Matt LaFleur eager to see Jordan Love get lots of work during OTAs· Page 3

PackersNation
Registered

2 years ago

This is false information. Brian Gutekunst was ecstatic on draft night when the selection was made. A little more so than other picks. After Rodgers 2017, 2018 and 2019 seasons it gave indication Rodgers was nearing the end. Jordan Love was projected to be the future. Rodgers had a fire lit under his ass and ripped off back-to-back NFL MVP's and this altered the Packers timeline while also giving them a quality asset to groom for the future, or groom for trade.

So, no, Gutekunst does not hate Jordan Love and we shouldn't even joke about something so heinous. What's next? We gonna joke that Chicago has a professional football team??

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

My reasons for sarcasm and my use of it are because this forum is rampant with disinformation.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#22

My reasons for sarcasm and my use of it are because this forum is rampant with disinformation.

Originally Posted by: PackerNation

No, this forum is not rampant with disinformation. I take pride in that this website does not pander to the content for sake of content crowd that's money grabbing and manipulates people while undermining their intelligence. This is a small community of mostly good folks. And I do my best to share quality information, educate and keep the tone quality over quantity. If you're thinking this forum is rampant disinformation, it's because you're taking people's opinions as facts and that my friend is 100% YOUR FAULT and that fault does NOT represent the website. Doing so is as ignorant as faulting the three wheels that work perfectly because one wheel squeaks.

PackersNation
Registered

2 years ago

#23

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

When someone posts that Gute is trying to "sell" J-Love, that is disinformation.

Disinformation are things intended to mislead. I don't believe any of the ignorant BS that is posted here, but that doesn't make it not disinformation.

And I will continue to post sarcasm in reply to it if I see the need. Ban me if you wish.

I don't have much free time, and when I do have a few moments to kill and talk sports on my phone, I have several options to do so.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#24

Originally Posted by: PackerNation

Some one does not equal the entire forum, it equals ONE person. Do you understand? Do you comprehend this? Quit being obtuse and understand this simple concept. People have opinions and if they differ from yours, that does not mean it is disinformation. Amazing how arrogant and narcissist you are. Anyhow, enough of you, you're a tired trick.

Regarding Packers trying to "sell" Jordan Love, who knows? Just because I disagree with it the opinion, doesn't make it disinformation. Maybe Packers know Rodgers will play three more seasons and need to pump up Love to get trade capital? It would behoove the TEAM to do exactly that. So, the thought of trying to overvalue your asset (e.g. player) for compensation is just good business.

That being said. I do not think Packers are trying to prop Love up to ship him off. I think they are just looking at things glass half full.

PackersNation
Registered

2 years ago

#25

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

If it bothers you that I post sarcasm in reply to someone saying that Gute is trying to "sell" J-Love, then we will have a problem. Because I will joke around about those type of posts.

Have a good day you "tired trick."

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#26

Originally Posted by: PackerNation

Regarding Packers trying to "sell" Jordan Love, who knows? Just because I disagree with it the opinion, doesn't make it disinformation. Maybe Packers know Rodgers will play three more seasons and need to pump up Love to get trade capital? It would behoove the TEAM to do exactly that. So, the thought of trying to overvalue your asset (e.g. player) for compensation is just good business.

That being said. I do not think Packers are trying to prop Love up to ship him off. I think they are just looking at things glass half full.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (8h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (16h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (21h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (22h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS