Nice to know HC and assistants may not be on same page with respect to one of the three OL people are most optimistic about.
:(
"Wade" wrote:
Exactly what I was thinking Wade. They still seem to be indecisive in regards to how to fix our OL.
"RaiderPride" wrote:
I love it.
There better well be more than one person who has a voice, and can voice that opinion during the off season. That tells me there is no dictatorship in the coaching staff of my Green Bay Packers.
By the time Camp is closing.. They will all be united on the task, and will have known that their voice was heard. That is called positive management.
"TheEngineer" wrote:
I must respectfully disagree.
This is not year one of the McCarthy era. This is coming up on year five. This is not year two of the Thompson era. This is coming up on year six.
This is not a disagreement about the backup of an offensive line without substantial questions.
This is a disagreement about the best place to put the person who is arguably, right now, the third best offensive lineman on the roster. And even if one believes not just Sitton and Wells are better but that Clifton and Tauscher are as well, the way people are talking about Lang and his "technique and attitude and potential", five years into McCarthy's tenure, he and his coaches should not be having this kind of disagreement.
What is good management in year one or year two is evidence of managerial failure in year five.
"Wade" wrote: