RaiderPride
14 years ago
Just for fun... And I am curious about the answers that will come forward here....

In a fun way of asking a question in a different manner (Instead of what is the value of Aaron Rodgers.) here is the question...

If the Rams offered their First, Second, and Third picks in this years draft plus K. Bollor would you take the trade?
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
My answer to this question is simple: Are there any quarterbacks in the league or the draft who would represent a significant upgrade over Rodgers? No? Then no, I wouldn't take such a trade.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
No.

The market value for Rodgers would exceed the 2 firsts that the Bears coughed up for Cutler.

Rodgers numbers exceed Cutlers and his palatable contract would be very attractive to a suitor.

I would take a blockbuster type offer for the Packers even to consider it.. and then they may still turn it down.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Yes, good point. That was something I forgot to mention. I think at this point, Rodgers would be worth more than two first-round picks. So a first, second, and third certainly wouldn't cut it.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago
ya see the thing is we know what rodgers is like and we know what he is like on our team. Anyone we draft is a unknown ... IMO noway worth it.

Where we going to find a proven QB that has taken us the the playoffs in his 2nd year as a starter?

Not like the dude is old ...
14 years ago
I think he's invaluable to the team. I wouldn't even consider 3 1sts.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
No way I'd take that 1/2/3 deal., RP.

For me to consider it, it would take a minimum of three first rounders. And I'm not even sure I'd pull the trigger then.

Maybe three first rounders and a starting LT.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Dulak
14 years ago

No way I'd take that 1/2/3 deal., RP.

For me to consider it, it would take a minimum of three first rounders. And I'm not even sure I'd pull the trigger then.

Maybe three first rounders and a starting LT.

"Wade" wrote:



Suh Clausen and spiller/or berry and then some starting LT might be fun.
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago
When you talk about Rodgers, you're talking about a guy that can be immensely special. Ron Wolf told McGinn early on in the off-season that based on his evaluation of Rodgers, there is nothing (mentally or physically) holding him back from at least challenging Favre's records.

Now you can win the superbowl with less than special QBs, but Rodgers has this quality about him that he can do more with less... that is to say he can be like the greats and make others around him better. To me, having that especially at the most important position in the game, is worth much more than 3 1sts.

Only way I could ever consider trading Rodgers is we have drafted a young QB that has shown himself over time to be a good player at least. For example, if we draft Colt McCoy (strictly because he is BPA) and in a couple of years has shown he can hang with the big boys.... then maybe I begin to consider trading Aaron.

Otherwise ... Aaron can lead you to big places. Add to that his contract is an amazing bargain... and his value is pretty darn high.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
You don't trade a young quarterback who is only reaching his peak while being a top 5 QB.

But if there was some sort of falling out, I imagine three 1sts would be the minimum.
This is a placeholder
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (9m) : Merry Christmas!
beast (8h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (16h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (21h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (23h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.