zombieslayer
15 years ago
I didn't want to hijack Porforis' thread so I started a new one.

We really need a National Sales Tax. Seriously, screw the IRS. It shouldn't exist. NOBODY except for you and your employer (and your Mom) should know how much money you make and what you spend it on. It's a privacy issue mostly.

Also though, besides just privacy, things like what happened to Porforis shouldn't happen. I feel really bad. He's now in paperwork hell. I've heard others go through similar experiences. I had a correction once and it cost me $200. Not a large amount of money but it's out of general principle. A waste of time and money.

So instead of the IRS, what do you all think of a National Sales Tax? It's a consumption tax. I've heard folks say it hurts the poor but food is exempt. Also, the more money you make, the more you end up spending anyways. No system is fair. Heck, I could go on and on about how unfair our current system is, how it screws over Californians and New Yorkers and rewards people in more inexpensive states.

So much time would be saved. So much less hassle. So much more privacy. Imagine the paperwork saved.

Discuss.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
15 years ago
It is gaining momentum ... Washington Post article about talks on the hill ..

I think the hidden benefit of it all.. is that it will encourage people to save more.. thus creating less of the "dangerous" spender that live beyond their mean.

Of course those in government would find a way to offset the benefits with some type of spending.

A VAT's Bottom Line

What would it cost? Emanuel argues in his book that a 10 percent VAT would pay for every American not entitled to Medicare or Medicaid to enroll in a health plan with no deductibles and minimal copayments. In his 2008 book, "100 Million Unnecessary Returns," Yale law professor Michael J. Graetz estimates that a VAT of 10 to 14 percent would raise enough money to exempt families earning less than $100,000 -- about 90 percent of households -- from the income tax and would lower rates for everyone else.

And in a paper published last month in the Virginia Tax Review, Burman suggests that a 25 percent VAT could do it all: Pay for health-care reform, balance the federal budget and exempt millions of families from the income tax while slashing the top rate to 25 percent. A gallon of milk would jump from $3.69 to $4.61, and a $5,000 bathroom renovation would suddenly cost $6,250, but the nation's debt would stabilize and everybody could see a doctor.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Yeah, but is that a VAT in lieu of all the other taxes we're paying or a VAT on top of them?
UserPostedImage
Porforis
15 years ago
But... But... What about all these rich bankers/insurance company CEOs/Oil tycoons that everyone loves to bash that don't spend that much of their money on taxable goods?

Seriously though, would there still be capital gains taxes? A flat sales tax would be simpler, but I just don't see it happening.
Porforis
15 years ago

It is gaining momentum ... Washington Post article about talks on the hill ..

I think the hidden benefit of it all.. is that it will encourage people to save more.. thus creating less of the "dangerous" spender that live beyond their mean.

Of course those in government would find a way to offset the benefits with some type of spending.

A VAT's Bottom Line

What would it cost? Emanuel argues in his book that a 10 percent VAT would pay for every American not entitled to Medicare or Medicaid to enroll in a health plan with no deductibles and minimal copayments. In his 2008 book, "100 Million Unnecessary Returns," Yale law professor Michael J. Graetz estimates that a VAT of 10 to 14 percent would raise enough money to exempt families earning less than $100,000 -- about 90 percent of households -- from the income tax and would lower rates for everyone else.

And in a paper published last month in the Virginia Tax Review, Burman suggests that a 25 percent VAT could do it all: Pay for health-care reform, balance the federal budget and exempt millions of families from the income tax while slashing the top rate to 25 percent. A gallon of milk would jump from $3.69 to $4.61, and a $5,000 bathroom renovation would suddenly cost $6,250, but the nation's debt would stabilize and everybody could see a doctor.

"pack93z" wrote:



Ugh... The last person in the world I'd trust is Rahm Emanuel or his brother... What a snake. Also, there's a difference between health coverage and health care - just because the government is paying for health insurance doesn't mean you'll be able to see a doctor, now, and with good quality care. This is why simply having the government take over the health care industry isn't going to fix things. I like the basic premise of having a flat sales tax, but I simply don't trust the government to implement it in a way that is efficient or fair.
Formo
15 years ago
Fair tax. I like your thinking, ZS.

You say people claim it wouldn't be fair to the poor. Uhh. A) Life's not fair and 😎 it IS fair. They pay taxes based on how much they spend. Because they are poor, they don't spend much. Because they don't spend much, they don't pay as much.

On the flip side, you have the millionare types. They are going to buy houses, cars, etc. Guess what? They will pay the same % as everyone else, but they'll still be paying more in. They like it because it's fair. We like it because they are still 'funding' the system.

I don't see any downfall to a Fair Tax-type system, except it takes money away from our politicians pockets. Thus, why we'll never see something like it.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
TheEngineer
15 years ago
We recently (2000) had the introduction of a VAT tax, known as Goods and Services Tax in Australia, on top of normal income tax and other statutory taxes such as Medicare, CGT, fringe benefits etc.

I really do not think it would work on its own. Some sort of income tax is typically essential as they are progressive taxes which have the effect of taxing rich people more. A flat tax such as VAT tends to work regressively, since people with high income are taxed less for any given item. They definitely earn more but that does not mean they definitely spend more.

Secondly, with any taxation, regulatory and enforcement bodies are required to ensure the correct monitoring and enforcement of taxation. Yes, there are a lot of costs associated with that, and many hours wasted. The IRS would still be required for monitoring company taxation, anyway.

Additionally, consumption is, if I recall correctly, an important statistical figure for economics, and introducing something that will retard spending isn't something to be taken lightly.

Yes, the whole tax system is overly complicated and a massive burden on an individual. I just hope eventually we do away with needlessly complex taxation laws and move towards streamlining the measurement and payment of tax.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
The U.S. Constitution mandates an amazingly streamlined form of taxation -- apportionment by state -- but we've gone and royally screwed it up.

Unfortunately, I'm packing for a weeklong drill -- blah -- so I don't have time to write a treatise on this topic. I definitely want to, though.
UserPostedImage
Formo
15 years ago

The U.S. Constitution mandates an amazingly streamlined form of taxation -- apportionment by state -- but we've gone and royally screwed it up.

Unfortunately, I'm packing for a weeklong drill -- blah -- so I don't have time to write a treatise on this topic. I definitely want to, though.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Damnit. Have fun. I want to see a 2 page report on this topic when you return.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
Two questions:

1. We trust the "guvmint" to administer a sales tax more than we trust it to administer an "income tax" because...?

2. A sales tax will encourage government responsibility how?

I have no trouble with abolishing the IRS. Or the income tax. Or both.

But I fail to see how giving to more taxing ability who have shown they have zero financial responsibility makes any sense at all.

I might be bankrupt. But I'm supposed to trust Charles Ponzi to get me out of bankruptcy.

Taxes do not solve problems. Taxes merely shift who pays for them.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
beast (10m) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (19m) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (35m) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (36m) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (42m) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (2h) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (4h) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Zero2Cool (4h) : what is Schefter saying?
dfosterf (4h) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
dfosterf (4h) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Mucky Tundra (11h) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
Mucky Tundra (11h) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
dfosterf (16h) : *Orzech*
dfosterf (16h) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
Zero2Cool (17h) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
Zero2Cool (17h) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
wpr (17h) : YES!!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (17h) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
Zero2Cool (18h) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
Zero2Cool (18h) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
wpr (19h) : He played pretty good.
Zero2Cool (19h) : NAZIR STACKHOUSE HAS MADE THE 53
Zero2Cool (20h) : NOOOOO KALEN IS GONE
Zero2Cool (20h) : Kalen King and Kamal Hadden making it. me thinks
schroeder84 (20h) : @dfosterf I suspect Elgersma WILL be hard to hide. Raw, but talented
Zero2Cool (22h) : pp.com is broken, halt testing, gotta go do work things for a bit
hardrocker950 (22h) : Mecole Hardman was released, to the surprise of few
Zero2Cool (23h) : PP.com updated. Reset Password works, and now User Profile pages are a thing
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Soft hope plan is having fantasy football weekly on-site that i build. cannot do that with this setup.
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It's older technology, resource hog, cannot be upgraded/changed. That's to start.
packerfanoutwest (25-Aug) : Ok, but what is wrong with this site?
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : check out packerpeople.com
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Oh crap I missed that! I thought it was a 2026 pick
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It wasn't even next year pick, it's two years away. old dog food value
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Yep! Everytime a team trades with Howie that team is the loser (so says the media)
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : We are hosed.
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Per Schefter, GB is sending a 6th rounder for OT Darian Kennard
Zero2Cool (24-Aug) : Finally got new site to keep folks logged in. New tech is pain sometimes
dfosterf (23-Aug) : Taylor Elgersma is going to be very hard to hide.
Mucky Tundra (23-Aug) : Matthew Golden=DAWG (so load the wagons!!) !!!!!
dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.