Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Brett Christopherson column: Green Bay Packers can be thankful San Francisco 49ers passed on Aaron Rodgers 

GREEN BAY Since this is the week we're supposed to give thanks for our blessings, we'll use these column inches not to dwell on the latest injury news or that near second-half collapse, but to hand out a well-deserved game ball.

So here you go No. 12. You earned it.

"It's always good to get a win in this league," quarterback Aaron Rodgers said in matter-of-fact fashion after directing the Green Bay Packers to a 30-24 conquest of San Francisco on Sunday at Lambeau Field. "It's fun to play against a team that you idolized growing up and you watched every Sunday after church."

That's it? That's all you're giving us? No controversy? No smack talk? No sense of vindication? No wanting to "stick it" to the franchise that shunned you for keep the chuckling at a simmer, folks Alex Smith?

Can somebody please supply a little ammunition?

"Any time you go back home, as I will (this) week, you definitely want to win," receiver Greg Jennings said, referring to the trip to his native Michigan for Thursday's Thanksgiving Day contest against Detroit. "You definitely want to play well to show your fans back home that you've got a little something they wish they had where they're at."

That little something would be a franchise quarterback, a dude with elite physical tools and a mental toughness and coolness to match.

And he's all yours, Titletown. For at least the next decade barring any unforeseen setbacks, of course.

So, folks, go ahead and breathe a sigh of relief and add that to the list of "things to be thankful for." Rodgers could easily be sporting Niners red and gold instead of Packers green and gold.

Shudder the thought.

"He's everything this organization hoped he would be," left guard Daryn Colledge said of Rodgers, who sliced the San Francisco defense en route to a 344-yard, two-TD, 108.0-passer rating performance. "He's an amazing player. And if we can keep him upright, he's got a chance to be one of the best quarterbacks in this league."

While the primary storyline heading into Sunday's skirmish focused on the Packers' sudden playoff revival in the aftermath of last week's big W over Big D, the most intriguing subplot starred Rodgers and Smith.

As you may have heard, the two are forever conjoined given the circumstances of how the 2005 NFL Draft played out.

Here's the Cliffs Notes version: The Niners held the No. 1 pick that year and tabbed Smith over Rodgers, who played collegiately at nearby California and grew up close to San Francisco. Smith has since scuffled, while Rodgers, who plummeted to Green Bay at No. 24, has flourished.

In 34 starts, Smith has thrown 28 TDs and won 12 games, compared to 48 and 12, respectively, for Rodgers through 26 starts.

Sunday was the first game pitting the two quarterbacks, and Rodgers had his foot pressed on the gas from the outset, guiding the Packers to scores on five of their six first-half possessions to fill the most impressive 30 minutes of offensive football of the year and bring back images of those grandiose preseason days.

Rodgers, himself, threw for a single-half career-high 274 yards in a spurt that saw Green Bay open a 23-3 advantage as he took advantage of decent protection, a productive ground game and the return of tight end Jermichael Finley.

He played with patience, using his checkdowns and finding openings underneath. And he played with poise, completing passes to seven different receivers as the Packers churned out a season-high 484 total yards and went 10-of-18 in third-down efficiency, including six-of-nine in the first half, to extend drives.

His second quarter, 64-yard touchdown connection with Jennings on a slant route displayed Rodgers' growing mastery of the offense when he first looked right and then turned left and uncorked a BB through a small opening.

"It was actually perfect coverage," said Jennings, who finished with five catches for 126 yards. "He came back to me late, actually in the second window, and that was able to get me up the field more. And then I just turned it up and cut back on their safety."

Rodgers looked every bit the No. 1 overall pick, not to mention one of the top quarterbacks in the league. Smith? Not so much, save for a solid second half in which the Niners offensive staff thought it wise to get tight end Vernon Davis involved in the game plan.

But even more impressive than the stats and the slings was Rodgers' unwillingness to provide any interesting sound bites when asked about facing Smith and seeking payback against the team he once rooted for.

Much like he handled the Brett Favre saga, he managed this latest situation with grace and class.

No need to flap the gums. The play will do the talking, instead.

"I think Aaron takes every single game personally," Colledge said. "He's an extremely passionate player. He's exciting to play for. Maybe a little bit on the side, he had a little bit extra (motivation). But he was very professional with it about us and very motivational. He didn't freak out about it."

To be fair, Smith was thrust into the fray as a rookie, has suffered an injury to his throwing shoulder and has had to deal with a revolving door at offensive coordinator, while Rodgers had the benefit of serving as Favre's backup for his first three seasons.

But the clear winner in this debate is the Packers, a fact not lost within the victorious locker room.

"We're going to protect him the second half (of the season)," Colledge said. "And we're going to let everybody know who exactly Aaron Rodgers is. Because he's an extremely special player."


UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago
Hindsight. If they had taken Rodgers would Smith have slipped that far? Who knows who we would have taken instead, maybe even someone that could have led us to the Super Bowl with Favre. I'm not saying I'm not thankful, I'm very thankful we have Rodgers, I'm just saying hindsight is 20/20. Nobody knows for sure if Rodgers would have been as good as he is now if he went to the 49ers.
nerdmann
14 years ago

Hindsight. If they had taken Rodgers would Smith have slipped that far? Who knows who we would have taken instead, maybe even someone that could have led us to the Super Bowl with Favre. I'm not saying I'm not thankful, I'm very thankful we have Rodgers, I'm just saying hindsight is 20/20. Nobody knows for sure if Rodgers would have been as good as he is now if he went to the 49ers.

"djcubez" wrote:




Rodgers would be that good if he was brought along by MM. Mike McCarthy is a QB guru. One of the best in the league.
Meanwhile, Alex Smith has had what? 5 different offensive coordinators in 5 years? No QB could be good through all that.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
14 years ago
I still want to know the last time a QB led the league in passer rating and rushing yards (for QBs) at the midpoint of the season.
UserPostedImage
Trippster
14 years ago
MPF, currently, Favre leads the league in QB rating.
"Let Your Light Shine!"
14 years ago

MPF, currently, Favre leads the league in QB rating.

"Trippster" wrote:



Trippster, that's why I said at the halfway point of the year. We're through Week 11 now. And I realize FAARP leads the league in QB rating right now.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Hindsight. If they had taken Rodgers would Smith have slipped that far? Who knows who we would have taken instead, maybe even someone that could have led us to the Super Bowl with Favre. I'm not saying I'm not thankful, I'm very thankful we have Rodgers, I'm just saying hindsight is 20/20. Nobody knows for sure if Rodgers would have been as good as he is now if he went to the 49ers.

"nerdmann" wrote:




Rodgers would be that good if he was brought along by Mike McCarthy. Mike McCarthy is a QB guru. One of the best in the league.
Meanwhile, Alex Smith has had what? 5 different offensive coordinators in 5 years? No QB could be good through all that.

"djcubez" wrote:



This is what I was thinking. If Smith would've fallen that far, and would've sat behind Favre for 3 years, maybe he would've been developped into a good QB, as well. Maybe Rodgers would've been the draft bust.

I mean, they didn't have any talent at all when they took Smith with the 1st pick. That can screw a QB up good. Look at Joey Harrington, for instance.

And I don't think that Smith would've fallen that far. The Titans just would've had to snatch him. Smith was the better prospect.

Would've been interesting to see who we ended up with. Jason Campbell? Roddy White? Luis Castillo?
Cal2GreenBay
14 years ago
Mike McCarthy the "quarterback guru" had Alex Smith for one year..
and Alex threw more interceptions than touchdowns...

I don't know if that's more on McCarthy or on Smith...
blank
Cal2GreenBay
14 years ago
Let's keep this in perspective.
Even though Aaron sat behind Favre...Aaron was familiar with the west coast offense because Jeff Tedford from CAL runs a version of it.

Alex Smith ran a gimmicky spread offense in college from Urban Meyer.

Everyone talks about how Tedford's QB's don't do well in the NFL(Aaron's busted that notion by the way). No one talks about that NONE of Urban Meyer's QB's have made the adjustment to the NFL either.

Smith only scored on the pack because the packers were in prevent defense the second half and that's how why his spread offense worked. Smith did terrible the first half when the real packer defense was shown.

Even his coach Mike Singletary says that Smith struggles against the real defenses and only has numbers when they are behind and the defenses soften up.

Alex has never mastered dropping back and viewing the field. That would NOT have changed if he had switched spots w/Aaron. McCarthy had him and he couldn't do anything w/Alex. If McCarthy had Aaron in his first year..you would've seen a difference.
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I don't believe the Packers were in a prevent defense. Kampman and Harris were out, and we stopped pressuring as much. And the biggest factor in why the 49ers were able to score is because Woodson wasn't covering Vernon Davis that much, it was Jarret Bush.

Alex Smith doesn't look like he has a strong arm. I wasn't paying much attention to him though.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (14h) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (17h) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (19h) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (21h) : Flag?
Martha Careful (21h) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (22h) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (25-Apr) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Apr / Random Babble / beast

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.