Rockmolder
14 years ago
Belgium moves to become first European country to ban the burka 

By Mail Foreign Service

Belgium is on the verge of becoming the first European nation to ban the burka.

A parliamentary committee agreed yesterday to outlaw the wearing of face-covering veils in public. The full Parliament will vote later this month.

Under the proposals, women could face a week in prison or a fine for wearing a veil in public.

There are an estimated 650,000 Muslims in Belgium 6 per cent of the population.

The text of the new law does not specifically mention burkas but makes it illegal for anyone to wear clothing that covers all or most of the face in any public place.

Left-wing MP Denis Ducarme left no doubt the rules were targeting-Muslim extremists.

He said after the vote by the home affairs committee: This sends a very strong signal to radical Islamists.

The French- speaking liberals who have proposed the law argue that an inability to identify people presents a security risk and that the veil is a walking prison for women.

Daniel Bacquelaine, the bills chief promoter, said the ban might also be used against potentially violent demonstrators who covered their faces.

He estimated that only a few hundred women in Belgium wore facial veils, but said it was a rising trend.

The MP said Belgium did not wish to follow the bad examples of Britain and the Netherlands, where he said many Muslims lived in separate communities.

The proposal is expected to become law as early as June as it has the support of all five parties in the coalition government. But opponents may appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

There have been debates over banning the burka in France, Switzerland and Italy.

This week Frances highest administrative body said a full burka ban, which is supported by all political parties, could violate the French constitution and European law.

Brussels has been linked to Islamic extremist terror operations a number of times since September 11. In 2003, 18 men were convicted of involvement in a terror cell with links to Al Qaeda.

Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
And this is all done in the name of protecting the rights and dignity of women. But no one ever asks the women themselves what they want.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago
I had to look up what the crap a burka was.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
It's burqa. The spelling "burka" annoys me, because it doesn't accurately represent the true pronunciation of the word.

But then, a lot of American media outlets still persist in spelling bin Laden's name "Osama."

Also, burqa is only really worn in Afghanistan, so I wonder if what they're really trying to ban is niqab. It's possible that there are a lot of Afghani immigrants in Belgium, I suppose.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Aren't the Belgians the ones that are still mad about them being called "French" fries?

Or was that Tuesday*?

(*obscure "literary" reference that probably only Foster will get.)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Cheesey
14 years ago
Who cares HOW it is spelled??? Or "Osama" for that matter.
BOTH should be done away with.
Thats only my humble opinion though.
I don't care if someone spells something wrong, as long as they got their point/idea across.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
Why not allow them to wear what ever they freaking want?

If it offends you.. don't freaking look.

Have someone pass a law in the states outlawing baseball caps (BTW... that would turn many into Marine like pissed off clones.. lol).. it seems just as silly to me.

Cultural clothing shouldn't be outlawed.. IMO.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
On what basis should they be banned from wearing the burqa if they want to, Alan? Did you know there's a big movement among American Muslim women right now to voluntarily take up wearing hijaab? It's not run by the men -- it's the women leading the way. Who are we to tell them not to do this? (Especially since the Bible also says women should be covered!) Is religious freedom something only to be accorded Christians and when it's convenient for us?
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago

On what basis should they be banned from wearing the burqa if they want to, Alan? Did you know there's a big movement among American Muslim women right now to voluntarily take up wearing hijaab? It's not run by the men -- it's the women leading the way. Who are we to tell them not to do this? (Especially since the Bible also says women should be covered!) Is religious freedom something only to be accorded Christians and when it's convenient for us?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



lol no but when regular peeps cant wear stuff because its deemed not acceptable but people can dress head to toe in black with only their eye sockets showing because thats their religion ie thats the problem. Least I think thats it.

alot of anti PC here in the UK imo ... I was looking for a room to rent in a community with the majority of middle eastern population and I was descriminated against ie was either hung up on or told they dont rent to white people <<< was quite lame.
Every middle eastern place I called and asked about their room for rent I got the above.

back to the burka subject thou - I feel sorry for the women that have to wear that whole garb - hot as bleep out there and they are dressed like ninjas with many layers ...
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Who cares HOW it is spelled???

"Cheesey" wrote:



Because "burkha" probably has a very different meaning from "burqa," since they're pronounced differently and the phonemes of Arabic are extremely sensitive (i.e., English speakers often can't tell the difference between different sounds).

By the way, why has no one addressed my point that many of these women voluntarily choose this garb? Stop feeling sorry for them. The burqa isn't a sign of "female repression" or any other Western-feminist bullshit term. It's something they choose to wear as an expression of female pride. If women felt so oppressed over there, they would have revolted long ago, just as women did in the West.

For those of you who think the burqa is functionally equivalent to a steel collar and chain, consider the fact that before we invaded Iraq, women walked around the streets of Baghdad unaccompanied in blue jeans and t-shirts. Now anywhere they go they have to be on the arm of a man and fully covered from head to toe. Guess we didn't do the women of Iraq any favors, eh?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (19m) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (20m) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (30m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (42m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (51m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (1h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (2h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (2h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (4h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (5h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (5h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (5h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (5h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (5h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (5h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (5h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (5h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (5h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (6h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (6h) : Packers will get in
beast (6h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (6h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (6h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (9h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (19h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.