Stevetarded
14 years ago

I have approximately 50 "ifs" going simultaneously.

We need another safety. We need another cornerback. We are DEAD without a left tackle. We need heat opposite Clay at OLB. Will the Saints want to hold onto Jamaal Brown-Is he going to be healthy? What about Kampy and NO--- They are a 4-3...Can we tag and bag him to them for Jamaal? What about Penn? Tampa is grousing because he's a fat lazy SOB.

Will the Iowa LT be on the board, do we go up to get him? Do I want Brown, and if I do, do I want to keep Cliffy (yes, for a year, along with Tausch) Do I still want a FA LT (yes). Is Lang a RT or a LG. I think LT, but I want to really see if he's a LG. What do I want them to pay to retain Colledge (that inconsistent c#cks...) Why does everyone think Spitz is so friggin' great? Is he any good?

"dfosterf" wrote:



I say if a decent enough FA LT that is young becomes available then go after him. Otherwise resign Cliffy for at least a year and draft a LT in the 1st who wont be forced to start immediately. If a very good player (like Rodgers did) besides something obvious like a QB or WR falls to 23 in the draft take them and get a LT in the 2nd. You aren't going to get a "elite" LT prospect at 23 anyways so the only real option is a guy that probably wont be "start ready" anyways. Use a later pick on a "backup plan" tackle so you have 2 options.

I think we can squeeze another year out of Clifton and give our new LT a chance to learn but even if Clifton falls apart Lang can fill in for a period of time as plan B. I see no reason to not give Tauscher a contract. He played well and that was even after jumping in halfway through the season after having major surgery.

Spitz was awesome when he was at RG he is good at both pass and run blocking and rarely commits penalties. He also was very consistent, I believe he gave up the least amount of sacks of all our lineman in 2008. No reason to let a player like that go. Wells had a good year so get Spitz in at LG and back up C and let Colledge go.

Going into training camp with Clifton-Spitz-Wells-Sitton-Tausch wouldn't upset me with some LT prospects/FA and Lang ready to compete for positions on the line. It also leaves you with some decent depth for once. Unlike Barbre we know all of these starters can play when they are healthy.
blank
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

Taylor Mays, Safety out of USC. The dude can play. His 40 time has been clocked at a sub 4.3. Plus the guy can hit. Just imagine having him and Nick Collins roaming back there. Any deep ball would be in danger of getting picked.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



He's an Al Davis player. He looks too much like Roy Williams out there for me to trust him.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Exactly what I was thinking. I'd prefer a cover safety. Of course, he has to be able to tackle, but I'd prefer to have a Nick Collins back there, rather than a Roy Williams.

Collins is great in coverage and can tackle quite well. Roy Williams is great at tackling and playing in the box, but I'd rather have Nick Barnett play deep in a cover 2 than him.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



Barnett needs to work on that part of his game. Coverage over the middle was our biggest weakness. LBers play to shallow and don't drop quick enough.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Taylor Mays, Safety out of USC. The dude can play. His 40 time has been clocked at a sub 4.3. Plus the guy can hit. Just imagine having him and Nick Collins roaming back there. Any deep ball would be in danger of getting picked.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



He's an Al Davis player. He looks too much like Roy Williams out there for me to trust him.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Exactly what I was thinking. I'd prefer a cover safety. Of course, he has to be able to tackle, but I'd prefer to have a Nick Collins back there, rather than a Roy Williams.

Collins is great in coverage and can tackle quite well. Roy Williams is great at tackling and playing in the box, but I'd rather have Nick Barnett play deep in a cover 2 than him.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Barnett needs to work on that part of his game. Coverage over the middle was our biggest weakness. LBers play to shallow and don't drop quick enough.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



Exactly. So I think that says enough about how much I'd like for us to pick a safety who resembles Roy Williams.
dfosterf
14 years ago

I have approximately 50 "ifs" going simultaneously.

We need another safety. We need another cornerback. We are DEAD without a left tackle. We need heat opposite Clay at OLB. Will the Saints want to hold onto Jamaal Brown-Is he going to be healthy? What about Kampy and NO--- They are a 4-3...Can we tag and bag him to them for Jamaal? What about Penn? Tampa is grousing because he's a fat lazy SOB.

Will the Iowa LT be on the board, do we go up to get him? Do I want Brown, and if I do, do I want to keep Cliffy (yes, for a year, along with Tausch) Do I still want a FA LT (yes). Is Lang a RT or a LG. I think LT, but I want to really see if he's a LG. What do I want them to pay to retain Colledge (that inconsistent c#cks...) Why does everyone think Spitz is so friggin' great? Is he any good?

"Stevetarded" wrote:



I say if a decent enough FA LT that is young becomes available then go after him. Otherwise resign Cliffy for at least a year and draft a LT in the 1st who wont be forced to start immediately. If a very good player (like Rodgers did) besides something obvious like a QB or WR falls to 23 in the draft take them and get a LT in the 2nd. You aren't going to get a "elite" LT prospect at 23 anyways so the only real option is a guy that probably wont be "start ready" anyways. Use a later pick on a "backup plan" tackle so you have 2 options.

I think we can squeeze another year out of Clifton and give our new LT a chance to learn but even if Clifton falls apart Lang can fill in for a period of time as plan B. I see no reason to not give Tauscher a contract. He played well and that was even after jumping in halfway through the season after having major surgery.

Spitz was awesome when he was at RG he is good at both pass and run blocking and rarely commits penalties. He also was very consistent, I believe he gave up the least amount of sacks of all our lineman in 2008. No reason to let a player like that go. Wells had a good year so get Spitz in at LG and back up C and let Colledge go.

Going into training camp with Clifton-Spitz-Wells-Sitton-Tausch wouldn't upset me with some LT prospects/FA and Lang ready to compete for positions on the line. It also leaves you with some decent depth for once. Unlike Barbre we know all of these starters can play when they are healthy.

"dfosterf" wrote:



+1 for attempting to answer some of my rambling, lol

I meant RT on Lang, btw. Mis-posted. I don't think he is an LT. That could be the one thing that is driving me most "nuts". SO MANY think he is. I don't LIKE IT. I lean A LOT towards RT for Lang. I want him pumping steel RFN, btw.

Anyway, I'm going to start rambling again...thanks (again) for addressing some of my paranoia :thumbleft:
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago

Taylor Mays, Safety out of USC. The dude can play. His 40 time has been clocked at a sub 4.3. Plus the guy can hit. Just imagine having him and Nick Collins roaming back there. Any deep ball would be in danger of getting picked.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



He's an Al Davis player. He looks too much like Roy Williams out there for me to trust him.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Exactly what I was thinking. I'd prefer a cover safety. Of course, he has to be able to tackle, but I'd prefer to have a Nick Collins back there, rather than a Roy Williams.

Collins is great in coverage and can tackle quite well. Roy Williams is great at tackling and playing in the box, but I'd rather have Nick Barnett play deep in a cover 2 than him.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



Well, we all know I have man love for Mays, but I still think that his coverage issues can be coached out of him, at least for the most part. If the guy's really sub 4.3, he's got recovery speed - he reminds me more of Sean Taylor than Roy Williams. If you think about it, Collins plays some questionable angles himself; and he makes up for it with his speed.

Of course, if he really does have sub-4.3 speed he'll be off the board long before the Pack would have a shot at him, so it's a moot conversation.
blank
Bigbyfan
14 years ago

Taylor Mays, Safety out of USC. The dude can play. His 40 time has been clocked at a sub 4.3. Plus the guy can hit. Just imagine having him and Nick Collins roaming back there. Any deep ball would be in danger of getting picked.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



He's an Al Davis player. He looks too much like Roy Williams out there for me to trust him.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Exactly what I was thinking. I'd prefer a cover safety. Of course, he has to be able to tackle, but I'd prefer to have a Nick Collins back there, rather than a Roy Williams.

Collins is great in coverage and can tackle quite well. Roy Williams is great at tackling and playing in the box, but I'd rather have Nick Barnett play deep in a cover 2 than him.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Well, we all know I have man love for Mays, but I still think that his coverage issues can be coached out of him, at least for the most part. If the guy's really sub 4.3, he's got recovery speed - he reminds me more of Sean Taylor than Roy Williams. If you think about it, Collins plays some questionable angles himself; and he makes up for it with his speed.

Of course, if he really does have sub-4.3 speed he'll be off the board long before the Pack would have a shot at him, so it's a moot conversation.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



I know it's way too early, but mock draft having landing around our spot in the draft.

If people don't want Mays, I have no problem taking Jahvid Best. Having him paired with Ryan Grant would pack a nice 1-2 punch.
blank
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago

Taylor Mays, Safety out of USC. The dude can play. His 40 time has been clocked at a sub 4.3. Plus the guy can hit. Just imagine having him and Nick Collins roaming back there. Any deep ball would be in danger of getting picked.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



He's an Al Davis player. He looks too much like Roy Williams out there for me to trust him.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Exactly what I was thinking. I'd prefer a cover safety. Of course, he has to be able to tackle, but I'd prefer to have a Nick Collins back there, rather than a Roy Williams.

Collins is great in coverage and can tackle quite well. Roy Williams is great at tackling and playing in the box, but I'd rather have Nick Barnett play deep in a cover 2 than him.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Well, we all know I have man love for Mays, but I still think that his coverage issues can be coached out of him, at least for the most part. If the guy's really sub 4.3, he's got recovery speed - he reminds me more of Sean Taylor than Roy Williams. If you think about it, Collins plays some questionable angles himself; and he makes up for it with his speed.

Of course, if he really does have sub-4.3 speed he'll be off the board long before the Pack would have a shot at him, so it's a moot conversation.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



I know it's way too early, but mock draft having landing around our spot in the draft.

If people don't want Mays, I have no problem taking Jahvid Best. Having him paired with Ryan Grant would pack a nice 1-2 punch.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:




I'm of the opinion that if he does the combine and his numbers are what they're rumored to be, he'll move back up. He's not getting the same love he did last year, but that has a lot to do with the USC defense not being nearly as good this year as last year. If he pops freakish numbers @ the combine and looks good in the Senior Bowl, he's going to challenge Berry and Thomas on some boards.

Based on what I know at this point (meaning I don't know if he's smart, if he's coachable, etc.), I'd be willing to bet that he could be coached up in terms of his coverage skills, and that speed will help immensely. Plus, you'd be plugging him in to a talented defensive squad and he demonstrated that he can shine in a good group. Given the current forecast, he looks like a great option at a position of need to me if he were somehow to be there. I'm not yet convinced that a LT will be around that isn't a reach at that pick, but I have seen mocks where there were some nice options for a rush LB there, and that's also something they need. I see RB being a position where there'll be some interesting options (McKnight, for one) in later rounds - especially if we're talking about a complementary back.
blank
14 years ago
I've never seen anyone get more than 2 picks correct on a Ted Thompson draft. You have to really consider value on the board and the likelyhood of a trade down.

Ideally Ted gets a quality CB, a quality OT and a backup. A DE, RB, Safety, TE, and a punter with his 8 picks.

The first pick has to be a CB or OT. Best on the board.

Remember the draft is for the future not just current needs.
blank
14 years ago

If we could somehow end up with 3 2nd round picks, I'd be thrilled. Kindle - Carimi - Cox would pretty much make for a dream draft.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Kindle was my player to scout for the day. I'm on the bandwagon. If he drops to us I hope he's high up on our board (he could potentially skyrocket in these next couple of months).
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

If we could somehow end up with 3 2nd round picks, I'd be thrilled. Kindle - Carimi - Cox would pretty much make for a dream draft.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Kindle was my player to scout for the day. I'm on the bandwagon. If he drops to us I hope he's high up on our board (he could potentially skyrocket in these next couple of months).

"Rockmolder" wrote:



I have to admit, after I made that post, I actually went a little off the bandwagon again. Didn't see him practicing since I was at work, but it's good to hear that he dominated. It's a defensive drill, though, so lets keep that in mind.

Another guy who absolutely dominated was Graham. I had him going at 32 in my mock draft. He's usually a low 1st, 2nd round guy in mock drafts right now. If he keeps going like this, though, he might just come out as one of the best DE/OLBs in this draft. The way it looks now, I'd hardly be dissapointed if we took a shot at him with the 23rd pick.

Most tackles for a loss and resembles Farrior. I would not mind picking him, at all.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (10h) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites
Zero2Cool (18h) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league
packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.
beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."
Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Bears get OL fixed amd we might have a problem
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Pretty sure they already have scouting reports on guys who aren't even starting for their college team. The future is now for me.
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : I tend to let Gute and Co. Worry about the future.
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Jaire and Evans Williams are both ACTIVE! Good news.
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : The badgers really need to change the whole offensive scheme. No draws no screens plus the quarterback is marginal
Cheesey (17-Nov) : If the Badgers had a decent QB, they would have won. The guy can't hit a wide open receiver
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : chop block
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : there was a very questionable job Block call that upon viewing replay was very borderline
beast (17-Nov) : How so? (I didn't watch)
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Badgers got hosed vs Oregon
packerfanoutwest (16-Nov) : damn,he hasn't played since week 2
Mucky Tundra (15-Nov) : poor guy can't catch a break
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.