British
15 years ago
There's a bit of talk about the Pack trading up in the 1st round.

Although it would be nice to go up and grab a stud LT I don't see it happening this year. Each team only gets (around) 7 picks a year. If you trade up too often you end up feeling it down the road when you don't have the young players coming through.

It's the same with trades. You don't trade away your top round picks every year otherwise you end up with nothing coming up through the ranks in years to come.

The CM3 trade was great but it meant we didn't have any 2nd or 3 round picks last year. Players taken there in recent seasons have developed into solid starters.

To trade up from #23 to the top 10 where the elite LTs are would take a similar bounty of picks.

Considering this year is a strong overall draft its a great year to pick up solid talent in those top three or four rounds where Ted Thompson has traditionally done well.

They are also good value for money picks compared to the top 10. With a rookie salary cap to come, this is not a year to trade up and saddle the club with another overblown rookie salary.

If we were one LT away from the SB then it may be different. But this team could use a 2nd round Safety, a 3rd round CB and a 4th round OLBer. It may cost two of those three to pick in the top 10.
UserPostedImage
GermanGilbert
15 years ago
Trading up isn't always a bad thing. The Jets spent almost their whole picks for 2 players in last years draft (Sanchez and Greene) and they are playing in the ccg on Sunday.

They also spent their 1st, 2nd and 5th in 2007 to trade from #25 to #14 and got an about 10 years all-inclusive vacation on Revis Island for that. Heck, I would love to see the Packers making such a big move. He's a standout and I wouldn't mind this price at all.

Trading up can be a big thing, you just have to find the right players to trade up for.
blank
bozz_2006
15 years ago
that's easy enough, right?
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
I could see a trade up, but it would not be a huge jump into the top 10. Maybe a few spots only. The thing with the number of picks and getting youth is, that we have the youth. Where the team is, saving late picks does one thing. Replaces young guys with young guys. I think there is only something like 12 guys that are what I would consider old on the team. that isn't much.

Now would be the perfect time to trade up, just like last year, only I would not expect a move that far. Maybe a few positions. What I would expect more is a small move back and a move forward both. Dropping back a bit to end up with 3 2nds or something along that line.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago
Ted would have to really love a player for him to move up once again.
UserPostedImage
porky88
15 years ago

Ted would have to really love a player for him to move up once again.

"wpr" wrote:



Exactly, and that's why you can't rule it out. Ted Thompson, clearly loved Clay Matthews and gave up a lot to get him. Probably more than he needed to, but he wanted to get that pick to get Matthews. If he likes, say, Bryan Bulaga for example, he may move up to get him if he feels he's projected to go higher.
dyeah_gb
15 years ago
I feel this next year is when we adjust a strategy to try to make our super bowl push. I think that means we trade up if an opportunity shows up and we take some action in free agency. Expect to hear comments in the offseason like "This is uncharacteristic of Ted"

The only wild card to this is if the rules dramatically change for he uncapped season.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Brandon494
15 years ago

Ted would have to really love a player for him to move up once again.

"porky88" wrote:



Exactly, and that's why you can't rule it out. Ted Thompson, clearly loved Clay Matthews and gave up a lot to get him. Probably more than he needed to, but he wanted to get that pick to get Matthews. If he likes, say, Bryan Bulaga for example, he may move up to get him if he feels he's projected to go higher.

"wpr" wrote:



At the time I thought he gave up too much but now it looks like a steal.

To have a rookie voted to the pro bowl is something special.
blank
millertime
15 years ago
Its all about value. Quality LT are hard to find. If it takes a couple extra picks, so be it. We have a franchise QB. If we don't keep him healthy, NOTHING ELSE MATTERS! If Rodgers goes down, our chances are over. If you think giving up an extra 2nd or 3rd rounder is risky, what do you call letting Clifton face Jared Allen and Co. twice next season? That seems way riskier to me...


We've seen plenty of our late second and third round picks become busts: Rouse, Hodge, Brohm, etc...
digsthepack
15 years ago
This is one of the depest and most talented drafts in some time...if you believe the words of some pundits. We can get the players we want, without giving picks away. The ONLY way Ted Thompson should trade up if someone extremely talented drops (like Rodgers) and just cannot be denied.
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
Fan Shout
dfosterf (2h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (2h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (2h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (9h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (10h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (11h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (11h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (13h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.