earthquake
a month ago

IMO
LT: Morgan's to lose, if not then Walker, Tom
LG: Banks, Rhyan , Belton
OC: Jenkins, , Monk, Rhyan
RG: Rhyan, Morgan, Belton
RT: Tom, Morgan, Bulaga

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



I didn't notice Bulaga (well done), but I did notice that you're the only person who listed Monk, the only natural center the Packers have on the roster that they drafted, as the backup center. Which I appreciate.

Morgan as the front runner at LT tho, I dunno about that.
blank
a month ago

I didn't notice Bulaga (well done), but I did notice that you're the only person who listed Monk, the only natural center the Packers have on the roster that they drafted, as the backup center. Which I appreciate.

Morgan as the front runner at LT tho, I dunno about that.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Go Packers!!!!
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
a month ago

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


I'm not saying your comment is true, BUT if it were true, then it's a bad pick as LT Walker is CLEARLY the front runner at LT going into camp.

Morgan could potentially beat him out... but he's certainly not the front runner going into the thing...
UserPostedImage
earthquake
a month ago

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



That's a reasonable position. I think it's too early to judge, given that it's his second year and he spent much of the first year injured, we might not know who he is yet. He might be a really good guard too, which would be fine (imo) for a late 1st. But I don't think they have a role carved in stone for him yet. I think he's probably in the mix for a starting guard spot in '25 and competing at tackle in '26. I wouldn't complain if he looks good enough to snatch the LT spot this year, though.
blank
Zero2Cool
a month ago

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


I think he has to be a front runner for one of the starting five, it doesn't need to be LT. Why do you say if he's not front runner for LT in his 2nd year in the league, then it's a bad pick?

UserPostedImage
a month ago

Why do you say if he's not front runner for LT in his 2nd year in the league, then it's a bad pick?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Because with all due respect to other positions, left tackle, for right-handed quarterback, is the most important offensive line position... and it's not even close.

Having a strong left tackle affords the offensive coordinator to scheme differently than when you constantly have to chip and help out your left tackle in pass coverage.

I have never been a fan of the ”best 5” mind set for determining the starters on the offensive line. I believe that in team construction, you pinned down your left tackle 1st, and after that comes everything else. Many guards cannot play tackle, although most tackles can play guard. IIRC Jenkins who is and excellent guard and hopefully will be an excellent center was pedestrian at his time at left tackle. Not so long ago we all thought Billy Turner (I'm thinking of the guy we got from Denver, sorry if I got the name wrong) was supposed to be Mr. flexible and could play any position.
The fact of the matter is he was mediocre at all of them but barely adequate at tackle.

Generally, Super Bowl contending team have strong (even relative to their other linemen) left tackles.

From the draft tape I saw, Morgan has terrific feet which is the key attribute for a left tackle. Yes, his arms are 1/4 of an inch too short for the tape measure guys... but so were David Bakhtiari’s arms, and he was a terrific tackle, as he had spectacular feet.

I don't know whether or not this answers your question, but I think you can draft starting guards in the second and third round, but not so tackles. So given that I think he has great feet and was a first round draft choice I will be disappointed if he doesn't start at left tackle and perform very well.


Go Packers!!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
a month ago

Because with all due respect to other positions, left tackle, for right-handed quarterback, is the most important offensive line position... and it's not even close.

Having a strong left tackle affords the offensive coordinator to scheme differently than when you constantly have to chip and help out your left tackle in pass coverage.

I have never been a fan of the ”best 5” mind set for determining the starters on the offensive line. I believe that in team construction, you pinned down your left tackle 1st, and after that comes everything else. Many guards cannot play tackle, although most tackles can play guard. IIRC Jenkins who is and excellent guard and hopefully will be an excellent center was pedestrian at his time at left tackle. Not so long ago we all thought Billy Turner (I'm thinking of the guy we got from Denver, sorry if I got the name wrong) was supposed to be Mr. flexible and could play any position.
The fact of the matter is he was mediocre at all of them but barely adequate at tackle.

Generally, Super Bowl contending team have strong (even relative to their other linemen) left tackles.

From the draft tape I saw, Morgan has terrific feet which is the key attribute for a left tackle. Yes, his arms are 1/4 of an inch too short for the tape measure guys... but so were David Bakhtiari’s arms, and he was a terrific tackle, as he had spectacular feet.

I don't know whether or not this answers your question, but I think you can draft starting guards in the second and third round, but not so tackles. So given that I think he has great feet and was a first round draft choice I will be disappointed if he doesn't start at left tackle and perform very well.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



Martha, I respect your opinion but I do have one comment to make.
In the olden day the best pass rusher lined up on the defensive left side. Not any more. A lot of teams can put up a very strong rush on their left side.
To me it is more critical to have the OT on the right side be your best lineman. If the QB is rolling right and you don't have a good RG and RT, the QB is rolling right into trouble. If the pass rush is coming from the left the QB has a little more time to look down field and decide if he can pass or if he has to take off and run.

UserPostedImage
a month ago

Martha, I respect your opinion but I do have one comment to make.
In the olden day the best pass rusher lined up on the defensive left side. Not any more. A lot of teams can put up a very strong rush on their left side.
To me it is more critical to have the OT on the right side be your best lineman. If the QB is rolling right and you don't have a good RG and RT, the QB is rolling right into trouble. If the pass rush is coming from the left the QB has a little more time to look down field and decide if he can pass or if he has to take off and run.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Thank you WPR.

Your points are well taken as
- Pressure in the quarterback's face AND
- Keeping the edge
are of paramount performance as it pertains to pressure on passing plays (I hope you appreciate the alliteration!!)

(Side note, One of the frustrating things about Rashad Gary last year was that when he did generate pressure it was at the expense of losing the edge)

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a QB can SEE that pressure coming and can do something about it.

He generally cannot see it from a blind side. Over the years, I have seen QB's with pedestrian pass protection (I can't help myself) on the blind side develop happy feet.

I am too lazy to do the work to prove my point, but I will bet you a shiny new dime that the average left tackle makes more than any position

Moreover, you make excellent points.

Go Packers!!!!
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
a month ago

I am too lazy to do the work to prove my point, but I will bet you a shiny new dime that the average left tackle makes more than any position

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


Technically, based on what you actually said ... you technically owe someone a shiney new dime as on average QBs make more 😜

Yeah yeah yeah, you probably meant of the OL positions.... but that's not what you said 😉

And yeah, looking at the top 5 of the positions... only two RTs are inside the top 5 LT pay, and none of the interior OL, though the top OG got close the 5th LT.

Though the highest paid OT Tristan Wirfs, started 3 years at RT to start his career before moving over to LT.

Looks like WR and Edge Rushers also get paid better than LTs.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
a month ago

Thank you WPR.

Your points are well taken as
- Pressure in the quarterback's face AND
- Keeping the edge
are of paramount performance as it pertains to pressure on passing plays (I hope you appreciate the alliteration!!)

(Side note, One of the frustrating things about Rashad Gary last year was that when he did generate pressure it was at the expense of losing the edge)

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a QB can SEE that pressure coming and can do something about it.

He generally cannot see it from a blind side. Over the years, I have seen QB's with pedestrian pass protection (I can't help myself) on the blind side develop happy feet.

I am too lazy to do the work to prove my point, but I will bet you a shiny new dime that the average left tackle makes more than any position

Moreover, you make excellent points.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



Normally a LT does make more than RT. But it is changing. Just like a team's best rusher might line up on the right side.
But for the most part you are correct.


UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (4h) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (4h) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (5h) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (5h) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (10h) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (10h) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (10h) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (22h) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
beast (30-Jul) : RIP site 😭
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site will die, I have to restart it.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Quinn stinks. Lot of underthrows. (my guess)
beast (30-Jul) : How did Quinn Ewers effect where Golden was drafted?
dfosterf (30-Jul) : All I've experienced was late at night or early morning. I just figured you were doing something in the background
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site sure seems to be down more than up
dfosterf (29-Jul) : 50 cent hookers? I'm moving to Green Bay. I thought it was just real estate that was more affordable there. 😂
Zero2Cool (29-Jul) : Sure seems site going down more than 50¢ hooker
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : Golden with two TDs in red zone drills today
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : @JacobMorley Shoutout to Quinn Ewers for allowing Matthew Golden to be available when Green Bay picked.
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (27-Jul) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (27-Jul) : *Friday*
dfosterf (27-Jul) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
dfosterf (27-Jul) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
packerfanoutwest (27-Jul) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
beast (27-Jul) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
beast (27-Jul) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
beast (27-Jul) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
beast (27-Jul) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
dfosterf (27-Jul) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
dfosterf (27-Jul) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
dfosterf (27-Jul) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
beast (27-Jul) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.