Pack93z
14 years ago
Well, I think they will be looking at the Bills offensive firepower.. which honestly is more ground based and making some determinations based upon that.

Meaning heavier on the defensive box type layers on defense to keep them fresh and more than likely the same type of sets on offense, however I would expect us to try and grind it out later in the game and establish some things upon the ground.. which may mean Quinn gets a gameday nod to punish them late with Kuhn pounding the rock.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I still take a double take at that sig, thing is great man, just great.


I have nothing to add to this thread.
UserPostedImage
beast
14 years ago

[quote="beast"]Last week the inactives were FB Johnson, OT Lang, OG McDonald, OT Newhouse, DE Neal, TE Quarless, CB Underwood, DE Wilson...

Neal and Underwood will be active IF they're healthy. Replacing them on the inactive roster would be DE Wynn CB Lee IF they're healthy.

I see OG McDonald and OT Newhouse being inactive all year unless injuries on the OL become horrible. TE Quarless will probably be inactive most of the year as well unless a TE injury.

I also think with the vet starting OTs looking rusty and Tausher limpping badly at one point that they shoul make Lang active and with short of RBs Kuhn might focus on RB this week and there for maybe make Johnson active.


If I got to choose the inactives this week it would be

OG McDonald, OT Newhouse, TE Quarless, DE Wilson, DE Wynn, CB Lee, RB Nance and CB Underwood.

I think Underwood's injury will need more time to heal and I think the Packers DBs can handle the Bills WRs with out Lee and Underwood. And no way Nance knows the playbook yet or enough to have too many options with him.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



why would nance be inactive we only got 1 RB then?Ik kuhn has shown good things at RB but cmon we need at least 2 active RBs..
also I would like to see what quarless has but I guess crabtree shown more.

Edit:I guess your right about the playbook thing but who know's he could learn it fast lol.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



I agree I want Nance out there and give him some reps BUT the Bills have been studying the Packers film longer than Nance has been on the team.

If he learns the playbook well enough they could sit a LB instead of him... but the LBers also play STs...

If it was just TE I don't think Crabtree would be active... the reason Crabtree is active and made the roster is mainly STs... he's route running is pretty bad... he's mainly just a blocker at TE. BUT Kuhn was just a blocker as well and they're slowly brought him along as a RB and he's getting better and better. They're doing the same thing with Crabtree, ST and blocking until he gets better at running route.

At TE I think Quarless is better than Crabtree. But Quarless doesn't excel on ST like Crabtree does.


Edit: Alright I've changed my mind.... sit Bishop (hamstring) and play Nance as a 3rd guy.... also not practicing is Neal and Woodson. If Neal can't go then Wynn plays (Wynn has played on STs in the past, Wilson hasn't), and I'm gonna guess Woodson can go but if he can't then Lee goes.


Alright I might just be cocky on this one... but I feel like the Packers should be able to beat the Bills even with out Woodson... :buzzsaw:
UserPostedImage
British
14 years ago
We have to activate at least one of Wilson and Wynn, maybe both. Neal is still suffering and the Bills only threat is their run game. We need some big bodies on the DL to clog up the run lanes, there will be much less nickel D than against the Eagles.
UserPostedImage
beast
14 years ago

We have to activate at least one of Wilson and Wynn, maybe both. Neal is still suffering and the Bills only threat is their run game. We need some big bodies on the DL to clog up the run lanes, there will be much less nickel D than against the Eagles.

"British" wrote:



If Neal can't/doesn't go then Wynn does as he has time on ST in the past with the Packers. Wilson hasn't with the Packers.

The Bills OL is pretty bad from what I've heard/seen. If so forget clogging tell the DL to get in the back field and mess up those plays before they get to the line. (but watch out for screens).
UserPostedImage
Finley88Beast
14 years ago

[quote="beast"]Last week the inactives were FB Johnson, OT Lang, OG McDonald, OT Newhouse, DE Neal, TE Quarless, CB Underwood, DE Wilson...

Neal and Underwood will be active IF they're healthy. Replacing them on the inactive roster would be DE Wynn CB Lee IF they're healthy.

I see OG McDonald and OT Newhouse being inactive all year unless injuries on the OL become horrible. TE Quarless will probably be inactive most of the year as well unless a TE injury.

I also think with the vet starting OTs looking rusty and Tausher limpping badly at one point that they shoul make Lang active and with short of RBs Kuhn might focus on RB this week and there for maybe make Johnson active.


If I got to choose the inactives this week it would be

OG McDonald, OT Newhouse, TE Quarless, DE Wilson, DE Wynn, CB Lee, RB Nance and CB Underwood.

I think Underwood's injury will need more time to heal and I think the Packers DBs can handle the Bills WRs with out Lee and Underwood. And no way Nance knows the playbook yet or enough to have too many options with him.

"beast" wrote:



why would nance be inactive we only got 1 RB then?Ik kuhn has shown good things at RB but cmon we need at least 2 active RBs..
also I would like to see what quarless has but I guess crabtree shown more.

Edit:I guess your right about the playbook thing but who know's he could learn it fast lol.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



I agree I want Nance out there and give him some reps BUT the Bills have been studying the Packers film longer than Nance has been on the team.

If he learns the playbook well enough they could sit a LB instead of him... but the LBers also play STs...

If it was just TE I don't think Crabtree would be active... the reason Crabtree is active and made the roster is mainly STs... he's route running is pretty bad... he's mainly just a blocker at TE. BUT Kuhn was just a blocker as well and they're slowly brought him along as a RB and he's getting better and better. They're doing the same thing with Crabtree, ST and blocking until he gets better at running route.

At TE I think Quarless is better than Crabtree. But Quarless doesn't excel on ST like Crabtree does.


Edit: Alright I've changed my mind.... sit Bishop (hamstring) and play Nance as a 3rd guy.... also not practicing is Neal and Woodson. If Neal can't go then Wynn plays (Wynn has played on STs in the past, Wilson hasn't), and I'm gonna guess Woodson can go but if he can't then Lee goes.


Alright I might just be cocky on this one... but I feel like the Packers should be able to beat the Bills even with out Woodson... :buzzsaw:

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



Woodson is playing.. I have no doubt in that there just being smart with him.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (33m) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (50m) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (1h) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (1h) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (1h) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Damn that sucks
Zero2Cool (2h) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
beast (5h) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
beast (5h) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Golden
beast (19h) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (20h) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (21h) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (21h) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (22h) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (22h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (22h) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
buckeyepackfan (22h) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
buckeyepackfan (22h) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
buckeyepackfan (23h) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
buckeyepackfan (23h) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
buckeyepackfan (23h) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
buckeyepackfan (23h) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (24-Apr) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (24-Apr) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (24-Apr) : I should have put it in quotes
dfosterf (24-Apr) : It is the title of a you tube video.
dfosterf (24-Apr) : I'm not assuming anything
beast (24-Apr) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (23-Apr) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (23-Apr) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (23-Apr) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (23-Apr) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.