You act like you've seen every Chargers game.
The guy is 25. He has room for mistakes. Like Rodgers, he hasn't even entered his prime yet.
You want to get a rookie, who's likely a mere three years younger than Cromartie who is guaranteed to make a lot more bonehead plays than Cromartie will.
"Use a 2nd on a CB."
LOL. The last time we drafted a good corner was Mike McKenzie. We all know how that turned out.
"blueleopard" wrote:
I make up my opinion on the plays and games that I have seen, not the ones I haven't. If you like him, I suppose that you've seen every Chargers game, as well? Makes just as little sense.
He might not have hit his prime, but he's been in the league for 4 years. By that time, you can usually see how a player turns out. The rookie mistakes should be gone, the boneheaded plays should be drastically reduced. He might be 25, but this is something totally else than a rookie.
The last time we drafted a good OT was in 2000. They're still starting. We've drafted quite a few after that in Barbre, Colledge etc. That didn't turn out too great. Maybe we should stay clear of drafting OTs, as well.
Next to that, Underwood has tons of potential. We drafted him just last year. We don't know about Lee yet. He's been banged up.
Where do you see Cromartie fitting in? I know that it's been said that he should be bumped to Nickel, but where do you want Williams? As our dime corner? The man is a potential starter on quite a few teams. I know that you want to get as deep a CB group as you can, but getting Cromartie is nowhere near a priority to us. With Woodson - Harris - Williams - Underwood - Lee - Blackmon - Bush I doubt that we even have to draft anyone.
I'll take those boneheaded rookie plays out of our 5th corner. I don't want my nickel/starter to make those same plays. Especially not after 4 years in the league. If you want to take him, you most likely go by a 2007 year in which he feasted on a lot of lesser players when he wasn't the starter and some flukey things that went his way. After seeing him as the real starter for 2 years after that, you can safely say that 2007 was nothing more than a fluke year.