Who are they after · PACKERSHOME

dhazer
Veteran Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

If this happens who do you think they are after?

Packers | Interested in trading up in first round
Comment (0) Tweet! Share on Facebook
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:05:29 -0400

Adam Schefter, of ESPN, reports the Green Bay Packers have expressed interest in trading up to within the top 12 spots in the 2010 NFL Draft.

http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl#ixzz0laHa2Dta

Could they be going for an OT or trying to sneak up for heaven forbid for Dfosters health Dez Bryant lol.

Any ideas who they could be targeting?

possible trade partner?

Redskins | Allen says team willing to trade first pick
Comment (0) Tweet! Share on Facebook
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:21:17 -0400

Gary Fitzgerald, of Redskins.com, reports Washington Redskins general manager Bruce Allen said the team is open to trading their first-round draft choice but said he can't project what will happen. He said the team would be willing to accept draft picks for next year's draft in a potential trade.

http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl#ixzz0laI75bfa

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

15 years ago

I'd say it's an OT - I'd say it was Berry, but I don't think they'd get up high enough to grab him unless they're talking really early on in the first 12 spots. Given the team needs and the players available, S or OT would be the positions to move up for.

blank

dhazer
Veteran Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

I was just looking at Waleters Mock draft to see who they have projected in the top 12 and I would like the trade with the Redskins to get Berry and I think thats who Ted Thompson might be targeting. He has stated before he is happy with the O-line.

But I would love it more if he did the trade to get Dez just to watch Dave go nuts, it would be a little sweet revenge after Ted Thompson passed on Crabtree last year :P

also the Redskins have #4 overall so that would leave you pretty much your choice of players.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

This was posted in a rumor thread, as well, but it's a pretty big rumor. It warrants its own thread, I reckon.

One wild card they might be looking at at 12 is C.J. Spiller. Both him and Best would be perfect compliments to Grant. Think about how explosive that would make our defense.

Then again, it could all be a smokescreen.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

"Rockmolder" wrote:

I don't think you move up a dozen or so spots to draft a back to compliment your just above average back.

Pack93z
Select Member

15 years ago

They won't do it.. Damn Thompson is to damn cheap to make a move like that.. haven't you all learned a damn thing.

There.. Hazer was posting all together too damn rational in this thread.. someone has got to add the Hazer edge. 😉

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

dhazer
Veteran Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

well thanks alot PackZ I was trying to hold off till Thursday morning lol 😛 I will be back to normal Thursday night 😃

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

The Hazers Edge.

dhazer
Veteran Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

Or could we trade with Jacksonville and move up there and thats where you grab Spiller because the Jags would like to trade down and draft Tebow. I think that would be the most realistic trade partner because we wouldn't have to fork out that top 5 money.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Stevetarded
Registered

15 years ago

#10

To trade up that far they have to be looking at one of the positions that are a need. Probably one of the OTs like Williams or Bulaga. If not OT it would be one of the elite players like Berry, Spiller, or even Earl Campbell.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (1h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (5h) : meh

Zero2Cool (10h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (10h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (10h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (13h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (13h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (16h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (16h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24