zombieslayer
12 years ago
I'm all for Free Speech too. Unless it involves making fun of someone. Or it's offensive to someone's religion. Or you're discussing something that could possibly hurt someone. Or if you're criticizing the President of the United States. Anyone who criticizes the President of the United States should go to jail. No exceptions.

Other than that, I'm all for Free Speech.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
yooperfan
12 years ago

I'm all for Free Speech too. Unless it involves making fun of someone. Or it's offensive to someone's religion. Or you're discussing something that could possibly hurt someone. Or if you're criticizing the President of the United States. Anyone who criticizes the President of the United States should go to jail. No exceptions.

Other than that, I'm all for Free Speech.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Wow, you should be president of the NRA.

Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

I'm all for Free Speech too. Unless it involves making fun of someone. Or it's offensive to someone's religion. Or you're discussing something that could possibly hurt someone. Or if you're criticizing the President of the United States. Anyone who criticizes the President of the United States should go to jail. No exceptions.

Other than that, I'm all for Free Speech.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Oh, well said. You had me going for a bit, long enough to see whether I misread the user name. Took me just the right amount of time to figure out your intended tone. ("plus one" if we were still doing it the other way!)


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Like I've said, I'm an amateur historian. Yes, innocent people will die every year with "scary" guns. I won't deny that. But as a historian, when things crashed, innocent people get scapegoated. Then they get murdered by mobs and/or the government.

THERE ARE TOO MANY EXAMPLES OF THIS IN THE 20TH CENTURY ALONE. And no, I will not apologize for screaming because frankly, I'm pissed off.

I'm the wrong skin color and the wrong race. I want guns that hold 30+ bullets, because when the mob shows up at my door, I want to shoot every single last one of those mother fuckers.

And lastly for the record, most of those mass murders (I'm not talking about the 10+, I'm talking about the 100,000+), the people thought "can't happen here." There were a few where the people saw it coming but couldn't do a thing about it. And gun control is what got them killed. Everyone knows this, but some of us are in denial about it.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DakotaT
12 years ago

Like I've said, I'm an amateur historian. Yes, innocent people will die every year with "scary" guns. I won't deny that. But as a historian, when things crashed, innocent people get scapegoated. Then they get murdered by mobs and/or the government.

THERE ARE TOO MANY EXAMPLES OF THIS IN THE 20TH CENTURY ALONE. And no, I will not apologize for screaming because frankly, I'm pissed off.

I'm the wrong skin color and the wrong race. I want guns that hold 30+ bullets, because when the mob shows up at my door, I want to shoot every single last one of those mother fuckers.

And lastly for the record, most of those mass murders (I'm not talking about the 10+, I'm talking about the 100,000+), the people thought "can't happen here." There were a few where the people saw it coming but couldn't do a thing about it. And gun control is what got them killed. Everyone knows this, but some of us are in denial about it.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Yes but you are talking about gun abolishment, not gun control. The pro gun view wants to scare people into saying they are going to confiscate all guns and that simply is not the case. There are people in this country other than convicted felons that should not be allowed to own a weapon and it has to do with their mental capacity not that Dumbass Formo thinks I'm a Fascist.

I'll give you that a governmnet can ramrod a society that doesn't have weapons, but do any of you really think our government would be able to disarm this country? No fuckin way could that happen, but we can make laws so that certain people can't own guns. Enforcing those laws is where the problem lies today and thirty years from now.

The other side of this argument is which guns/magazines should be legal. Argue away, but my opinion is that no common swinging dick out there should be allowed a weapon that could fire thirty rounds in less than 15 seconds. It's just not necessary.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Yes but you are talking about gun abolishment, not gun control. The pro gun view wants to scare people into saying they are going to confiscate all guns and that simply is not the case. There are people in this country other than convicted felons that should not be allowed to own a weapon and it has to do with their mental capacity not that Dumbass Formo thinks I'm a Fascist.

I'll give you that a governmnet can ramrod a society that doesn't have weapons, but do any of you really think our government would be able to disarm this country? No fuckin way could that happen, but we can make laws so that certain people can't own guns. Enforcing those laws is where the problem lies today and thirty years from now.

The other side of this argument is which guns/magazines should be legal. Argue away, but my opinion is that no common swinging dick out there should be allowed a weapon that could fire thirty rounds in less than 15 seconds. It's just not necessary.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



With all due respect, amigo, you're still seeing the small picture.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Formo
12 years ago
Zombie, what do you think as the amateur historian?

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Cheesey
12 years ago

Because we can't even afford our teachers according to the Republicans who want to gut education - but sticking yahoos at the front door solves our problems? It's proposterous - and the NRA look like a bunch of jackasses for bringing it up.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Do away with sports or a music program, and you could afford protection for the children.
I know....."The poor kids won't have sports or band???"
What's more important? Playing a clarinet, making a free throw, or making sure there is someone there that can keep a madman from murdering defenseless children and teachers?
Republicans do NOT want to "gut" education. What they DO want is accountability to said "educators" for the money spent. Kids that graduate high school yet can't read and write (and i know one personally that did) and scores that don't match up with lessor countries that have much less money to spend on education.
THAT is what they are asking for.

What answer do YOU have to protect the kids in school? I haven't heard you come up with even ONE so far. Other then to poo poo the only serious answer that has been put out there.

The guns are there. You can outlaw all you want. Bad guys will still get them, and commit horrible crimes. As has been said (and proven) gun laws ONLY affect LAW ABIDING CITIZENS. They stop NO criminals or violent crime.
Why is that so hard to accept for you? The proof is there that what i just said is 100% true. Yet you just keep spewing the same anti gun stuff, and offer no REAL thing that will stop the bad guys from killing.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
12 years ago

Do away with sports or a music program, and you could afford protection for the children.
I know....."The poor kids won't have sports or band???"
What's more important? Playing a clarinet, making a free throw, or making sure there is someone there that can keep a madman from murdering defenseless children and teachers?
Republicans do NOT want to "gut" education. What they DO want is accountability to said "educators" for the money spent. Kids that graduate high school yet can't read and write (and i know one personally that did) and scores that don't match up with lessor countries that have much less money to spend on education.
THAT is what they are asking for.

What answer do YOU have to protect the kids in school? I haven't heard you come up with even ONE so far. Other then to poo poo the only serious answer that has been put out there.

The guns are there. You can outlaw all you want. Bad guys will still get them, and commit horrible crimes. As has been said (and proven) gun laws ONLY affect LAW ABIDING CITIZENS. They stop NO criminals or violent crime.
Why is that so hard to accept for you? The proof is there that what i just said is 100% true. Yet you just keep spewing the same anti gun stuff, and offer no REAL thing that will stop the bad guys from killing.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Who's to say the gun enthusiest hired to watch the front door doesn't get taken out before the rampage. I went and picked up my kids at school last week and told the principle and a couple teachers standing out in the lobby what the NRA's big idea was - they rolled their eyes and snickered at the stupidity of putting an armed guard at their front door. And if you think small town America is going to give up their football team, Cheesey, you're out of your mind. I don't have the answers, but I know a bad idea when I hear one - and armed guards in the schools where I live is a bad idea. If the big city people want to do that, then by all means, go right ahead - but figure out how to pay for it on your own.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Zombie, what do you think as the amateur historian?

UserPostedImage

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Well, had to have a strategy of having thousands of people severely beaten, including beaten to death instead of simply overthrowing them by force.

The British deserved to be overthrown by force. If you look at their history, they're one of the most evil nations that ever existed. They've fucked over a quarter of the planet.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
dfosterf (14h) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17h / Around The NFL / isaiah

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / GoPack1984

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / beast

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.