Martha Careful
a month ago
Rcon14 wrote

The Packers, Scheme Fit and Roster Construction
The difficult decisions of being a decision maker

By rcon14 Mar 5, 2025, 2:05pm CST

Most of the time when a general manager is being interviewed at the NFL Combine, they say very little of interest. General managers are, by design, trying to give out the most milquetoast of answers simply to get the media availability over with and get back to their real job. Every now and then, though, you do get a peak behind the curtain to not only what their thought process is, but to what the thought process is of the organization. Thanks to former APC contributor Tyler Brooke, we did get a little peak behind the philosophical curtain. Unfortunately, the audio of the question is extremely difficult to pick up, so it has been edited out, but to paraphrase the question a bit: How much does scheme impact your process in acquiring players?


The snarky “no particular reason” I mention in the tweet is that this morning Wendell Ferreira and Destin Adams of A to Z Sports reported that Green Bay has an interest in Colts defensive end Dayo Odeyingbo, who is set to hit free agency next week. This article isn’t meant to be a large scouting report on Odeyingbo, so I’m not going to spend too much time on him, but a paragraph of context is necessary for the broader point.

Oyedingbo is an oversized defensive end, coming in at 6’6’’ and 286 pounds, per the Colts' website. This size and strength make him a solid edge-setter in the run game, but he has not provided significant pass-rush production. His 12% pressure rate in 2024 falls well behind legitimate pass-rushing threats in this free agent class like Chase Young and Khalil Mack. Our own Justis Mosqueda looked at pressures over expected, and Odeyingbo measured in at slightly below average for the past two seasons at -3.5. Long story short, for a team that needs immediate impact pass rush production across from Rashan Gary, Odeyingbo has not shown he can provide that.

With that out of the way, this is not the first time Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst has talked about scheme having a more limited impact on their player acquisition strategy. In fact, it was specific to the defensive end position. He said after Jeff Hafley was hired to be the defensive coordinator that once you start targeting smaller players up front you can get small in a real hurry. Now whether Gutekunst is just talking to fill space in an answer or genuinely means these things is tough to know, and only the actions he takes over the next two months will provide us any real insight. But it does get at a fundamental tension that exists in team construction: You want to make sure you are giving your coaches the tools they need to properly implement the type of football they want to play while also insulating yourself as an organization if that does not work and you need to pivot to something else.

This is an understandable tension for Gutekunst to be keenly aware of. The Packers have had nearly unprecedented levels of front-office stability over the past thirty-plus years. Only a brief period with head coach/GM Mike Sherman from 2001-2004 interrupts what is basically a thirty-year Ron Wolf dynasty with Ted Thompson taking over in 2005 (Thompson worked directly under Wolf from 1993-1999) and then Brian Gutekunst taking over from Thompson (Gutekunst worked as a scout for Wolf from 99-00 and under Thompson from 2005 until being hired as the general manager in 2018) in 2017. With that level of stability at the top, the Packers have had the privilege of rarely needing to scramble because of job insecurity. However, there is a downside to overstating how future-focused and coach-insulated you need to be as a GM.

NFL timelines are very short. Players careers just are not that long, and because of how much churn occurs and because of how little money is guaranteed to players at any given time (outside of superstars), you can flip a roster around entirely within just a couple of seasons. The Packers are a perfect example of this, resembling almost none of their 2021 self this past season, or even by 2023.

With that editorial note established, it is then important to note just how divorced the Packers defensive end room is compared to the rest of the coaching tree that Jeff Hafley comes from. Five teams had either defensive coordinators or head coaches that came from that same tree: Houston, Indianapolis, San Francisco, the New York Jets, and Green Bay. Here are the weights of the players who earned at least 250 EDGE alignment snaps per NFL Next Gen Stats:

HOU: Danielle Hunter 263, Will Anderson 243, Derek Barnett 258
IND: Kwity Paye 265, Laiatu Latu 265, Dayo Odeyingbo 286, Tyquan Lewis 260
SF: Nick Bosa 266, Leonard Floyd 240, Sam Okuayinonu 269, Yetur Gross-Matos 265
NYJ: Will McDonald 236, Michael Clemons 262, Haason Reddick 240*
*Reddick included because his snap count would have been higher if not for his contract situation

Meanwhile, Green Bay’s defensive end room looked like such:

Rashan Gary 278, Kingsley Enagbare 258, Lukas Van Ness 275, Preston Smith 272
Brenton Cox had 148 snaps and weighs 249 pounds. The two lighter defensive ends in the room were a fifth-round pick and an undrafted free agent, respectively. This heavier version of edge player made more sense in Joe Barry’s quarters-heavier split-safety system where defensive ends are asked to hold up longer at the point of attack in run defense, so as to allow the safeties adequate time to be alley players in the run game. Green Bay was effectively playing a gap light in the box on most snaps, thus necessitating the front six players to slow-play things, allowing the fill defenders time. But on early downs, Jeff Hafley is going to show more single-high looks, adding an extra body to cover every gap with a player.

This does not necessitate the same body types on the edge, and faster or twitchier players can be targeted. That is not to say that size in and of itself is some sort of problem. Myles Garrett, despite being 271 pounds, would not be a bad addition, nor would Reggie White at 290 pounds be out of place in this defense, but it’s just that there are not many Myles Garretts or Reggie Whites to go around. And what Green Bay sorely needs more than stout run defense from their defensive end room is the ability to get quick and consistent pressure, something the room struggled mightily with all season. In his answer, Gutekunst talked about how what Hafley was doing changed over the course of the year as he figured out what was and wasn’t going to work. The reason things had to be changed so much is that the front four wasn’t good enough to get home, which just isn’t an acceptable outcome regardless of scheme, but in particular in the tree that Hafley comes from.

In response to that, Hafley had to dial up a lot more simulated pressures, and in particular, had to bring pressures from the linebacker level, which vacates a body in the middle of the field, where we saw Green Bay get routinely torched down the home stretch of the season. The central tension in the defense, from Gus Bradley through Robert Saleh, is that our pass rush is going to be able to get home before you’re able to throw the in-breakers, deep crossers, or flood the deep zones. If Green Bay cannot get quick pressure, that structure of defense is not going to work.

Gutekunst may ideologically want larger defensive ends, especially after watching the Packers run defense struggle for what felt like a decade, but if you hire Jeff Hafley, you need to let Jeff Hafley run the defense you hired him to run. It doesn’t make sense to hire Jeff Hafley and then he has to pivot and run a defense you didn’t hire him to run because you didn’t get him the correct personnel to run the defense you hired him to run. If it doesn’t work and blows up, you can make the roster adjustments, likely within a single off-season, and move forward.

I thought this column was interesting and thought provoking.
Go Packers!!!!
Zero2Cool
a month ago

The difficult decisions of being a decision maker

Most of the time when a general manager is being interviewed at the NFL Combine , they say very little of interest. General managers are, by design, trying to give out the most milquetoast of answers simply to get the media availability over with and get back to their real job. Every now and then, though, you do get a peak behind the curtain to not only what their thought process is, but to what the thought process is of the organization. Thanks to former APC contributor Tyler Brooke, we did get a little peak behind the philosophical curtain. Unfortunately, the audio of the question is extremely difficult to pick up, so it has been edited out, but to paraphrase the question a bit: How much does scheme impact your process in acquiring players?

Gute's answer to @TylerDBrooke 's question at the Combine of how much the particulars of the defensive scheme impacts their player acquisition. Thinking of this this morning for no particular reason. pic.twitter.com/prztyLKruo 
— rcon14 (@rcon14) March 5, 2025 

The snarky “no particular reason” I mention in the tweet is that this morning Wendell Ferreira and Destin Adams of A to Z Sports reported  that Green Bay has an interest in Colts defensive end Dayo Odeyingbo, who is set to hit free agency next week. This article isn’t meant to be a large scouting report on Odeyingbo, so I’m not going to spend too much time on him, but a paragraph of context is necessary for the broader point.

Oyedingbo is an oversized defensive end, coming in at 6’6’’ and 286 pounds, per the Colts' website. This size and strength make him a solid edge-setter in the run game, but he has not provided significant pass-rush production. His 12% pressure rate in 2024 falls well behind legitimate pass-rushing threats in this free agent class like Chase Young and Khalil Mack. Our own Justis Mosqueda looked at pressures over expected , and Odeyingbo measured in at slightly below average for the past two seasons at -3.5. Long story short, for a team that needs immediate impact pass rush production across from Rashan Gary, Odeyingbo has not shown he can provide that.

With that out of the way, this is not the first time Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst has talked about scheme having a more limited impact on their player acquisition strategy. In fact, it was specific to the defensive end position. He said after Jeff Hafley was hired to be the defensive coordinator that once you start targeting smaller players up front you can get small in a real hurry. Now whether Gutekunst is just talking to fill space in an answer or genuinely means these things is tough to know, and only the actions he takes over the next two months will provide us any real insight. But it does get at a fundamental tension that exists in team construction: You want to make sure you are giving your coaches the tools they need to properly implement the type of football they want to play while also insulating yourself as an organization if that does not work and you need to pivot to something else.

This is an understandable tension for Gutekunst to be keenly aware of. The Packers have had nearly unprecedented levels of front-office stability over the past thirty-plus years. Only a brief period with head coach/GM Mike Sherman from 2001-2004 interrupts what is basically a thirty-year Ron Wolf dynasty with Ted Thompson taking over in 2005 (Thompson worked directly under Wolf from 1993-1999) and then Brian Gutekunst taking over from Thompson (Gutekunst worked as a scout for Wolf from 99-00 and under Thompson from 2005 until being hired as the general manager in 2018) in 2017. With that level of stability at the top, the Packers have had the privilege of rarely needing to scramble because of job insecurity. However, there is a downside to overstating how future-focused and coach-insulated you need to be as a GM.

NFL timelines are very short. Players careers just are not that long, and because of how much churn occurs and because of how little money is guaranteed to players at any given time (outside of superstars), you can flip a roster around entirely within just a couple of seasons. The Packers are a perfect example of this, resembling almost none of their 2021 self this past season, or even by 2023.

With that editorial note established, it is then important to note just how divorced the Packers defensive end room is compared to the rest of the coaching tree that Jeff Hafley comes from. Five teams had either defensive coordinators or head coaches that came from that same tree: Houston, Indianapolis, San Francisco, the New York Jets, and Green Bay. Here are the weights of the players who earned at least 250 EDGE alignment snaps per NFL Next Gen Stats:

HOU: Danielle Hunter 263, Will Anderson 243, Derek Barnett 258
IND: Kwity Paye 265, Laiatu Latu 265, Dayo Odeyingbo 286, Tyquan Lewis 260
SF: Nick Bosa 266, Leonard Floyd 240, Sam Okuayinonu 269, Yetur Gross-Matos 265
NYJ: Will McDonald 236, Michael Clemons 262, Haason Reddick 240*

*Reddick included because his snap count would have been higher if not for his contract situation

Meanwhile, Green Bay’s defensive end room looked like such:
Rashan Gary 278, Kingsley Enagbare 258, Lukas Van Ness 275, Preston Smith 272

Brenton Cox had 148 snaps and weighs 249 pounds. The two lighter defensive ends in the room were a fifth-round pick and an undrafted free agent, respectively. This heavier version of edge player made more sense in Joe Barry’s quarters-heavier split-safety system where defensive ends are asked to hold up longer at the point of attack in run defense, so as to allow the safeties adequate time to be alley players in the run game. Green Bay was effectively playing a gap light in the box on most snaps, thus necessitating the front six players to slow-play things, allowing the fill defenders time. But on early downs, Jeff Hafley is going to show more single-high looks, adding an extra body to cover every gap with a player.

This does not necessitate the same body types on the edge, and faster or twitchier players can be targeted. That is not to say that size in and of itself is some sort of problem. Myles Garrett, despite being 271 pounds, would not be a bad addition, nor would Reggie White at 290 pounds be out of place in this defense, but it’s just that there are not many Myles Garretts or Reggie Whites to go around. And what Green Bay sorely needs more than stout run defense from their defensive end room is the ability to get quick and consistent pressure, something the room struggled mightily with all season. In his answer, Gutekunst talked about how what Hafley was doing changed over the course of the year as he figured out what was and wasn’t going to work. The reason things had to be changed so much is that the front four wasn’t good enough to get home, which just isn’t an acceptable outcome regardless of scheme, but in particular in the tree that Hafley comes from.

In response to that, Hafley had to dial up a lot more simulated pressures, and in particular, had to bring pressures from the linebacker level, which vacates a body in the middle of the field, where we saw Green Bay get routinely torched down the home stretch of the season. The central tension in the defense, from Gus Bradley through Robert Saleh, is that our pass rush is going to be able to get home before you’re able to throw the in-breakers, deep crossers, or flood the deep zones. If Green Bay cannot get quick pressure, that structure of defense is not going to work.

Gutekunst may ideologically want larger defensive ends, especially after watching the Packers run defense struggle for what felt like a decade, but if you hire Jeff Hafley, you need to let Jeff Hafley run the defense you hired him to run. It doesn’t make sense to hire Jeff Hafley and then he has to pivot and run a defense you didn’t hire him to run because you didn’t get him the correct personnel to run the defense you hired him to run. If it doesn’t work and blows up, you can make the roster adjustments, likely within a single off-season, and move forward.


Continue Reading @ rcon14 

rcon14 wrote:



Interesting and one could say, provoking of thought. 😜
Martha Careful
a month ago

Interesting and one could say, provoking of thought. 😜

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

 Wait...What did you Say.gif You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Go Packers!!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (1-Apr) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : The method for measuring first downs in the NFL will switch from chain gangs to camera-based technology in 2025, the league announced.
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : A big step in the right direction. Just put in the college system is very very good.
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : NFL has passed a rule that allows both teams to possess the ball in OT during the regular season
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : Touchbacks on kickoffs will now bring the ball to the 35-yard line.
beast (31-Mar) : It might of gotten more popular recently, but braiding hair (even men) in certain cultures goes back for centuries.
Martha Careful (30-Mar) : Is men braiding their hair a new style thing? Watching the NCAA men's tournament many players have done
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Ha. Well, it'd be nice for folks to reset their own password. Via validated email 😏
beast (29-Mar) : Monopoly was supposed to be an educational game, that show how evil capitalism was and how we should avoid it
beast (29-Mar) : Lol, I was thinking username would be better, as then I wouldn't have to keep an email up to date lol 😂
beast (29-Mar) : Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (29-Mar) : sure is
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Monopoly is a rip off of The Landlord's Game
wpr (27-Mar) : 28 days until the draft
earthquake (27-Mar) : Which seemed strange to my 9 year old self, that you could be a fan for a team other than the one you play for
earthquake (27-Mar) : Nothing eventful happened, other than it being clear that he was a bengals fan
earthquake (27-Mar) : And we went and hung out with him one afternoon, I must have been 9 or so
earthquake (27-Mar) : That’s wild, when I was a kid my friend lived in the same apartment complex in De Pere
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : Only career highspot was a 200 yard rushing game while playing for the Cardinals
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : He is a former Packer. Drafted out of Northern Illinois. Didn't do much in GB.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Despicable
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Former NFL. I think Packers too
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : NFL RB Leshon Johnson has been charged in a massive dog fighting operation, with the FBI seizing over 190 Pit Bulls
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Some real irony of a QB as short as Wilson playing for the Giants
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Giants country, let's be the tall beings of lore!
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Russell Wilson signs with the Giants.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (25-Mar) : I don't think there is a significant difference. I use a user name for many. Others email.
Martha Careful (25-Mar) : email
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : would it be better to use EMAIL or USERNAME to log into a site?
wpr (25-Mar) : Thanks Zero
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

8-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-Mar / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.