nyrpack
  • nyrpack
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
nfl live espn is reporting ryan grant is out for this weekend vs. buffalo, i think brandon jackson is capable of getting more carries and aaron rodgers is going to make up for a lackluster 1st game a torch buffalo in the air !!

there saying its a ankle injury and is week to week
jimmy b.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Any more news on Grant other than he's out against Buffalo?

By the way, glad I was wrong about Jackson. I said the drop off would be significant if Grant got hurt. Jackson looked good back there.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
nyrpack
  • nyrpack
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

Any more news on Grant other than he's out against Buffalo?

By the way, glad I was wrong about Jackson. I said the drop off would be significant if Grant got hurt. Jackson looked good back there.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



they only said ankle injury , out this week , packers havent commented as far as i know !!
jimmy b.
Pack93z
14 years ago
I mentioned this in another thread.. I think Ted has a shopping list going.

1. DL depth with the regrettable injury to Harrell.

2. Another back.. with us going thin at back by inserting Kuhn in as the #3.. I think it might be time to rethink that.

Sorry.. but I don't see a track record of durability with Jackson and I am not sure if he had to that Kuhn could tote the rock for 15 to 20 carries.

Ideally a back that is a change of pace back.. think scat with some receiving skills.. I know they don't grow on trees, but we could use one now.. even if he is green.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

I mentioned this in another thread.. I think Ted has a shopping list going.

1. DL depth with the regrettable injury to Harrell.

2. Another back.. with us going thin at back by inserting Kuhn in as the #3.. I think it might be time to rethink that.

Sorry.. but I don't see a track record of durability with Jackson and I am not sure if he had to that Kuhn could tote the rock for 15 to 20 carries.

Ideally a back that is a change of pace back.. think scat with some receiving skills.. I know they don't grow on trees, but we could use one now.. even if he is green.

"pack93z" wrote:

Picking up a guy like Marcus Mason would be a good move in my opinion.
This is a placeholder
nyrpack
  • nyrpack
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
i have said all along getting rid of lumpkin was a mistake for this very reason !!
jimmy b.
musccy
14 years ago


Sorry.. but I don't see a track record of durability with Jackson and I am not sure if he had to that Kuhn could tote the rock for 15 to 20 carries.

"pack93z" wrote:



agreed. Kuhn is a servicable emergency fill-in, but like you say, if given 15-20 carries, how much can the team expect him to produce? Keeping Harrell and only 2 rbs on the roster were big big risks, and it's almost comical how quickly the packers are facing the consequences of the risks taken.

As for Grant, fortunately it's only an ankle sprain instead of anything with the knee. Rub some dirt on an ankle sprain and you're good to go.
Finley88Beast
14 years ago
I think they may bring that guy from the practice squad onto the team that
RB James Johnson.As good as kuhn looks i would still go and get another RB.
Lol but by all means the depth chart could look like this for gameday
RB:
1.Brandon Jackson
2.John Kuhn
3.Korey Hall

FB:
1.Korey Hall
2.Quinn Johnson
3.John Kuhn

Highly doubt it thoe
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I bet we don't sign anyone and tough it out, hoping that Starks makes it back. ๐Ÿ˜ž
UserPostedImage
Finley88Beast
14 years ago
Since Harrell is going on IR that frees up a roster spot more than likley were getting a RB or a Dlineman
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (9h) : Merry Christmas ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ
beast (18h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (22h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright ยฉ 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comโ„ข. All Rights Reserved.