Pack93z
14 years ago

I think GB moves up to Miami's slot and selects C.J. Spiller.

"porky88" wrote:



I don't think that GB is willing to sell out this draft to do so... it basically would be giving up their 2nd and probably 3rd to do so.. that is insane.

We can use this offensive line and defensive deep draft to improve upon the depth of this club.. this draft is almost tailor made for us this year.. more picks IMO would be the case.. and push some of the weaker depth off the club.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
doddpower
14 years ago

I think GB moves up to Miami's slot and selects C.J. Spiller.

"pack93z" wrote:



I don't think that GB is willing to sell out this draft to do so... it basically would be giving up their 2nd and probably 3rd to do so.. that is insane.

We can use this offensive line and defensive deep draft to improve upon the depth of this club.. this draft is almost tailor made for us this year.. more picks IMO would be the case.. and push some of the weaker depth off the club.

"porky88" wrote:



I agree. At some point there is not going to be enough snaps to go around to all of our offensive play makers. If he falls to 23 that's fine, but I'd rather keep our 2nd and 3rd round picks in this draft. We can win with our offense, but we need better O-line depth and a better pass rush to go further in the playoffs.
dhazer
14 years ago
Im on board with Porky on this, I think we trade up and take Spiller but I think it will be with Jacksonville. It won't cost us as much as you think. The Jags want to draft Tebow but don't want to take him that high so they will look to trade back and the Packers would be perfect.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be šŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I don't understand why we'd draft Spiller, though. Our running back notched 1250 yards and 11 touchdowns last season. This is on top of our 4000+ yard passing season. Why do we need another starting back? I guess you could make the same argument for not drafting OL in the first round, though: the offense racked up all those stats despite the deplorable state of the OL. Maybe the Packers front office is hoping to compensate for poor line play by sheer brute scoring. It would be fun to watch.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (52m) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (58m) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (2h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (8h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas šŸŽ„šŸŽ
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.