earthquake
29 days ago

IMO
LT: Morgan's to lose, if not then Walker, Tom
LG: Banks, Rhyan , Belton
OC: Jenkins, , Monk, Rhyan
RG: Rhyan, Morgan, Belton
RT: Tom, Morgan, Bulaga

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



I didn't notice Bulaga (well done), but I did notice that you're the only person who listed Monk, the only natural center the Packers have on the roster that they drafted, as the backup center. Which I appreciate.

Morgan as the front runner at LT tho, I dunno about that.
blank
28 days ago

I didn't notice Bulaga (well done), but I did notice that you're the only person who listed Monk, the only natural center the Packers have on the roster that they drafted, as the backup center. Which I appreciate.

Morgan as the front runner at LT tho, I dunno about that.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Go Packers!!!!
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
28 days ago

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


I'm not saying your comment is true, BUT if it were true, then it's a bad pick as LT Walker is CLEARLY the front runner at LT going into camp.

Morgan could potentially beat him out... but he's certainly not the front runner going into the thing...
UserPostedImage
earthquake
26 days ago

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



That's a reasonable position. I think it's too early to judge, given that it's his second year and he spent much of the first year injured, we might not know who he is yet. He might be a really good guard too, which would be fine (imo) for a late 1st. But I don't think they have a role carved in stone for him yet. I think he's probably in the mix for a starting guard spot in '25 and competing at tackle in '26. I wouldn't complain if he looks good enough to snatch the LT spot this year, though.
blank
Zero2Cool
25 days ago

If a healthy somewhat experienced first round pick Morgan is not the front runner at LT, then it was a bad pick.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


I think he has to be a front runner for one of the starting five, it doesn't need to be LT. Why do you say if he's not front runner for LT in his 2nd year in the league, then it's a bad pick?

UserPostedImage
25 days ago

Why do you say if he's not front runner for LT in his 2nd year in the league, then it's a bad pick?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Because with all due respect to other positions, left tackle, for right-handed quarterback, is the most important offensive line position... and it's not even close.

Having a strong left tackle affords the offensive coordinator to scheme differently than when you constantly have to chip and help out your left tackle in pass coverage.

I have never been a fan of the ”best 5” mind set for determining the starters on the offensive line. I believe that in team construction, you pinned down your left tackle 1st, and after that comes everything else. Many guards cannot play tackle, although most tackles can play guard. IIRC Jenkins who is and excellent guard and hopefully will be an excellent center was pedestrian at his time at left tackle. Not so long ago we all thought Billy Turner (I'm thinking of the guy we got from Denver, sorry if I got the name wrong) was supposed to be Mr. flexible and could play any position.
The fact of the matter is he was mediocre at all of them but barely adequate at tackle.

Generally, Super Bowl contending team have strong (even relative to their other linemen) left tackles.

From the draft tape I saw, Morgan has terrific feet which is the key attribute for a left tackle. Yes, his arms are 1/4 of an inch too short for the tape measure guys... but so were David Bakhtiari’s arms, and he was a terrific tackle, as he had spectacular feet.

I don't know whether or not this answers your question, but I think you can draft starting guards in the second and third round, but not so tackles. So given that I think he has great feet and was a first round draft choice I will be disappointed if he doesn't start at left tackle and perform very well.


Go Packers!!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
25 days ago

Because with all due respect to other positions, left tackle, for right-handed quarterback, is the most important offensive line position... and it's not even close.

Having a strong left tackle affords the offensive coordinator to scheme differently than when you constantly have to chip and help out your left tackle in pass coverage.

I have never been a fan of the ”best 5” mind set for determining the starters on the offensive line. I believe that in team construction, you pinned down your left tackle 1st, and after that comes everything else. Many guards cannot play tackle, although most tackles can play guard. IIRC Jenkins who is and excellent guard and hopefully will be an excellent center was pedestrian at his time at left tackle. Not so long ago we all thought Billy Turner (I'm thinking of the guy we got from Denver, sorry if I got the name wrong) was supposed to be Mr. flexible and could play any position.
The fact of the matter is he was mediocre at all of them but barely adequate at tackle.

Generally, Super Bowl contending team have strong (even relative to their other linemen) left tackles.

From the draft tape I saw, Morgan has terrific feet which is the key attribute for a left tackle. Yes, his arms are 1/4 of an inch too short for the tape measure guys... but so were David Bakhtiari’s arms, and he was a terrific tackle, as he had spectacular feet.

I don't know whether or not this answers your question, but I think you can draft starting guards in the second and third round, but not so tackles. So given that I think he has great feet and was a first round draft choice I will be disappointed if he doesn't start at left tackle and perform very well.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



Martha, I respect your opinion but I do have one comment to make.
In the olden day the best pass rusher lined up on the defensive left side. Not any more. A lot of teams can put up a very strong rush on their left side.
To me it is more critical to have the OT on the right side be your best lineman. If the QB is rolling right and you don't have a good RG and RT, the QB is rolling right into trouble. If the pass rush is coming from the left the QB has a little more time to look down field and decide if he can pass or if he has to take off and run.

UserPostedImage
25 days ago

Martha, I respect your opinion but I do have one comment to make.
In the olden day the best pass rusher lined up on the defensive left side. Not any more. A lot of teams can put up a very strong rush on their left side.
To me it is more critical to have the OT on the right side be your best lineman. If the QB is rolling right and you don't have a good RG and RT, the QB is rolling right into trouble. If the pass rush is coming from the left the QB has a little more time to look down field and decide if he can pass or if he has to take off and run.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Thank you WPR.

Your points are well taken as
- Pressure in the quarterback's face AND
- Keeping the edge
are of paramount performance as it pertains to pressure on passing plays (I hope you appreciate the alliteration!!)

(Side note, One of the frustrating things about Rashad Gary last year was that when he did generate pressure it was at the expense of losing the edge)

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a QB can SEE that pressure coming and can do something about it.

He generally cannot see it from a blind side. Over the years, I have seen QB's with pedestrian pass protection (I can't help myself) on the blind side develop happy feet.

I am too lazy to do the work to prove my point, but I will bet you a shiny new dime that the average left tackle makes more than any position

Moreover, you make excellent points.

Go Packers!!!!
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
25 days ago

I am too lazy to do the work to prove my point, but I will bet you a shiny new dime that the average left tackle makes more than any position

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


Technically, based on what you actually said ... you technically owe someone a shiney new dime as on average QBs make more 😜

Yeah yeah yeah, you probably meant of the OL positions.... but that's not what you said 😉

And yeah, looking at the top 5 of the positions... only two RTs are inside the top 5 LT pay, and none of the interior OL, though the top OG got close the 5th LT.

Though the highest paid OT Tristan Wirfs, started 3 years at RT to start his career before moving over to LT.

Looks like WR and Edge Rushers also get paid better than LTs.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
25 days ago

Thank you WPR.

Your points are well taken as
- Pressure in the quarterback's face AND
- Keeping the edge
are of paramount performance as it pertains to pressure on passing plays (I hope you appreciate the alliteration!!)

(Side note, One of the frustrating things about Rashad Gary last year was that when he did generate pressure it was at the expense of losing the edge)

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a QB can SEE that pressure coming and can do something about it.

He generally cannot see it from a blind side. Over the years, I have seen QB's with pedestrian pass protection (I can't help myself) on the blind side develop happy feet.

I am too lazy to do the work to prove my point, but I will bet you a shiny new dime that the average left tackle makes more than any position

Moreover, you make excellent points.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



Normally a LT does make more than RT. But it is changing. Just like a team's best rusher might line up on the right side.
But for the most part you are correct.


UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.