Gravedigga
15 years ago

I think what's more amazing is Aaron doesn't have a RB threat like Adrian to take the heat off him.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Not just you, but everyone really needs to get off that kick. Fumbles All Day and Grant have pretty similar statistics and Peterson fumbles left and right, grant doesnt. The "great" vikings running game has been slightly above average and really, just average when you consider the fumbles. Aarons played amazing and i dont take anything away but dont make it seem like Favre has some big advantage due to the running game or the o-line because Favre's getting slammed around back there like a rag doll worse than i've ever seen other than maybe 2005.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Porforis
15 years ago

I think what's more amazing is Aaron doesn't have a RB threat like Adrian to take the heat off him.

"Gravedigga" wrote:



Not just you, but everyone really needs to get off that kick. Fumbles All Day and Grant have pretty similar statistics and Peterson fumbles left and right, grant doesnt. The "great" vikings running game has been slightly above average and really, just average when you consider the fumbles. Aarons played amazing and i dont take anything away but dont make it seem like Favre has some big advantage due to the running game or the o-line because Favre's getting slammed around back there like a rag doll worse than i've ever seen other than maybe 2005.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



You're absolutely right on the AP angle, however I have to disagree with your comment on the O line. The reason why he's getting knocked around is half on the o line, half on the fact that he's not nearly as mobile as he used to be. Instead of being able to slip out of a rushed tackle attempt, roll out to the right, and fire a missile 40 yards downfield on a run, he just goes down.
Gravedigga
15 years ago

It's been said many times this year including by Vikings players themselves that Favre is the biggest offensive threat, not AP.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Are you familiar with the Trojan War by any chance? :)




Statistically it appears Favre and Rodgers are interchangeable. Realistically, I don't think so.

I think Favre with Grant would do far worse than Rodgers would if he had Adrian.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Lol, you be smokin sumptin nice. The packers have a FAR superior receiving corps plus, if Favre were there, he would have had 2 more years with all those weapons that he groomed for Aaron. He took a couple of rookies at receiver and a bunch on the o-line plus a bunch of plug guys and a no name running attack and turned into a superbowl contender. Now that they have matured and learned over the past 3-4 years, they are more able to complement an inferior QB. Dont look too deep into the term. Yes, i said inferior. If anyone cant handle Rodgers at this point being inferior to favre, thats too bad. It's not a dig. I think Rodgers is great but he's not better.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Gravedigga
15 years ago

I think what's more amazing is Aaron doesn't have a RB threat like Adrian to take the heat off him.

"Porforis" wrote:



Not just you, but everyone really needs to get off that kick. Fumbles All Day and Grant have pretty similar statistics and Peterson fumbles left and right, grant doesnt. The "great" vikings running game has been slightly above average and really, just average when you consider the fumbles. Aarons played amazing and i dont take anything away but dont make it seem like Favre has some big advantage due to the running game or the o-line because Favre's getting slammed around back there like a rag doll worse than i've ever seen other than maybe 2005.

"Gravedigga" wrote:



You're absolutely right on the AP angle, however I have to disagree with your comment on the O line. The reason why he's getting knocked around is half on the o line, half on the fact that he's not nearly as mobile as he used to be. Instead of being able to slip out of a rushed tackle attempt, roll out to the right, and fire a missile 40 yards downfield on a run, he just goes down.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Thats true too. I agree. He's good on the move but stuck in a collapsing pocket, you're not seeing him make a play to get out of the pocket and find the open man. He can make one move, pretty much forward and if theres someone in his way, he's going down.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
dfosterf
15 years ago
Did everyone notice how effective the Vikes were Monday night at hitting their RB's underneath?

It seemed almost unstoppable...take the back through the hole after play-action and hit him 4-8 yards downfield.

I wish we would do more of that...

Ahman!
Formo
15 years ago

Cool. I just disagree.

We got better WRs and better TEs. They just have better RBs but not really by that much. The wild card in their RB set is Chester Taylor who I think is superior to Green/Jackson.

Their OL is better but really not by much.

Favre really blew it. We all know how much Favre loves TEs and we got much better TEs than they do. He'd be much better off with us than them. Also his chemistry with Berrian isn't that good. With their system, Berrian = Driver and we all know how good Favre's chemistry was with Driver.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I think the BRETT FAVREs Oline is better, but not consistent. And looking at the stats, I think the WRs even themselves out... Rice & Harvin are pretty on par with Driver & Jennings. You guys have more depth at TE, so I give you that edge. Our RBs, statistically are only a tiny bit better than yours.. But it's pretty obvious that once you factor historically, we have the superior RB corp.

Favre uses his TE.. There's really only one the team as a whole uses (the backups are blocking TEs more than anything else), and that's Shiancoe. When compared to Finley, they are comparable.. But it's silly to imply that Favre doesn't use his TE this year as he would if he had the Packers TEs.. (BTW, Shank has 10 TDs, you guys have a total of 5 for the TE position).

I do agree with you on Berrian and Favre's chemistry. That can be attributed to Berrian's glass legs (he was injured all of pre-season and most of the first half of the season), though. I think Rice would be more comparable to Driver than Berrian, considering the chemistry Rice and Favre have (even after a handful of games to get in tune).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Porforis
15 years ago

Did everyone notice how effective the Vikes were Monday night at hitting their RB's underneath?

It seemed almost unstoppable...

"dfosterf" wrote:



And then he remembers that it was the Bears.
Formo
15 years ago

It's been said many times this year including by Vikings players themselves that Favre is the biggest offensive threat, not AP.

"Gravedigga" wrote:



Are you familiar with the Trojan War by any chance? :)




Statistically it appears Favre and Rodgers are interchangeable. Realistically, I don't think so.

I think Favre with Grant would do far worse than Rodgers would if he had Adrian.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Lol, you be smokin sumptin nice. The packers have a FAR superior receiving corps plus, if Favre were there, he would have had 2 more years with all those weapons that he groomed for Aaron. He took a couple of rookies at receiver and a bunch on the o-line plus a bunch of plug guys and a no name running attack and turned into a superbowl contender. Now that they have matured and learned over the past 3-4 years, they are more able to complement an inferior QB. Dont look too deep into the term. Yes, i said inferior. If anyone cant handle Rodgers at this point being inferior to favre, thats too bad. It's not a dig. I think Rodgers is great but he's not better.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I disagree with your assessment of the WR comparison. Read my post in the previous page to see why.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
longtimefan
15 years ago

I think what's more amazing is Aaron doesn't have a RB threat like Adrian to take the heat off him.

"Gravedigga" wrote:



Not just you, but everyone really needs to get off that kick. Fumbles All Day and Grant have pretty similar statistics and Peterson fumbles left and right, grant doesnt. .

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Yeah opposing defenses are stacking the box to shut down Grant

Try again
Gravedigga
15 years ago

It's been said many times this year including by Vikings players themselves that Favre is the biggest offensive threat, not AP.

"Formo" wrote:



Are you familiar with the Trojan War by any chance? :)




Statistically it appears Favre and Rodgers are interchangeable. Realistically, I don't think so.

I think Favre with Grant would do far worse than Rodgers would if he had Adrian.

"Gravedigga" wrote:



Lol, you be smokin sumptin nice. The packers have a FAR superior receiving corps plus, if Favre were there, he would have had 2 more years with all those weapons that he groomed for Aaron. He took a couple of rookies at receiver and a bunch on the o-line plus a bunch of plug guys and a no name running attack and turned into a superbowl contender. Now that they have matured and learned over the past 3-4 years, they are more able to complement an inferior QB. Dont look too deep into the term. Yes, i said inferior. If anyone cant handle Rodgers at this point being inferior to favre, thats too bad. It's not a dig. I think Rodgers is great but he's not better.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I disagree with your assessment of the WR comparison. Read my post in the previous page to see why.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Rice could start on the packers but nobody else. Not a TE, not another receiver. Vikings receivers are alright. Harvin is good for a rookie but come on. GB has far superior weapons. IMO, i think Jordy Nelson would be awesome opposite Rice and i'm not sure that rice would even be better. Rice just happens to be an available big body with some athleticism that Favre is taking to a new level. He should take half his new contract and give it to Favre.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (2h) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (3h) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (4h) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (4h) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Mucky Tundra (4h) : I would imagine Dallas will resolve this issue with a truckload of money
Zero2Cool (6h) : Micah pulling a Myles with trade request
beast (12h) : Packers should make some cheese forks
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : GRAB THE PITCHFORKS~
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : CUT HIM
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : Socieltal collapse imminent
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : The West has fallen
Mucky Tundra (31-Jul) : After starting off camp with 25 straight made field goals, Brandon McManus has missed one
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : But it should be stable
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : It's probably gonna be slower.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : We're gonna just full go on to the new host.
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : What crap. Site issues galore
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : if PH dies, there is packerpeople com available
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : database is on new host, eventually website will follow
Mucky Tundra (30-Jul) : Zero, regarding Ewers, you are correct.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Sadly, this might be our life for awhile. I could put it on another host, but seems it was slower, although more stable
beast (30-Jul) : How long will it be down?
beast (30-Jul) : RIP site 😭
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site will die, I have to restart it.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Quinn stinks. Lot of underthrows. (my guess)
beast (30-Jul) : How did Quinn Ewers effect where Golden was drafted?
dfosterf (30-Jul) : All I've experienced was late at night or early morning. I just figured you were doing something in the background
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Site sure seems to be down more than up
dfosterf (29-Jul) : 50 cent hookers? I'm moving to Green Bay. I thought it was just real estate that was more affordable there. 😂
Zero2Cool (29-Jul) : Sure seems site going down more than 50¢ hooker
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : Golden with two TDs in red zone drills today
Mucky Tundra (27-Jul) : @JacobMorley Shoutout to Quinn Ewers for allowing Matthew Golden to be available when Green Bay picked.
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (27-Jul) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (27-Jul) : *Friday*
dfosterf (27-Jul) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (27-Jul) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (27-Jul) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
dfosterf (27-Jul) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (27-Jul) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
8h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.