I said he did not have one fumble last season running the ball. His fumble can on a reception against the Bengals. Maybe you should stop being so sensative. I wasnt trying to insult them, I just find it funny how they think a rookie would do better than Grant.
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
Surprisingly enough, I know what you said, I can read. That's right, I'm a double threat, stunningly handsome and smart. Watch out!
I'm not being sensative, or sensitive, see I can be technical just like you.
I don't think many really believe a rookie would be better than Ryan Grant. At least no rookie on our team now, lol.
It's been the same thing on these boards for the last two seasons. Last year it was Tyrell Sutton who ran a slow 4.5 and this year it appears to be Quinn Porter. It's also been sexy to pick Kregg Lumpkin to take over as well. Does that mean the fan base is not intelligent? No, it means they're hoping for more production from the RB position that Grant provides.
We've been proven that we're gonna pass and gonna be unstoppable passing, therefore the running back position just needs to get 4 yards when needed and not turn the ball over. That means, no fumbles on running OR receiving, in case anyone wants to be ... technical.
Regarding the fumble against the Bengals, who really sits back an says "yeah we were tied at 21 all near their 40 yard line when Grant fumbled, but hey it was not a running fumble, it was a receiving fumble so we should cut him some slack."
Fact is, Grant fumbled and the Packers didn't recover it.
"Brandon494" wrote: