zombieslayer
14 years ago
I didn't want to hijack Porforis' thread so I started a new one.

We really need a National Sales Tax. Seriously, screw the IRS. It shouldn't exist. NOBODY except for you and your employer (and your Mom) should know how much money you make and what you spend it on. It's a privacy issue mostly.

Also though, besides just privacy, things like what happened to Porforis shouldn't happen. I feel really bad. He's now in paperwork hell. I've heard others go through similar experiences. I had a correction once and it cost me $200. Not a large amount of money but it's out of general principle. A waste of time and money.

So instead of the IRS, what do you all think of a National Sales Tax? It's a consumption tax. I've heard folks say it hurts the poor but food is exempt. Also, the more money you make, the more you end up spending anyways. No system is fair. Heck, I could go on and on about how unfair our current system is, how it screws over Californians and New Yorkers and rewards people in more inexpensive states.

So much time would be saved. So much less hassle. So much more privacy. Imagine the paperwork saved.

Discuss.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
14 years ago
It is gaining momentum ... Washington Post article about talks on the hill ..

I think the hidden benefit of it all.. is that it will encourage people to save more.. thus creating less of the "dangerous" spender that live beyond their mean.

Of course those in government would find a way to offset the benefits with some type of spending.

A VAT's Bottom Line

What would it cost? Emanuel argues in his book that a 10 percent VAT would pay for every American not entitled to Medicare or Medicaid to enroll in a health plan with no deductibles and minimal copayments. In his 2008 book, "100 Million Unnecessary Returns," Yale law professor Michael J. Graetz estimates that a VAT of 10 to 14 percent would raise enough money to exempt families earning less than $100,000 -- about 90 percent of households -- from the income tax and would lower rates for everyone else.

And in a paper published last month in the Virginia Tax Review, Burman suggests that a 25 percent VAT could do it all: Pay for health-care reform, balance the federal budget and exempt millions of families from the income tax while slashing the top rate to 25 percent. A gallon of milk would jump from $3.69 to $4.61, and a $5,000 bathroom renovation would suddenly cost $6,250, but the nation's debt would stabilize and everybody could see a doctor.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Yeah, but is that a VAT in lieu of all the other taxes we're paying or a VAT on top of them?
UserPostedImage
Porforis
14 years ago
But... But... What about all these rich bankers/insurance company CEOs/Oil tycoons that everyone loves to bash that don't spend that much of their money on taxable goods?

Seriously though, would there still be capital gains taxes? A flat sales tax would be simpler, but I just don't see it happening.
Porforis
14 years ago

It is gaining momentum ... Washington Post article about talks on the hill ..

I think the hidden benefit of it all.. is that it will encourage people to save more.. thus creating less of the "dangerous" spender that live beyond their mean.

Of course those in government would find a way to offset the benefits with some type of spending.

A VAT's Bottom Line

What would it cost? Emanuel argues in his book that a 10 percent VAT would pay for every American not entitled to Medicare or Medicaid to enroll in a health plan with no deductibles and minimal copayments. In his 2008 book, "100 Million Unnecessary Returns," Yale law professor Michael J. Graetz estimates that a VAT of 10 to 14 percent would raise enough money to exempt families earning less than $100,000 -- about 90 percent of households -- from the income tax and would lower rates for everyone else.

And in a paper published last month in the Virginia Tax Review, Burman suggests that a 25 percent VAT could do it all: Pay for health-care reform, balance the federal budget and exempt millions of families from the income tax while slashing the top rate to 25 percent. A gallon of milk would jump from $3.69 to $4.61, and a $5,000 bathroom renovation would suddenly cost $6,250, but the nation's debt would stabilize and everybody could see a doctor.

"pack93z" wrote:



Ugh... The last person in the world I'd trust is Rahm Emanuel or his brother... What a snake. Also, there's a difference between health coverage and health care - just because the government is paying for health insurance doesn't mean you'll be able to see a doctor, now, and with good quality care. This is why simply having the government take over the health care industry isn't going to fix things. I like the basic premise of having a flat sales tax, but I simply don't trust the government to implement it in a way that is efficient or fair.
Formo
14 years ago
Fair tax. I like your thinking, ZS.

You say people claim it wouldn't be fair to the poor. Uhh. A) Life's not fair and 😎 it IS fair. They pay taxes based on how much they spend. Because they are poor, they don't spend much. Because they don't spend much, they don't pay as much.

On the flip side, you have the millionare types. They are going to buy houses, cars, etc. Guess what? They will pay the same % as everyone else, but they'll still be paying more in. They like it because it's fair. We like it because they are still 'funding' the system.

I don't see any downfall to a Fair Tax-type system, except it takes money away from our politicians pockets. Thus, why we'll never see something like it.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
TheEngineer
14 years ago
We recently (2000) had the introduction of a VAT tax, known as Goods and Services Tax in Australia, on top of normal income tax and other statutory taxes such as Medicare, CGT, fringe benefits etc.

I really do not think it would work on its own. Some sort of income tax is typically essential as they are progressive taxes which have the effect of taxing rich people more. A flat tax such as VAT tends to work regressively, since people with high income are taxed less for any given item. They definitely earn more but that does not mean they definitely spend more.

Secondly, with any taxation, regulatory and enforcement bodies are required to ensure the correct monitoring and enforcement of taxation. Yes, there are a lot of costs associated with that, and many hours wasted. The IRS would still be required for monitoring company taxation, anyway.

Additionally, consumption is, if I recall correctly, an important statistical figure for economics, and introducing something that will retard spending isn't something to be taken lightly.

Yes, the whole tax system is overly complicated and a massive burden on an individual. I just hope eventually we do away with needlessly complex taxation laws and move towards streamlining the measurement and payment of tax.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
The U.S. Constitution mandates an amazingly streamlined form of taxation -- apportionment by state -- but we've gone and royally screwed it up.

Unfortunately, I'm packing for a weeklong drill -- blah -- so I don't have time to write a treatise on this topic. I definitely want to, though.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

The U.S. Constitution mandates an amazingly streamlined form of taxation -- apportionment by state -- but we've gone and royally screwed it up.

Unfortunately, I'm packing for a weeklong drill -- blah -- so I don't have time to write a treatise on this topic. I definitely want to, though.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Damnit. Have fun. I want to see a 2 page report on this topic when you return.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Two questions:

1. We trust the "guvmint" to administer a sales tax more than we trust it to administer an "income tax" because...?

2. A sales tax will encourage government responsibility how?

I have no trouble with abolishing the IRS. Or the income tax. Or both.

But I fail to see how giving to more taxing ability who have shown they have zero financial responsibility makes any sense at all.

I might be bankrupt. But I'm supposed to trust Charles Ponzi to get me out of bankruptcy.

Taxes do not solve problems. Taxes merely shift who pays for them.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (20h) : QB coach Sean Mannion
Zero2Cool (21h) : DL Coach DeMarcus Covington
dfosterf (23h) : from ft Belvoir, Quantico and points south. Somber reminder of this tragedy at Reagan Nat Airport
dfosterf (23h) : So eerily quiet here in Alexandria. I live in the flight path of commercial craft coming from the south and west, plus the military craft
dfosterf (23h) : So eeri
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Now that's a thought, maybe they're looking at the college ranks? Maybe not head coaches but DC/assistant DCs with league experience?
beast (30-Jan) : College Coaches wouldn't want that publicly, as it would hurt recruiting and they might not get the job.
beast (30-Jan) : I thought they were supposed to publicly announce them, at least the NFL ones. Hafley was from college, so I believe different rules.
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Who knows who they're interviewing? I mean, nobody knew about Hafley and then out of nowhere he was hired
beast (30-Jan) : I wonder what's taking so long with hiring a DL coach, 2 of the 3 known to interview have already been hired elsewhere.
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Packers coach Matt LaFleur hires Luke Getsy as senior assistant, extends Rich Bisaccia's deal
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (27-Jan) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : I think this games over
beast (26-Jan) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.