millertime
15 years ago
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20091129/PKR07/91129056/1058/PKR01/Dougherty--3-wins-needed-for-playoffs 

Green Bay Packers need 3 wins to make NFC playoffs

by: Pete Dougherty

So what will it take to get into the 2009 playoffs in the NFC?

Sign up for Green Bay Packers text alerts

Nine wins? Probably not.

Ten? Much more likely.

Either way, the Green Bay Packers are in good position to get into postseason play, based on their schedule and recent performance.

If the season ended today, the Packers and the Philadelphia Eagles would be the NFCs two wild-card teams at 7-4.

But with five games to play, the New York Giants (6-5) and Atlanta Falcons (6-5) are in the thick of the race, and the San Francisco 49ers (5-6) remain just on the fringe.

Theres also a chance the Eagles could catch Dallas (8-3) for first place in the NFC East Division, in which case Dallas would replace Philadelphia in the running for one of the two wild-card spots. Regardless, one of the two will win the division, and the other has a great shot at a wild card.

The Packers have played better in winning their last three games, including getting their lone win of the season over a team thats currently at least .500, Dallas.

Just as important, they have a favorable schedule, maybe the most favorable among the main contenders for those two wild-card spots.

As determined by opponents records alone, the Packers have the easiest schedule (26-27 not counting Sunday nights game between Pittsburgh and Baltimore), followed by Atlanta (27-27), with the Eagles and Giants tied (32-23) for the toughest.

A subjective look suggests the same.
The NFC contenders' schedules

The Packers play two teams below .500 (Chicago and Seattle, both 4-7) that are effectively out of the playoff race, one likely division winner (Arizona, 7-4 in the NFC West) and two teams in the playoff hunt in the AFC, Baltimore (5-5) and Pittsburgh (6-4), who played Sunday night, before this column went to print

Atlanta has three games remaining against teams below .500, including two (Buffalo and Tampa Bay) that are out of the playoff hunt. But the Falcons also play an elite team (New Orleans) and one of the other NFC wild-card contenders, the Eagles.

The Giants play two teams under .500 (Washington at 3-8 and Carolina at 4-7), but also face Dallas, Philadelphia and Minnesota (10-1).

The Eagles have it the toughest, with only one opponent under .500 (San Francisco), plus games against Atlanta, the Giants, Denver (7-4) and Dallas.

Of course, the difficulty of the schedule can change between now and any particular game, depending on circumstance, most notably injuries, but also depending on whats at stake. An opponent could fall out of the playoff race and letdown, or be in a must-win game and play with greater urgency, or have a playoff seeding wrapped up and thus rest its starters.
Chasing those last three wins

To get to 10 wins, the Packers need to win three of their final five games. Heres a quick look at each of those match ups, in order, and the possible circumstances:

Baltimore (5-5 going into Sunday night): The Ravens are a bit of a mystery this season after advancing to the AFC championship game last year. They have talent, and three of their losses are to likely playoff teams (Cincinnati, Minnesota and Indianapolis) by a total of seven points combined.

They could provide a better indication of just how much the Packers have shored up their problems protecting quarterback Aaron Rodgers, which seems to be the progression over the last three weeks. Though Baltimore went into the weekend tied for only 20th in sacks, they have an elite outside rusher in Terrell Suggs if he plays he was doubtful for Sunday night because of a knee injury and run an aggressive 3-4 defense.

The Ravens will have plenty at stake regardless of what happened against Pittsburgh on Sunday night. A win and theyre tied with the Steelers for the final wild-card spot in the AFC at 6-5, with four 5-6 teams also at their heels. A loss and they might have to win out to make the playoffs, so the Packers game would be do or die.

Chicago (4-7): The Bears are finished for 2009 after losing to Minnesota on Sunday. Quarterback Jay Cutler has thrown 20 interceptions, the second-most in the league this year; their offensive line is a disaster (halfback Matt Forte is averaging 3.3 yards a carry); and the defense (No. 20 in the league in points allowed) is a shell of the group that carried the team earlier in coach Lovie Smiths tenure.

Keep in mind a few things, though. Smith always has placed great emphasis on defeating the Packers hes 7-4 against them. The Packers are 1-2 at Chicago in Mike McCarthys three previous seasons as coach. Cutler is a talented player more than capable of playing lights out in any given game.

Pittsburgh (6-4 going into Sunday night): The defending Super Bowl champs arent playing like last season, but this game at Pittsburgh is the toughest one remaining on the Packers schedule. The Steelers will be in the middle of the playoff race and looking to peak down the stretch for another possible title run.

They also should have safety Troy Polamalu back by then, and his playmaking is critical to their defense. Hes essentially missed six games because of knee injuries one of his knee injuries was on the games first possession not including Sunday night, which he also was scheduled to miss. The Steelers were 2-4 in those games.

Seattle (4-7): The Seahawks arent good, but if quarterback Matt Hasselbeck is on the field, they have a chance. In games hes been healthy enough to start and finish theyre 4-4.

Arizona (7-4): This regular-season finale is a wild card, because the Cardinals might have nothing to play for.

They have a two-game lead over San Francisco for first place in the NFC West Division, and if they win their head-to-head matchup in two weeks, they easily could have the division title wrapped up by the time they host the Packers.

But Arizona probably wont have a shot at catching Minnesota (10-1) or New Orleans (10-0) for either of the top two seeds in the NFC, which carry a first-round bye in the playoffs. If thats the case, coach Ken Whisenhunt might not care whether he gets the third or fourth seed, and could rest some key players for the first round of the playoffs the following week.

However, if the Cardinals have anything at stake, they have one of the NFLs more potent offenses with quarterback Kurt Warner and receivers Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin.

Dulak
15 years ago
Cool article - looking forward to see how the packers do vs these opponents. And hopefully seeing them in the playoffs.

btw here is a big FU to all those chicago peeps I have seen around london (that tried to make fun of the packers).
"you guys suck and so does your team"
Porforis
15 years ago
Nice article, but how about we just win every game and not have to worry about anybody but ourselves? 🙂
British
15 years ago

Nice article, but how about we just win every game and not have to worry about anybody but ourselves? :)

"Porforis" wrote:



Obviously that's what the team is planning on doing.

But us fans enjoy speculating on all our rivals.
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
15 years ago
This article sums up alot on my mind lately. I don't know whether the Raven's win last night helped or hurt us. We need to show up for this Monday's game.

If we win, than we really don't have to worry as much about the Steelers or Arizona game since we just need to beat the Bears and Seahawks. Regarding the Cardinals: I think the era of teams sitting their starters before the playoffs has passed. No one likes to lose just before starting in the playoffs.

Also, I was really pleased to see a much better executed short game against the Lions because we are going to need it down the stretch to keep Rodgers healthy and confident.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
warhawk
15 years ago

This article sums up alot on my mind lately. I don't know whether the Raven's win last night helped or hurt us. We need to show up for this Monday's game.

If we win, than we really don't have to worry as much about the Steelers or Arizona game since we just need to beat the Bears and Seahawks. Regarding the Cardinals: I think the era of teams sitting their starters before the playoffs has passed. No one likes to lose just before starting in the playoffs.

Also, I was really pleased to see a much better executed short game against the Lions because we are going to need it down the stretch to keep Rodgers healthy and confident.

"dyeah_gb" wrote:



I think in the case of Arizona it may play out a little differently this time. Not being able to crack the top two means they will play the first week of the playoffs. I agree the top two might not want to risk sitting guys for two weeks but that's not the case with the Cards.

Secondly, with Warner it's a fragile situation because of his history with head injuries. I cannot see them risking a possible concussion here going into the playoffs.

Lastly, IF we have to have this game and Arizona really does not I expect the effort of our starters would be greater than theirs and that we will come out of there with a W regardless of how long they play their guys.

At the end of the day if we have to have this game to get in and they really don't have anything to play for and we lose I don't guess we belong in the playoffs anyhow.
"The train is leaving the station."
15 years ago
Yesterday was looking so good for us for a while... I thought the Eagles and Falcons were going to be upset. Damn comebacks...
UserPostedImage
gbpfan
15 years ago
watching the game last night,think we can do this if grant can run like he has been.I think they can finish on top well okay special teams in my eyes are more of a concern.
dfosterf
15 years ago
I have a bad feeling about the Ravens. I could not decide if it would be better if the Ravens win or lose prior to the game. I have decided now. It would have been better if they lost. :thumbleft:

It is true that it was hard to determine what kind of team the Ravens were. They seemed to be "lost", or "under-performing" or however you want to put it.

That game last night was a small war. I thought both teams were flying around. They both looked scary as prospective opponents, at least to me.

I think that last night's OT win will breathe new life into the Ravens. This I do not like. We are catching them at a bad time, imo.

In the interest of fairness, I'd have probably come up with an alternative scary scenario had the Ravens lost, so don't pay all that much attention to this, lol.

I wish we had beat Tampa.

We either play the best football of the season (by far) next Monday, or we are going to get our asses completely kicked. That's what I sense.
warhawk
15 years ago

I have a bad feeling about the Ravens. I could not decide if it would be better if the Ravens win or lose prior to the game. I have decided now. It would have been better if they lost. :thumbleft:

It is true that it was hard to determine what kind of team the Ravens were. They seemed to be "lost", or "under-performing" or however you want to put it.

That game last night was a small war. I thought both teams were flying around. They both looked scary as prospective opponents, at least to me.

I think that last night's OT win will breathe new life into the Ravens. This I do not like. We are catching them at a bad time, imo.

In the interest of fairness, I'd have probably come up with an alternative scary scenario had the Ravens lost, so don't pay all that much attention to this, lol.

I wish we had beat Tampa.

We either play the best football of the season (by far) next Monday, or we are going to get our asses completely kicked. That's what I sense.

"dfosterf" wrote:



I can only say that we are far better off than the Ravens in terms of when we play them. They are coming off two against the Colts and Steelers and now travel to us with 11 days rest. That's not quite a bye week for us but it's close.

Last night was a war because of Pittsburgh's QB situation. Baltimore has been burned by the big play and the Steelers big play guy didn't play. I have said this often in these threads but I expect to beat these teams by making them pay defensively for their aggressiveness and making enough big plays to win. Allowing long drives and double digit play drives is not what Baltimore is about.

We have the firepower Pittsburgh could not present last night. Losing Ben played right into the Ravens hand and I certainly don't fear their offense which has only averaged 17 points a game the last five.

I expect to win the game. A hard hitting tough game but a win.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
beast (7h) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter
beast (7h) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.