14 years ago
I would like Westbrook. The problem is that we already have 2 backs we most likely need to keep, and the draft is very deep in RBs. I guess I'd wait to see how the draft panned out and then, if we don't get a back, sign him up.

What's he like picking up blitzes? Anyone know? He's undersized and I can't imagine he's going to want to dive at legs after taking that knee to the helmet.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

What's he like picking up blitzes? Anyone know? He's undersized and I can't imagine he's going to want to dive at legs after taking that knee to the helmet.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




I'm reminded of an article from Sports Illustrated on concussions, where they interviewed Michael Strahan when he was still playing. He talked about an incident with Westbrook, where he was rushing and saw Westbrook staying back to block him. He says the next thing he (Strahan) remembered was trying to get up off his behind while Westbrook stood over him taunting him.

He added that in the game today, you have guys like that (referring to Westbrook) who are much stronger than they look (and went to talk about how the speed at which the game is played and these more explosive players all work to produce an environment where concussions are getting more common).

So from that, I'd have to think he's at least a decent blocker, and would be alright in blitz pick-up.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago
Also... people are actually worried that we may overpay for Westbrook.

REALLY? Are you serious? Do you even remember that Ted is still the GM of this team?

Yes Ted has made some bad signings in the past, but ... the dude is notorious for not over paying. If the price tag for Westbrook is high, you really think Ted will pull the trigger?

As NSD said, for years Westbrook was the entire Eagles' offense. He is pretty versatile, I mean you're talking about a RB who routinely motioned out to become a WR. And he regularly ran routes, made catches.

When people talk about finding a weapon like Harvin... I'd say that Westbrook was doing what Harvin did long before Harvin did it last year. If you believe all we are missing is a versatile WR/RB weapon ... you have to have your eyes light up when you hear the Packers are kicking the tires on signing Westbrook.


Now there are concerns, like Rock has repeatedly mentioned, on whether Westbrook can remain healthy and whether he has the legs to play at a high level. Those are valid concerns, and I expect the Packers to do their due diligence to make sure he can still contribute something. If Westbrook has something left in the tank, then I'm all for this signing.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Dulak
14 years ago

Also... people are actually worried that we may overpay for Westbrook.

REALLY? Are you serious? Do you even remember that Ted is still the GM of this team?

Yes Ted has made some bad signings in the past, but ... the dude is notorious for not over paying. If the price tag for Westbrook is high, you really think Ted will pull the trigger?

As NSD said, for years Westbrook was the entire Eagles' offense. He is pretty versatile, I mean you're talking about a RB who routinely motioned out to become a WR. And he regularly ran routes, made catches.

When people talk about finding a weapon like Harvin... I'd say that Westbrook was doing what Harvin did long before Harvin did it last year. If you believe all we are missing is a versatile WR/RB weapon ... you have to have your eyes light up when you hear the Packers are kicking the tires on signing Westbrook.


Now there are concerns, like Rock has repeatedly mentioned, on whether Westbrook can remain healthy and whether he has the legs to play at a high level. Those are valid concerns, and I expect the Packers to do their due diligence to make sure he can still contribute something. If Westbrook has something left in the tank, then I'm all for this signing.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



liked what you had to say - a few comments thou. As far as Ted and him paying ...

I wouldnt doubt if some people started to change their minds on what Ted will pay.

We can take a look at jennings, chillars, the salary we gave to collins, pickett, and clifton. Heck didnt he double bush's salary last year when most of us hated him and wanted him off the team and would of been happy if st lois or (forgot whom else was looking at him) would take him off our hands.

Im not sure we can say that Ted is a real skimper when it comes to signing peeps. Or maybe just new peeps ... who knows. Only thing I know we spent alot of money recently when previously we were one of the few teams well below the cap (ie I know there is no cap this year).
porky88
14 years ago
Westbrook wouldn't make more than Grant so find his numbers this year and you can figure something out probably a lot easier. It'd be incentive base.

I would like the move. It gives the Packers a veteran who has been there before and he's legit third down back. He could be a real factor in the passing game. Rodgers checks down a lot so he needs that safety valve. Grant isn't that type of player.
zombieslayer
14 years ago



I'm reminded of an article from Sports Illustrated on concussions, where they interviewed Michael Strahan when he was still playing. He talked about an incident with Westbrook, where he was rushing and saw Westbrook staying back to block him. He says the next thing he (Strahan) remembered was trying to get up off his behind while Westbrook stood over him taunting him.

He added that in the game today, you have guys like that (referring to Westbrook) who are much stronger than they look (and went to talk about how the speed at which the game is played and these more explosive players all work to produce an environment where concussions are getting more common).

So from that, I'd have to think he's at least a decent blocker, and would be alright in blitz pick-up.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Whoa. Did not know that. That changes my views on Westbrook big time, as I want to see Aaron touched a heck of a lot less in '10.

Then if the price is right and if he's healthy, let's get him. I've always liked Westbrook as a pass catcher. After all, that's what RBs should be used for anyways. 😉
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
I think if we fail to add a scat back type in the draft.. Westbrook will be our safety value.

Not a bad plan B in that case.. under the right contract numbers and understanding of his role in the offense.. something Green did very well last season.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Rockmolder
14 years ago
Brian Westbrook will take a physical in St. Louis 

by Mike Florio

After a couple of months on the shelf, running back Brian Westbrook could soon be getting a chance to continue his career.

Jason La Canfora of NFLN reports that Westbrook will go to St. Louis today for a physical with the Rams.

Of course, it remains to be seen whether he can pass a physical. Westbrook's knee has been a major problem of late. He also missed multiple games due to concussions in 2009.

The Packers also reportedly are interested.

zombieslayer
14 years ago
Bummer.

So I guess there goes that idea. 😞
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rockmolder
14 years ago
Rams in "way, way early" stages of evaluating Westbrook 

by Michael David Smith

The St. Louis Rams brought free agent running back Brian Westbrook in for a physical this weekend, but head coach Steve Spagnuolo said that doesn't mean a signing is imminent.

"Brian's in here because we want to do the physical, we want to do that part of it," Spagnuolo said, per the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. "But then we'll see where it goes from there. It's way, way early in the stage."

It wasn't long ago that Westbrook would have been considered a major free-agent acquisition for any NFL team, let alone the worst team in the league. But at age 30, and coming off a season in which he had just 274 rushing yards, Westbrook seems like more of an afterthought than a priority for the Rams.

Of course, it's a moot point if Westbrook, who has a history of knee problems and concussions, can't pass the physical.

Fan Shout
Martha Careful (17h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (17h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Rude!
beast (22h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

17h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.