PC the Boot?· Page 3 · PACKERSHOME

Wade
Veteran Member

14 years ago

I used to post a lot on PC. I didn't have any major problems with them -- learned that certain subjects never got anywhere and ignored them. Still visit occasionally, but I really only have time for one packers forum (if that), and I like this place better.

I think there are a lot of good people posting over there, it's just that the distribution has a fatter "lower tail".

For me, it also helps that no topics (religion, politics, economics) are verboten over here. You guys tolerate all my odd idiosyncrasies.

...and of course its nice to have a minnesota gnome to watch being kicked around from time to time. 🙂

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#22

"Wade" wrote:

Yes, we do have some quirky people here, but I think it's a good thing. A good mix of personalities. And nothing being :xcensoredx: is a big plus too.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Rockmolder
Honored Member

14 years ago

#23

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Yes, we do have some quirky people here, but I think it's a good thing. A good mix of personalities. And nothing being :xcensoredx: is a big plus too.

"Wade" wrote:

If anything, we have too many intelligent people. It's amazing at times to see the topics in the general discussion. We pretty much have experts on everything. At times, I just keep out of discussions just because of that.

And that's not really a bad thing, of course. It's even educational at times. Lol.

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#24

I used to post a lot on PC. I didn't have any major problems with them -- learned that certain subjects never got anywhere and ignored them. Still visit occasionally, but I really only have time for one packers forum (if that), and I like this place better.

I think there are a lot of good people posting over there, it's just that the distribution has a fatter "lower tail".

For me, it also helps that no topics (religion, politics, economics) are verboten over here. You guys tolerate all my odd idiosyncrasies.

...and of course its nice to have a minnesota gnome to watch being kicked around from time to time. :)

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Yes, we do have some quirky people here, but I think it's a good thing. A good mix of personalities. And nothing being :xcensoredx: is a big plus too.

"Wade" wrote:

Well there was a time this past year when Zero did not want any more said on the "former GB QB" issue. Which, for the record, I did not have a problem with.

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#25

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Yes, we do have some quirky people here, but I think it's a good thing. A good mix of personalities. And nothing being :xcensoredx: is a big plus too.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

"Wade" wrote:

And then there is Cheesey. :ramboface:

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#26

Rock - why sell yourself short? You're too modest (but that's a common trait with your people). I enjoy your insights.

WPR - I think Zero did the right thing too as everyone was saying the same thing over and over. It got to the point where you knew what everyone was going to say before they said it. We all had our stances, and they were set in stone and nobody was going to budge.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#27

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Agreed. I was just being a smart A :pottytrain2: :pottytrain1:
Whether it was needed or not it was still a form of :xcensoredx: even though it was much needed and appreciated.

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#28

True. But it was more censorship because it got old and annoying than censorship because it was a sensitive issue.

Kind of along the lines as if I had a mute button to a girlfriend I had back in '93 (God I wish she came with a mute button).

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#29

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Sorry about that, but I couldn't take it anymore. And it was also to protect myself from my own passion towards Brett, blah blah. I try not to censor if at all possible. We all survived though, well, except one member.

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#30

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"zombieslayer" wrote:

I knew you would join in this conversation. I am really proud of how long you were able to sit on the sidelines. That was real self restraint my friend.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (6h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (10h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (12h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (22h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (22h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (22h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (22h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (22h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS