15 years ago
I'm all about Best too. I think he would be a massive steal for us, if he slips down the board.
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
15 years ago
Ryan Grant has been great this season. We shouldn't draft a RB early. You know why? We're gonna need depth on a shitload of positions, and we're gonna risk a lot if we go RB early. Right now we need at least one OT, one G, one DE, and one safety. And a cornerback, another OT and a OLB wouldn't hurt either.
This is a placeholder
15 years ago
Oh don't get me wrong. I'm not concerned about the RB position at all, really. I just want a dynamic weapon to supplement the well run offense with good players at each position. Best is a serious weapon who can make things happen beyond the execution of the offensive scheme.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
I just want someone to counter Percy Harvin. I want that big threat out of the backfield. I'm not saying make him the starter. I'm saying bring him in to complement Ryan Grant. That would be a great 1-2 punch.

Also, if Spiller is somehow still around at our pick, I think we HAVE to take him. If we didn't I don't know what I would do. I would be SO pissed off.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago
Walter Football 

23 - Green Bay Packers: Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa

Aaron Rodgers has received much better pass protection since losing to the Buccaneers, but relying on Chad Clifton and Mark Tauscher for another year is not a good idea. Green Bay's No. 1 priority this offseason is finding a top-notch left tackle for Rodgers.



I missed a week, but by losing our last game and moving one spot up the draft chart again, we went back from Barksdale to Bulaga. Something I prefer. If Bulaga is gone, I'd rather take a long look at Jerry Hughes than reach on a tackle like Barksdale.

Bulaga is fine by me, this late in the 1st round.

NFL Draft Dog 

26 - OLB/DE Brandon Graham, Michigan

Graham would be the perfect fit in the Packers 34 defense. He could play OLB opposite Clay Mathews.

Graham has been super productive this year, ranked #1 in the nation with 26 tackles for loss (TFL) and 10.5 sacks.



With Hughes being long gone in this mock draft by 26, this would be a great value pick. Apparently, he can get to the QB quite well and has progressed every year in college. Who knows where he can go?

Draft Countdown 

26 - Green Bay Packers, Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa

Shoddy offensive line play has absolutely killed the Packers at times in 2009, which is ironic because they have actually invested quite a few draft resources on blockers over the years. Unfortunately most of those picks have been devoted to interior guys and they have neglected the tackle position. Chad Clifton is now in his mid-30s and once again battling injuries so its time to bring in a top talent to groom as his successor. Iowas Bryan Bulaga isnt the elite pro prospect that some have made him out to be, at least not yet, but he could be a factor in the mid-to-late first round if he opts to go pro after his junior season. A good but not great athlete with prototypical size and long arms, Bulaga is a solid all-around blocker who can hold his own as a pass protector and also maul in the run game. A local Midwest product, Bulaga would be an ideal fit in Green Bay, where he could begin his career on the right side before eventually replacing Clifton at left tackle. The additions of B.J. Raji and Clay Matthews in round one last year were a very good start but the Packers still need some more help on defense too as they continue their conversion to a 3-4 scheme.



This one finally updated again. We drop 6 spots, but still get dealt Bulaga. I think I've said enough about him.

Football's Future 

26 - Green Bay - Charles Brown, OT, USC

Keeping Aaron Rodgers healthy and on the field is a must for the Packers to continue to improve. Chad Clifton isnt getting any younger and isnt the best pass blocker regardless. Brown is an excellent athlete that has the toughness to fit in. He may need a little work and some time to bulk up, but Brown has the ability to be a very solid left tackle.



I don't see Brown falling to the 26 spot. Just like I don't see Spiller dropping to 21, where this site had him mocked to us, as well.

Maybe this is possibility if Brown does something horrible at the combine. Something like posting low on all the agility drills. That'd hurt him tremendously, as he's known as an athletic guy, having played TE before converting to an OT.
Rockmolder
14 years ago
Walter Football 

24 - Green Bay Packers: Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa

Aaron Rodgers has received much better pass protection since losing to the Buccaneers, but relying on Chad Clifton and Mark Tauscher for another year is not a good idea. Green Bay's No. 1 priority this offseason is finding a top-notch left tackle for Rodgers.



Still Bulaga. Still great value for the draft spot. Still a great pick.

NFL Draft Dog 

26 - RB Jahvid Best, California (JR)

Best (5' 10" 195 lbs) is extremely productive, strong and fast.

The Packers need a franchise type running back and Best could be the guy.



I'd still love a guy like Spiller or Best, but with the emergence of Brandon Jackson, I doubt that we'll invest a 1st round pick in one of those kind of guys.

With Mike Iupati and Bruce Campbell still on the board in this mock draft, I have to think that one of those would be the pick. Especially Campbell would be too good to pass up on.

Football's Future 

26 - Green Bay - Charles Brown, OT, USC

The Pack did well with a Trojan on defense last year with Clay Matthews in the first round, so they decide to go back to Southern California for their top pick this year. Brown is a very good pass blocker but also plays with a toughness that allows him to make up for his lack of bulk. He will need to pack on some weight in the NFL, but his ability as a pass protector will make Aaron Rodgers very happy.



Same guy, different write-up. If he somehow falls to the 26th pick, we could declare this draft an A already.

Draft Ace 

23 - Trent Williams, OT, Oklahoma

The Packers have allowed a league-leading 50 sacks this season. A good number of those are due to Aaron Rodgers' tendency to hang on to the football far too long, but the offensive line could certainly be upgraded. Trent Williams has really struggled at left tackle this season, but on the right side in 2008 he was among the most dominant in the college game. Despite the poor performance this season, he still have potential and the Packers are one of the teams that may be willing to take a risk.



This pick is a very risky one. You have Bulaga on the board, someone who will most likely be a solid tackle, and you have Trent Williams, someone with tons of potential but has been struggling immensely this year at LT.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
I don't like the idea of picking a "risky" player in the 1st round. That is what the 5-7 rounds are for.
In the 1st round I want a guy who is going to be a starter. (Or in Rodgers case when drafting for the future and not need, a guy who is going to be a starter some day.)
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

I don't like the idea of picking a "risky" player in the 1st round. That is what the 5-7 rounds are for.
In the 1st round I want a guy who is going to be a starter. (Or in Rodgers case when drafting for the future and not need, a guy who is going to be a starter some day.)

"wpr" wrote:



I agree to a certain extent. You don't want to come out of the first round with a bust, obviously. You can suffer a huge setback by just one pick, if your division opponents do draft well.

On the other side, you have a prospect who has the upside to turn into a, for instance, Jason Peters. An elite tackle in the league. One who you can match up with Jared Allen and feel comfortable about.

Then again, that same guy can be a Gosder Cherilus, stuck on the right side of that line and most likely on your bench or on another team after a year or three.

I'd be happy with Bulaga. I think he'd be a good tackle in this league. I just don't know how good. I don't know how high his ceiling is. You don't want to spent a first rounder on an average guy, either. Especially not if you're in the division with the Vikings. And building a franchise starts at the lines, anyway.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
I was speaking mainly about Trent Williams "Despite the poor performance this season, he still have potential and the Packers are one of the teams that may be willing to take a risk."

Campbell is another iffy pick.
OT Bruce Campbell, Maryland (JR) "Campbell is a little raw, but the Cardinals really need to upgrade the tackle position."
"Bruce Campbell is a boom-or-bust prospect, but he's sure to be selected earlier than his collegiate performance would indicate due to his size and strength. "

One of the mock draft sites say that the OL is pretty weak this year. I just don't want GB selecting a 3rd round talent in the 1st because they need to fill a hole.

Several of the "experts" have GB taking the 5th best OT. It concerns me as to the quality of the player. He may be someone who would still be around in the 2nd round.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

I was speaking mainly about Trent Williams "Despite the poor performance this season, he still have potential and the Packers are one of the teams that may be willing to take a risk."

Campbell is another iffy pick.
OT Bruce Campbell, Maryland (JR) "Campbell is a little raw, but the Cardinals really need to upgrade the tackle position."
"Bruce Campbell is a boom-or-bust prospect, but he's sure to be selected earlier than his collegiate performance would indicate due to his size and strength. "

One of the mock draft sites say that the OL is pretty weak this year. I just don't want GB selecting a 3rd round talent in the 1st because they need to fill a hole.

Several of the "experts" have GB taking the 5th best OT. It concerns me as to the quality of the player. He may be someone who would still be around in the 2nd round.

"wpr" wrote:



That's true. I don't want us to reach. I'd rather have us trade back and address another need a bit earlier on or trade up and get an elite tackle.

That said, if we do have Brown on the board at 23, I think the risk can be justified. He's pretty much in the same boat. Too light to play LT immediatly. Like you quoted, the risk is pretty high, but he's a first round talent, already, and that's at his current weigth. He's amazingly agile for an OT. I think that, with a proffesional staff, he could bulk up a bit and be an elite tackle for times to come.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (4h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (5h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (5h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (7h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (7h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (8h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (8h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (8h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (8h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (8h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (8h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (8h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (8h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (8h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (9h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (9h) : Packers will get in
beast (9h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.