buckeyepackfan
14 years ago
Packers | Jolly scheduled for hearing Thursday
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:19:36 -0800

The Green Bay Press-Gazette reports Green Bay Packers DL Johnny Jolly is scheduled for a pretrial hearing Thursday, Feb. 18, on a felony drug charge. Jolly was the driver of a vehicle in which police found cops of a codeine mixture while in the parking lot of a Houston nightclub in July 2008. The charge of possession of at least 200 grams of codeine in the form of cough syrup was dropped in July but re-filed Dec. 15.




Packers | Likely will take a QB in later rounds
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:09:56 -0800

Jason Wilde, of ESPNMilwaukee.com, reports the Green Bay Packers likely will take a quarterback in the later rounds of the 2010 NFL Draft as a developmental project.




Packers | Green believes he will return in 2010
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:55:01 -0800

Mike Larsen, of the Kenosha News, reports Green Bay Packers RB Ahman Green said he believes he will be back with the team next season. "It sounds like I'll be back next season. I'm just getting myself in shape and getting ready for 2010," Green said. Green added he does not mind what his role with the team will be should he return. "I'm a football player so (the role) doesn't really matter," Green said. "I know the way the game goes. I know my role go in there full tilt. Even if it's just as a third-down guy and special teamer, I've played that before too, so I know how to approach it and be just as professional as a starter."




Packers | Unlikely to use either tag
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:48:09 -0800

Greg A. Bedard, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers likely will not use their franchise or transition tag this offseson. Impending free-agent DT Ryan Pickett would be the most likely candidate if the team were to use their franchise tag.




Packers | Pickett wants to return
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:19:33 -0800

Rob Reischel, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports Green Bay Packers pending unrestricted free-agent DL Ryan Pickett would like to remain with the team next season. Pickett appears to be one of the team's top offseason priorities. "Hopefully we can get something done because I love it here," Pickett said. "My wife, the kids, the schools, we love it. My oldest is five, and she's in kindergarten. We've got a good feeling for the whole area. Moving's a big-time pain and right now everybody's comfortable. Hopefully, I can stay."




Packers | R. Grant wants to be more involved in passing game
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:47:06 -0800

Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports Green Bay Packers RB Ryan Grant said he would like to be more involved in the team's passing game next season.




Packers | Struggled on kick and punt coverage
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:32 -0800

Rob Reischel, writing for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers ranked 31st in opponent's average starting point because the team's kick coverage struggled. The Packers also ranked 31st in punt return coverage.




Packers | Kapinos might not have leg strength for NFL
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:17:11 -0800

Rob Reischel, writing for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports Green Bay Packers P Jeremy Kapinos finished 16th in gross average with 43.8 yards per punt, but he finished tied for 32nd in net average with 34.1 yards per punt. His hang times were below average, and he might not have the leg strength to punt in the NFL.




Packers | Crosby triggers salary escalator for 2010
Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:20:20 -0800

Pete Dougherty, of the Green Bay Press-Gazette, reports Green Bay Packers PK Mason Crosby was scheduled to make $550,000 in 2010, but he reached incentives that boosted his salary to $1.01 million.




Packers | R. Grant reached contract escalator for next season
Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:19:44 -0800

Pete Dougherty, of the Green Bay Press-Gazette, reports Green Bay Packers RB Ryan Grant earned a substantial contract escalator for 2010. Grant earned an escalator of $1.5 million by topping the 1,250-yard rushing mark, raising his pay to $6 million when his salary is combined with roster and workout bonuses.




Packers | Woodson reached contract escalator for next season
Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:19:24 -0800

Pete Dougherty, of the Green Bay Press-Gazette, reports Green Bay Packers CB Charles Woodson earned a substantial contract escalator for 2010. Woodson earned an escalator of $1.5 million, raising his 2010 base salary to $6.5 million. He is due a $900,000 roster bonus and a $100,000 workout bonus, meaning Woodson is scheduled to earn $7.5 million next season.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Crosby's incentive clauses must not have been terribly arduous.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Packers | R. Grant wants to be more involved in passing game
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:47:06 -0800

Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports Green Bay Packers RB Ryan Grant said he would like to be more involved in the team's passing game next season.

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



I'd like to see him stop dropping the ball on 5 yard stick routes.

Packers | Kapinos might not have leg strength for NFL
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:17:11 -0800

Rob Reischel, writing for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports Green Bay Packers P Jeremy Kapinos finished 16th in gross average with 43.8 yards per punt, but he finished tied for 32nd in net average with 34.1 yards per punt. His hang times were below average, and he might not have the leg strength to punt in the NFL.

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



This was painfully obvious. We where happy with him after we had an even worse punter in Frost, but Kapinos was nothing more than a quick solution for 1 season. I really hope that we go after a punter in this draft. Haven't done any research on any, so I don't have a favorite, but it can't be that much worse than what we have now.
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

Packers | Struggled on kick and punt coverage
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:32 -0800

Rob Reischel, writing for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers ranked 31st in opponent's average starting point because the team's kick coverage struggled. The Packers also ranked 31st in punt return coverage.



Wow, I'd say a 3 year old could tell you that...that is probably the stupidest input someone could put in on that.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
As my 3-year-old said excitedly to me when he saw Peyton Manning throwing a touchdown in the Super Bowl: "Daddy, he scored! The guy in blue scor-r-r-red!"

Friggin' kid's never seen a hockey game and he's a fan already.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (6m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (26m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (35m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (46m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.