Zero2Cool
14 years ago
link 


The biggest difference between NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and his peers arises from the fact that, in our view, Goodell hasn't forgotten what it's like to be a fan of the sport he runs. And so he thinks and communicates like a fan, especially when talking to other fans.

After he finished calling out draft picks on Friday night from the stage at Radio City Music Hall, he held court for an extended period of time with a throng of fans near the ESPN broadcast platform. On Saturday, Goodell talked to a group of fans at the draft who won a chance for a sit-down with the Commish, and he spoke about the issue of rookie pay in a manner that surely will resonate with everyone who hears his words.

Except the rookies and their agents.

"I love [Rams quarterback] Sam Bradford, and I hope he's great, but he probably made somewhere between $40 and $45 million the night before last," Goodell said. "He has not even hit the field yet and that's a guaranteed contract. So if Sam Bradford can't play, what good does that do any other NFL player? As much as I like these young rookies, and I do think they're terrific, it's crazy to give someone who hasn't proven themselves on the NFL field $45 million.

"I think over these three days, we will give $600 million in guaranteed money to these rookies that you're hearing their names. $600 million. And if let's just say half of them don't make it and the money is equivalent to this, that's $300 million out the door. It doesn't go to veterans, it doesn't go to owners. It goes to somebody who couldn't play the game. That's wasting money."

He's right. Now that the draft is over, we can focus on the fact that history tells us roughly half of the players picked will indeed be busts. And so roughly half of them won't live up to the huge contracts those taken at the top of the process will receive.

It's an issue on which the NFL and the union appear to now agree, and a deal likely would be reached on this point if/when a consensus can be established as to the broader issue of pay and benefits for all players. Still, there's a strong sense in league circles that 2010 will be the last year of the "free money" -- and any rookies who don't like what they're offered in the coming months and who contemplate sitting out the year and re-entering the draft should keep that in mind.



I can't imagine a new CBA without a rookie wage format of some kind.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
IMO, as I have stated before, is truly one of the driving issues of the opt out from ownership.. this issue alone had killed many franchises bottom line annually.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Formo
14 years ago

IMO, as I have stated before, is truly one of the driving issues of the opt out from ownership.. this issue alone had killed many franchises bottom line annually.

"pack93z" wrote:



Yeah.. it's redonkulous. Those kids have to go out and earn it.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
IronMan
14 years ago
NFL owners complaining about rookies' salaries humors me. "We need a rookie wage scale! Rabble rabble!"

This would be like me going to a strip club, tipping the dancers $50 a pop, and then complaining to the management that there needs to be a tipping limit because I always spend too much money.
Formo
14 years ago

NFL owners complaining about rookies' salaries humors me. "We need a rookie wage scale! Rabble rabble!"

This would be like me going to a strip club, tipping the dancers $50 a pop, and then complaining to the management that there needs to be a tipping limit because I always spend too much money.

"IronMan" wrote:



It's not about owners complaining.. They complain no matter who gets the big contract. Besides, there's a cap limit anyway, and most owners get pretty damn close to it. Cutting the rookie salaries allow more cap room, which allow more money to the guys/FAs that deserve it.

It's about unproven 'talent' joining an organization and automatically being one of the highest paid 'talent' in the organization.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
djcubez
14 years ago

NFL owners complaining about rookies' salaries humors me. "We need a rookie wage scale! Rabble rabble!"

This would be like me going to a strip club, tipping the dancers $50 a pop, and then complaining to the management that there needs to be a tipping limit because I always spend too much money.

"IronMan" wrote:



You forgot two key parts in your analogy.
1. The dancer is young, inexperienced and above all else, unproven.
2. You wouldn't be tipping an average amount. It'd be well above average possibly in the hundreds to thousands of dollars category.

I don't go into a job interview fresh out of college demanding to be paid the average salary of the top-10 highest paid people in my profession.
IronMan
14 years ago

NFL owners complaining about rookies' salaries humors me. "We need a rookie wage scale! Rabble rabble!"

This would be like me going to a strip club, tipping the dancers $50 a pop, and then complaining to the management that there needs to be a tipping limit because I always spend too much money.

"djcubez" wrote:



You forgot two key parts in your analogy.

"IronMan" wrote:



No, my analogy is perfect.

I don't go into a job interview fresh out of college demanding to be paid the average salary of the top-10 highest paid people in my profession.

"djcubez" wrote:


You would if employers (like NFL owners) were dumb enough to pay you that much.
Rockmolder
14 years ago

NFL owners complaining about rookies' salaries humors me. "We need a rookie wage scale! Rabble rabble!"

This would be like me going to a strip club, tipping the dancers $50 a pop, and then complaining to the management that there needs to be a tipping limit because I always spend too much money.

"IronMan" wrote:



You forgot two key parts in your analogy.

"djcubez" wrote:



No, my analogy is perfect.

I don't go into a job interview fresh out of college demanding to be paid the average salary of the top-10 highest paid people in my profession.

"IronMan" wrote:


You would if employers (like NFL owners) were dumb enough to pay you that much.

"djcubez" wrote:



Problem is this, though.

If one owner refuses to pay that amount, his team will never become good and there's a pretty decent chance he won't win more than 2 games a season. That kills off a fanbase really fast.

If all the owners work together and no one signs a FA anymore, there will be strikes. And I'm sure that one or two owners (Uch.. Jones... Uch... Snyder) will screw it over and sign everyone they want, anyway. That's why this has to be put in a CBA.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
If owners collectively agreed not to pay the rookies more than a specified amount, that would be collusion and would void the NFL's anti-trust exemption. Such a plan must be negotiated with the players in the collective bargaining agreement to maintain the anti-trust exemption.
UserPostedImage
IronMan
14 years ago



Problem is this, though.

If one owner refuses to pay that amount, his team will never become good and there's a pretty decent chance he won't win more than 2 games a season. That kills off a fanbase really fast.

"Rockmolder" wrote:


Draftees do not have free agent rights. Don't want to sign the offer we give you? Tough shit. Sit at home for a year and try again in the next draft.

You really think players will do that? No, they will take what is offered.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (3h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (3h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (3h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (13h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (18h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (21h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.