I wonder what extenuating circumstances led to this verdict.
"TheEngineer" wrote:
Probably the fact that he has/had butt-tons of money and was able to pay the victims' family a nice 'I'm sorry' package.
"Formo" wrote:
That shouldn't have anything to do with the jury's/judge's verdict, but only on the victim suing Stallworth in a civil case (and probably likely that the victims could receive damages given the preponderance of the evidence). The criminal matter of manslaughter is (hopefully) independent of that.
"TheEngineer" wrote: