Add to that playing a 6-10 team twice. ::wink:

I think definitely yes. Majority of the D from the 13-3 campaign, with a more aggressive scheme. Never understood the old defensive scheme. Was like letting the offense come to them instead of bringing the fight to the offense,(except the secondary).

Should mean less time for the secondary to cover, also like the 3 down lineman, because they are going to be 3 big men which should chew up some blockers.

---

{fingers plugged into ears} lalalalalalalalallalalalallalallalalalla

:lol:

---

Call me a pedant, but my eyes tend to glide right over posts that have no punctuation or capitalization. I prefer not having to decipher another person's writing; I figure if they actually care about what they say, they'll expend the extra effort to ensure it's readable. ;)

But yes, I stand by my offseason prediction of 10-6 and am looking forward to the preseason game this weekend.

---

8 to 11 wins is what I see. This team is going to go into the season with a lot of questions, but also a ton of potential. I think the Packers have the most complete roster in terms of talent in the division. It's them or the Vikings. I prefer GB's youth to Minnesota's. Perhaps I'm a tad bias though.

Anyhow I just don't think this is rocket science.

It's mental math.

2 + 2 = 4

Healthy Players + Better Coaches = Better Defense/Team

---

It is.
93% have said "yes".

---

And the 3 percent who haven't, what can I say? :sign3:

I kid because I care.

---

I HOPE that we are better in 2009. If we aren't, we are in trouble.

---