Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

Tom Oates: Rodgers clearly among NFLs elite quarterbacks 

By TOM OATES / Wisconsin State Journal | Posted: Saturday, November 28, 2009 11:45 pm

[img_r]http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/lacrossetribune.com/content/tncms/assets/editorial/6/48/433/648433e0-dca5-11de-90e8-001cc4c03286.preview-300.jpg?_dc=1259471382[/img_r]After the Green Bay Packers were done making the Detroit Lions look like turkeys on Thanksgiving Day, Louis Delmas, Detroit's rookie safety, told reporters that Aaron Rodgers was the toughest quarterback the Lions had faced since they saw Indianapolis superstar Peyton Manning during the exhibition season.

Considering that the Lions have faced New Orleans' Drew Brees, Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger and, yes, even Minnesota's Brett Favre since then, that was quite a compliment.

There was only one problem with it: Though clearly flattered, Rodgers wasn't buying it.

"It's high praise and I appreciate that," Rodgers said. "But before I start getting mentioned with Peyton, we've got to start winning some playoff games around here."

That's not false humility. Rodgers knows that NFL quarterbacks are judged on many things but that No. 1 on the list is winning.

Rodgers hasn't passed the winning test yet - his regular-season record since replacing Favre as the Packers' starter is 13-14 - but since his out-of-the-blue, three-interception performance in the Packers' upset loss at Tampa Bay, he's been acing many of the other tests an NFL quarterback faces during his formative years.

In a victory over Dallas, he finally won a big game against a good team. In a victory over San Francisco, he dissected a good, well-coached defense with the precision of a surgeon. And Thursday at Detroit - Green Bay's third win in 12 days - Rodgers' consistent playmaking lifted his team to victory over an upset-minded team despite a balky running game and an early deficit.

"He's playing well," offensive coordinator Joe Philbin said. "He's managing the offense well, he's making good decisions, he's showing good awareness on the field. It looks like he's playing fast but not rushed, if that makes any sense. He looks like he feels pretty comfortable out there."

That should be comforting to Packers fans. In those three games, two of which were televised nationally, Rodgers has demonstrated conclusively that he has everything he needs to be a winning quarterback in Green Bay for the next decade or so.

"He's the leader of our offense right now, and that's what you have to do," wide receiver Donald Driver said. "You have to step up, and he's stepped up for the last three weeks on a big stage in front of millions and millions of people and made the plays that he needs to make."

There are reasons for Rodgers' improvement that are beyond his control.

The return of Mark Tauscher and the emergence of rookie T.J. Lang has solidified the line and stopped the constant flow of sacks and quarterback hits that were getting inside Rodgers' head. The return of tight end Jermichael Finley and wide receiver Jordy Nelson from injury gave Rodgers as many high-end targets as any quarterback in the league. Finally, coach Mike McCarthy returned the offense to its West Coast roots with a steady diet of short, quick passes starting with the Dallas game.

In his last three games, Rodgers has completed 70.8 percent of his passes for 871 yards, six touchdowns and no interceptions.

"I feel like I'm playing pretty well, but I still feel like there's things I can do better," he said. "I'm very critical of myself. Even in a game like (Detroit) where the stats probably look pretty good, I still left yards on the field. I made a couple poor throws, a couple poor reads. I'm still looking to have a very content feeling after the game. Being a perfectionist, it's not going to come that often."

Rodgers credits most of his recent success to improvement in the pass protection, which, he said, "allows me to feel very comfortable back there." He also said he getting the ball out quicker than he did earlier in the season.

"(He's) consistent," McCarthy said. "He's doing a very good job of running the offense. He's not taking chances."

Still, Rodgers hit the Lions with multiple long passes, a couple of them on improvisations, which is something he had eschewed while playing a controlled game against Dallas and San Francisco. Knowing when to go for it and when to play it safe could be a sign that he's putting it all together.

Rodgers is strong-armed, accurate, mobile, intelligent and diligent. But we pretty much knew that about him already. Lately, he's shown more of the intangibles that separate the winning quarterbacks from the merely talented quarterbacks.


UserPostedImage
millertime
15 years ago
You need to change your sig. Where is the optimism???
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Changed.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago
Let's be real Delmas. I love Rodgers. Everyone knows that. But Rodgers is not better than Favre or Brees.

I'd still slap the elite label on Rodgers though. Despite having the worst OL in the entire league, he's still managing unreal stats. After week 11, his TD to INT ratio is considerably better than Peyton Manning's, he's the best scrambler in the league, and nobody can deny his stats:
104.9	249	380	65.5	3136	285.1	8.3	22	5

My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
While I might agree with the premise of the article, I don't put much stock in this article. If Rodgers has a single bad game, these sportswriters will be off his bandwagon quicker than a frog off a hot griddle.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago
Screw them. It should be judged by the season. Like I said, put up 22 TDs vs 5 INTs to Peyton Manning's numbers. Let's also not forget that Peyton Manning has an elite OL and Rodgers has the worst in the NFL and still puts up those numbers. And let's also not forget that my Grandma is more mobile than Peyton Manning and Rodgers is the best scrambler in the NFL.

I'm not at all implying Rodgers is better than Manning, but just saying this year, he deserves a lot more cred than he's getting from these idiot writers.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Silentio
15 years ago
Yeah. Rodgers is for real. Through 12 weeks, Rodgers has more yards (3,136) than Tom Brady (3,049) and a better passer rating (104.9) than Peyton Manning (102.5). Imagine if he had even a middling O-line in front of him.
blank
Dulak
15 years ago

Yeah. Rodgers is for real. Through 12 weeks, Rodgers has more yards (3,136) than Tom Brady (3,049) and a better passer rating (104.9) than Peyton Manning (102.5). Imagine if he had even a middling O-line in front of him.

"Silentio" wrote:



We only have to go back to the pre-season to see what he is capable of.
What was it 157 or 159 passer rating with 0 sacks.

I hope harris is back next season so we dont feel like we have to grab a top rated CB in the draft.

Get that OL plugged.
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Yeah. Rodgers is for real. Through 12 weeks, Rodgers has more yards (3,136) than Tom Brady (3,049) and a better passer rating (104.9) than Peyton Manning (102.5). Imagine if he had even a middling O-line in front of him.

"Dulak" wrote:



We only have to go back to the pre-season to see what he is capable of.
What was it 157 or 159 passer rating with 0 sacks.

I hope harris is back next season so we dont feel like we have to grab a top rated CB in the draft.

Get that OL plugged.

"Silentio" wrote:



Even if Harris isn't bad, we don't need to grab a top rated CB. It's just that injuries have been hard on us at the CB position.

Without Harris, the normal string of CBs would be : Woodson - Williams - Blackmon/Lee - Blackmon/Lee - Bush.

That's not an amazing line up and we'd still have quite a drop off from our starters to our nickel back, but it looks quite a bit better than free falling down to Bush, who has the ball awareness of a rubber duck.

As to this thread... I think I made my point quite clear in that other thread. I can't think of one single QB I'd trade him for right now.
Silentio
15 years ago

As to this thread... I think I made my point quite clear in that other thread. I can't think of one single QB I'd trade him for right now.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Agreed. As exciting as it is to have Rodgers right now, I think the most exciting thing about having him on the team is the next 10 years. An established vet (Manning, Brady, Rothlisburger, even Favre) would be great to have, but they don't represent the kind of talent now AND hope for the future that Rodgers does.
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (15h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (15h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
22-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.