The biggest difference between NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and his peers arises from the fact that, in our view, Goodell hasn't forgotten what it's like to be a fan of the sport he runs. And so he thinks and communicates like a fan, especially when talking to other fans.

After he finished calling out draft picks on Friday night from the stage at Radio City Music Hall, he held court for an extended period of time with a throng of fans near the ESPN broadcast platform. On Saturday, Goodell talked to a group of fans at the draft who won a chance for a sit-down with the Commish, and he spoke about the issue of rookie pay in a manner that surely will resonate with everyone who hears his words.

Except the rookies and their agents.

"I love [Rams quarterback] Sam Bradford, and I hope he's great, but he probably made somewhere between $40 and $45 million the night before last," Goodell said. "He has not even hit the field yet and that's a guaranteed contract. So if Sam Bradford can't play, what good does that do any other NFL player? As much as I like these young rookies, and I do think they're terrific, it's crazy to give someone who hasn't proven themselves on the NFL field $45 million.

"I think over these three days, we will give $600 million in guaranteed money to these rookies that you're hearing their names. $600 million. And if let's just say half of them don't make it and the money is equivalent to this, that's $300 million out the door. It doesn't go to veterans, it doesn't go to owners. It goes to somebody who couldn't play the game. That's wasting money."

He's right. Now that the draft is over, we can focus on the fact that history tells us roughly half of the players picked will indeed be busts. And so roughly half of them won't live up to the huge contracts those taken at the top of the process will receive.

It's an issue on which the NFL and the union appear to now agree, and a deal likely would be reached on this point if/when a consensus can be established as to the broader issue of pay and benefits for all players. Still, there's a strong sense in league circles that 2010 will be the last year of the "free money" -- and any rookies who don't like what they're offered in the coming months and who contemplate sitting out the year and re-entering the draft should keep that in mind.

IMO, as I have stated before, is truly one of the driving issues of the opt out from ownership.. this issue alone had killed many franchises bottom line annually.

"pack93z" wrote:

NFL owners complaining about rookies' salaries humors me. "We need a rookie wage scale! Rabble rabble!"

This would be like me going to a strip club, tipping the dancers $50 a pop, and then complaining to the management that there needs to be a tipping limit because I always spend too much money.

"IronMan" wrote:

NFL owners complaining about rookies' salaries humors me. "We need a rookie wage scale! Rabble rabble!"

This would be like me going to a strip club, tipping the dancers $50 a pop, and then complaining to the management that there needs to be a tipping limit because I always spend too much money.

"IronMan" wrote:

"IronMan" wrote:

I don't go into a job interview fresh out of college demanding to be paid the average salary of the top-10 highest paid people in my profession.

"djcubez" wrote:

"djcubez" wrote:

Problem is this, though.

If one owner refuses to pay that amount, his team will never become good and there's a pretty decent chance he won't win more than 2 games a season. That kills off a fanbase really fast.

"Rockmolder" wrote: