Rockmolder
15 years ago

So is this your coming out party, Ory? Lol.

Anyway, I agree. Cutler did look very good. And this was not against some horrible team. This is against a contender. The defense did better than I expected. I still think that Tinoisamoa is one of the better additions the Bears made. It injects some youth into that linebacking core.

Overall a very strong showing. A lot better than last weeks.

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



Coming out party?

"Rockmolder" wrote:



The fitting avatar. The optimism. :tongue:

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



🤫 I'll change it again next week. I had the Packers one last week and the Vikings one the week before that. I already used the Lions one when I first joined this forum around draft time. Whom should I go with next week? It's gotta be one of a team that's a top story. Right now Cutler is a top story again, I guess I could go with a Vikings one again with all the Favre hoopla going on. Pick one. The funny thing is, when I first read your "coming out" comment, I thought you were referring to sexual preferences.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Beastiality seems to be popular with Bears fans, so it's fitting in multiple ways.

But ask yourself, do you really want to put that Bears avatar away? Do you really want to go around as the man without a team? We won't mind it if you're a Bears fan, we have all embraced Vikesrule, Polargrizz, Formo etc.
Orygunfan76
15 years ago

So is this your coming out party, Ory? Lol.

Anyway, I agree. Cutler did look very good. And this was not against some horrible team. This is against a contender. The defense did better than I expected. I still think that Tinoisamoa is one of the better additions the Bears made. It injects some youth into that linebacking core.

Overall a very strong showing. A lot better than last weeks.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Coming out party?

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



The fitting avatar. The optimism. :tongue:

"Rockmolder" wrote:



🤫 I'll change it again next week. I had the Packers one last week and the Vikings one the week before that. I already used the Lions one when I first joined this forum around draft time. Whom should I go with next week? It's gotta be one of a team that's a top story. Right now Cutler is a top story again, I guess I could go with a Vikings one again with all the Favre hoopla going on. Pick one. The funny thing is, when I first read your "coming out" comment, I thought you were referring to sexual preferences.

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



Beastiality seems to be popular with Bears fans, so it's fitting in multiple ways.

But ask yourself, do you really want to put that Bears avatar away? Do you really want to go around as the man without a team? We won't mind it if you're a Bears fan, we have all embraced Vikesrule, Polargrizz, Formo etc.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



I have a team, the Oregon Ducks. Beastiality huh? You seem to know a bit too much about it there Rock(keep that shit at home in the bedroom.) And No I don't need an NFL identity on here, I've seen how "serious " you guys take those you mentioned. :thumbleft:
blank
Rockmolder
15 years ago

So is this your coming out party, Ory? Lol.

Anyway, I agree. Cutler did look very good. And this was not against some horrible team. This is against a contender. The defense did better than I expected. I still think that Tinoisamoa is one of the better additions the Bears made. It injects some youth into that linebacking core.

Overall a very strong showing. A lot better than last weeks.

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



Coming out party?

"Rockmolder" wrote:



The fitting avatar. The optimism. :tongue:

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



🤫 I'll change it again next week. I had the Packers one last week and the Vikings one the week before that. I already used the Lions one when I first joined this forum around draft time. Whom should I go with next week? It's gotta be one of a team that's a top story. Right now Cutler is a top story again, I guess I could go with a Vikings one again with all the Favre hoopla going on. Pick one. The funny thing is, when I first read your "coming out" comment, I thought you were referring to sexual preferences.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Beastiality seems to be popular with Bears fans, so it's fitting in multiple ways.

But ask yourself, do you really want to put that Bears avatar away? Do you really want to go around as the man without a team? We won't mind it if you're a Bears fan, we have all embraced Vikesrule, Polargrizz, Formo etc.

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



I have a team, the Oregon Ducks. Beastiality huh? You seem to know a bit too much about it there Rock(keep that shit at home in the bedroom.) And No I don't need an NFL identity on here, I've seen how "serious " you guys take those you mentioned. :thumbleft:

"Rockmolder" wrote:



LOL. Fair enough. Although I really do take Formo seriously. Same goes for Vikesrule when he makes one of his posts that's not in humour. Polar, well, he's just here to stir shit up, usually.

Like I said, fair enough, your choice. Wouldn't hurt your integrity with me one bit, though. Lions, Bears or Patriots fan for that matter.
Orygunfan76
15 years ago

So is this your coming out party, Ory? Lol.

Anyway, I agree. Cutler did look very good. And this was not against some horrible team. This is against a contender. The defense did better than I expected. I still think that Tinoisamoa is one of the better additions the Bears made. It injects some youth into that linebacking core.

Overall a very strong showing. A lot better than last weeks.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Coming out party?

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



The fitting avatar. The optimism. :tongue:

"Rockmolder" wrote:



🤫 I'll change it again next week. I had the Packers one last week and the Vikings one the week before that. I already used the Lions one when I first joined this forum around draft time. Whom should I go with next week? It's gotta be one of a team that's a top story. Right now Cutler is a top story again, I guess I could go with a Vikings one again with all the Favre hoopla going on. Pick one. The funny thing is, when I first read your "coming out" comment, I thought you were referring to sexual preferences.

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



Beastiality seems to be popular with Bears fans, so it's fitting in multiple ways.

But ask yourself, do you really want to put that Bears avatar away? Do you really want to go around as the man without a team? We won't mind it if you're a Bears fan, we have all embraced Vikesrule, Polargrizz, Formo etc.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



I have a team, the Oregon Ducks. Beastiality huh? You seem to know a bit too much about it there Rock(keep that shit at home in the bedroom.) And No I don't need an NFL identity on here, I've seen how "serious " you guys take those you mentioned. :thumbleft:

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



LOL. Fair enough. Although I really do take Formo seriously. Same goes for Vikesrule when he makes one of his posts that's not in humour. Polar, well, he's just here to stir shit up, usually.

Like I said, fair enough, your choice. Wouldn't hurt your integrity with me one bit, though. Lions, Bears or Patriots fan for that matter.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



It's all good manand yes, Polar does seem a bit controversial.
blank
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (6h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (14h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (14h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (14h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (14h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (16h) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

9h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.