Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Source Link 

The following is the analysis of the Packers' 38-26 loss to the Minnesota Vikings in Brett Favre's return to Lambeau Field.

Q. In considering the differences between the Packers and Vikings, I'm sure there were a number of things that stood out to you, but was there one thing in particular that came through loud and clear from the game Sunday?


A. I think that one team is undisciplined and maybe not as prepared and the other team has a team full of veterans, they're smart, they're well-coached, they understand the magnitude of the game. The game is not too big for them. It just seems like they've been preparing for this for a long time. I don't see them making critical errors. If they do, they can overcome it. I see an offensive line that is a fortress. They have a couple of good players on that line, but they're not all Pro Bowlers. The right tackle is a rookie. So, it just seems like they were prepared to do battle in a hostile environment, but I don't know if it's so hostile anymore. I think the veteran factor separates these two teams, one being an elite team and the other a team trying to find out how good they really are. It shows up in penalties, it shows up in explosive plays, in decision-making. Probably No. 1 in decision-making. The Packers, being one of the youngest teams in the league, I think it's accepted, we're not going to make these great plays as some of these veteran teams. To me, they didn't spend a lot of money on that offensive line. The Vikings did to get Adrian Peterson into the secondary and to protect their quarterback. It seems to me if you had spent that kind of money on Aaron Rodgers, that you do everything you can to protect him. Why even have money under the cap if you're not going to get talent in front of him to block for him? The Packers are playing a future game, a game for the future, but it's right now. Right now, you have to have some veterans with your younger guys. Four or five years from now, the Packers will probably be pretty good. But you're playing teams that are winning right now, like Minnesota, like Philadelphia, like Atlanta, like the Giants. The Packers are playing with future talent and that's why they can't win big games right now.

Q. It's probably unfair to expect Aaron Rodgers to be as good as a future Hall of Famer like Brett Favre, but what is the difference right now in their games? Where are the Vikings benefiting from Favre that the Packers are lacking with Rodgers?

A. Game management. There's a huge difference. Favre can manage a game. I mean look at it, no sacks in two games and seven touchdowns. He can manage the game better than Rodgers right now. Rodgers held the ball a couple of times instead of running for first downs. Brett gets rid of the ball. If he has to run, he will. Just good decisions. And that normally doesn't go with Brett, good decisions, because of all the interceptions. He's thrown the most interceptions in history. But these two games against the Packers he's made great decisions and he manages the game a lot better. I think that's one or two areas. I just don't want Aaron to become a stat guy, leading in all these areas but not having won anything. We have too many of those quarterbacks. You have to win the big game.

Q. After the game, defensive end Cullen Jenkins became the second player on defense to express real frustration with the 3-4 system. He said he felt that players were handcuffed and weren't put in position to do what they're good at. Do you agree with that or was he just frustrated?

A. I agree because you have to find out what your players are good at and let them do that. Otherwise, you're going to have a bunch of robots or system guys. Both corners are bump-and-run guys, they're not used to playing off. It just kind of hinders you when you're playing within the system and the system doesn't fit. I made all-pro with three or different coordinators. It didn't matter what system it was, I made it work. So, on the one hand, you have that, too. As players you have to win the one-on-one matchups. You have to win. It's a team sport, but it's one person in that helmet. Go make a play. As players, I know it's easy for us to blame the system and for coaches it's easy to blame the players. But ultimately it's up to the players. Coaches don't make players, players make coaches, so you have to go out there and make plays. The only reason I agree with him is that he's not the only one saying this, that the system may not fit them.

Q. Do you think it would have sent a message if Mike McCarthy had benched defensive end Johnny Jolly for his head-butting penalty that gave the Vikings a first down after they had been stopped on third down? Or do you think that was just part of the game?


A. No. He has to go after him. He should have got right in his face and let him know the magnitude of it. But I think it's accepted. I think those plays are accepted. Jolly said, hey, that's how he plays. So the coaches know how he plays. They're not surprised that happened. The only one who was surprised is everyone in that stadium. But the coaches weren't surprised. You didn't see any coaches get all bent out of shape. They think it's part of football, just like they think the penalties are part of football. That's the system they play under, that they're going to make mistakes like that and they're OK with that. I don't know why you would be. To me, that's just accepting something that won't work. So you're basically telling me he can do it again and it's OK? I just know if that would have happened with coach Holmgren, he would have been all over you, he would have gotten in your face on national TV. He'd let you know, you can't do that. Just walk off the field. You hold them to a field goal if you walk off the field. You know if it's close you're going to get the flag because all the referees know you're one of the most penalized teams. A guy hit Rodgers right in the back with his helmet when he was scrambling and he didn't get called for spearing. If that was another quarterback, a more elite quarterback, he would have gotten that call. So the Packers have to be smart. Stay away from that stuff. If you want to play with emotion, you have to know when to turn it on and when to turn it off.

Q. Where do you think the Packers go from here?

A. Well, they have to get to 5-3. They have to beat Tampa Bay to start out with. Really, they need to win three straight. If they win three straight, now you're back in the playoff hunt. If you go 2-1, it's tough. If you go 0-3, forget about it. The next goal for the Packers is to win the next three games. Once you win the next three games, now Minnesota can't slip at all. You have to pick up the pieces and get back to what you've done and try to figure out what your players are good at and let them play. Just let them play. Give them the information, the players take the information and you execute it. Too many excuses. I didn't care who my coordinator was, I tried to work his system. But he also has to let me play. It's a team game, but again there's only one person in a helmet.


UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
I disagree with any attempt to compare Brett's performance to Aaron's unless they are in the same situation. Brett can manage the game, yes he can when not getting pressure and the coach is calling slants for him to throw quick on.

Aaron can manage a game, when we are giving him protection, and short patterns. One thing that was notideable was Chilly always had a slant dialed up somewhere for Brett. We didn't. We had players running 5 yards before anyone made any cut for the route. Most were 10-15 or more. We should have 1 if not 2 players running slants, or curls. We need to have that WR short as an option.

Put both QBs in the same scenerio and they both will have the same about of success.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
RedSoxExcel
15 years ago

I disagree with any attempt to compare Brett's performance to Aaron's unless they are in the same situation. Brett can manage the game, yes he can when not getting pressure and the coach is calling slants for him to throw quick on.

Aaron can manage a game, when we are giving him protection, and short patterns. One thing that was notideable was Chilly always had a slant dialed up somewhere for Brett. We didn't. We had players running 5 yards before anyone made any cut for the route. Most were 10-15 or more. We should have 1 if not 2 players running slants, or curls. We need to have that WR short as an option.

Put both QBs in the same scenerio and they both will have the same about of success.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Why do you disagree? I think what Butler is trying to say is that he takes sacks that he shouldn't and holds on to the ball too long (which he does, i.e. that 2nd sack in the 1st half). Why not just throw it away when you outside of the box instead of losing 8 yards. Plus Favre can pick up blitzs a lot better. Woodson said after they game, they threw everything at Favre and he knew it was coming almost every time and got rid of the ball or changed the play. Rodgers is young, he will read defenses better with time. But right now, its not even close in that regard.

Also, if you look at 31-26, late in the 4th, we had the ball and we didn't score. They got the ball and they scored 38-26. You can't really compare two players that play on the same side of the ball but its obviously human nature to do so and we do all the time. But Favre outplayed Rodgers in that game.

Rodgers is young, he will grow as a player but right now Favre is a better game manager. If you had one game right now, one drive, would you honestly choose Rodgers over Favre given all of Favre's experience and ability to run the two minute drill with the pressure on him?

This is not a slight against Rodgers, he's young and we're comparing him to one of the top 10 Qbs of ALL TIME.
blank
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
That is like 3 or 4 sacks our of 14. Rodgers should have run or thrown the ball away. I agree.

What I am saying is that you cannot compare Brett having 0 sacks with no pressure and Rodgers getting sacked 14 times under extreme pressure and talk about it being because Brett manages the game.

The reason Brett is able to manage the game is because he isn't under that pressure. When Brett has been pressured, I have seen him multiple times this year, take the Strahan pose, and just fall on the ground.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
RedSoxExcel
15 years ago
Yeah but I don't think its just the whole OL thing. I also think there is a difference in the ability to read blitzs, change plays, etc.

I would assume that Rodgers has less flexibility than Favre to change plays as he is younger and the coach does not trust him as much, which makes sense. But sometimes, its not about how the OL does, its about how you read the defense. I bet if you watch the game again, you will see Favre running around talking to the players before the snap just before the blitz happened. Woodson said everytime, his pointed it out, got rid of the ball or changed plays. Favre isn't perfect because I'm pretty sure he has taken a lot of sacks too (though a lot of them were early when he was still getting used to the team).

Perfect example though is before this week, Manning, I think had ZERO sacks (not sure though). And he is a guy that always changes the play at the line. Maybe he just has the best OL in the world (they're good) but I would guess part of it is his ability to read the defense's set.

We can start handicapping Rodgers because of OL, but then you would have to handicap Favre for being FORTY and having all the pressure in the world on him that game. Would you say Cutler is one of the best QBs in the league because his Forte has played GARBAGE this season and does anyone even know who his WRs are?

What cost us the game was the first half. Our offense was useless (defense was decent but not great). We were down 24-3 with 3 minutes into the 2nd half, its hard to win games like that.
blank
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
Favre doesn't, and never has changed plays. The WCO is built so QBs don't need to call audibles. Almost every play has options, so they just check to different options.

Checking to runs, and calling hot routes is the WCO. Rodgers is close to 75% against the Biltz, so that isn't the problem. The problem is you don't call hot routes when the defense is rushing base.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
longtimefan
15 years ago

(defense was decent but not great). We were down 24-3 with 3 minutes into the 2nd half, its hard to win games like that.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Defense was HORRIBLE

stop them for a Fg att but a dumb ass head butt and thats a 4 point swing..

Then s/t can't tackle at all and then on top of that, the defense is allowing 3rd and long completions..You saw what happened when they get to the q/b but they failed on so many crucial times in the 1st half its just annoying..
zombieslayer
15 years ago

I disagree with any attempt to compare Brett's performance to Aaron's unless they are in the same situation. Brett can manage the game, yes he can when not getting pressure and the coach is calling slants for him to throw quick on.

Aaron can manage a game, when we are giving him protection, and short patterns. One thing that was notideable was Chilly always had a slant dialed up somewhere for Brett. We didn't. We had players running 5 yards before anyone made any cut for the route. Most were 10-15 or more. We should have 1 if not 2 players running slants, or curls. We need to have that WR short as an option.

Put both QBs in the same scenerio and they both will have the same about of success.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



+1.

I really hate saying this. Seriously. This makes me sick to the stomach saying this. But I have to say it.

Childress' playcalling was better than MM's.

Yikes. The whole thought makes me sick.

How come MM didn't look across the field and do the same thing Childress was doing? Send either Driver or Jennings on short slants or set up some WR and RB screens. Heck, have either Driver or Jennings simply turn around and the ball will be there. Allow them to juke the CB and gain a quick 5-6 yards.

Favre was doing that all night, and that opened up the deeper routes which Favre was completing. Aaron could have been doing the same thing, and instead of 6 sacks, there probably would have been 3.

EDIT: Forgot to add. Back to Butler. Note what he says about Holmgren and penalties and the crap Jolly did.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago
So I'm an ex-RB and will admit right off that I'm not a passing game guru.

But I keep hearing "run the short slants" as if they're a given, and I;m wondering if it's that simple. When they're (the Vikes) getting strong pressure with a 4-man rush, the aren't there 7 guys out in coverage - and might several of them be hanging around where you'd want to hit those quick slants? As in they're not a given and they've not been there for Rodgers when he hits that 3rd step? I'm asking, so let's not get snippy.

What I seem to see a number of times: Rodgers gets to his quick drop, looks and something doesn't seem to be there, tries to go to his next reads and then is caught up in the rush - we all know how the rest of the story goes.

So what I'm asking is: If you've got a situation where the opposing D is able to rush 4 guys and keep everyone else out in coverage, could those defenses not be taking those quick slants away?

I've decided to hold my tongue on the whole "Rodgers holds the ball too long!" deal - put simply, I don't agree, and moreover that's a critique that depends on whether it works or not. Roethlesberger gets praised all the time for the same thing, but the words change to something like "keeps working to extend the play". I'd rather my QB keep giving that effort, even if it leads to a couple more sacks per year.
blank
Stevetarded
15 years ago
Right now what we have is a line that gives our QB as much time vs a 4 man rush as other teams get against a blitz. On top of that an ineffective running game. It looks like Rodgers is holding the ball too long but he needs more time because the receivers are outnumbered. All of the other teams LBs and extra DBs can be committed to coverage basically.

Just about every time that Rodgers escapes the rush and buys more time he completes a pass to an open guy. That's because that is how long it takes for the receivers to get through all of that extra coverage. If we can ever make it to where teams have to blitz to get pressure this offense will just explode.
blank
Fan Shout
wpr (5h) : Me do-ed it gooderly,
Zero2Cool (19h) : Bahah, I was like WTF why isn't anyone posting on PP.com ... oops no one has permissions
dfosterf (21h) : tell her I reckon
dfosterf (21h) : Micah Robinson cut. Probable PS player tomorrow. Has to call mom back and t
Zero2Cool (23h) : New site so much better. Might make switch and deal with it.
dfosterf (23h) : Mecole Hardman to our practice squad
dfosterf (23h) : Nick Nieman from Texans our 5th linebacker. Special teams signing
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Looks like we signed Clayton Tune as QB3
wpr (27-Aug) : TKT people lose their minds over QB3. Point is almost none of them are ready that's why they are on the PS and other teams don't take them.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
dfosterf (27-Aug) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (27-Aug) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (27-Aug) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (27-Aug) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (27-Aug) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : what is Schefter saying?
dfosterf (27-Aug) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
dfosterf (27-Aug) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
dfosterf (26-Aug) : *Orzech*
dfosterf (26-Aug) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
wpr (26-Aug) : YES!!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (26-Aug) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
wpr (26-Aug) : He played pretty good.
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : NAZIR STACKHOUSE HAS MADE THE 53
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : NOOOOO KALEN IS GONE
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : Kalen King and Kamal Hadden making it. me thinks
schroeder84 (26-Aug) : @dfosterf I suspect Elgersma WILL be hard to hide. Raw, but talented
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : pp.com is broken, halt testing, gotta go do work things for a bit
hardrocker950 (26-Aug) : Mecole Hardman was released, to the surprise of few
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : PP.com updated. Reset Password works, and now User Profile pages are a thing
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Soft hope plan is having fantasy football weekly on-site that i build. cannot do that with this setup.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

19h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.