Mucky Tundra
2 years ago


The Green Bay Packers face an interesting dilemma heading into the 2022 season. It concerns the future of Pro Bowl offensive lineman Elgton Jenkins. Because he suffered a season-ending knee injury in November, it is unlikely Jenkins will be ready to start the 2022 campaign on time. But when he does return, do the Packers insert him into the lineup at tackle or a guard?
Jenkins is one of the most versatile offensive linemen in the NFL today. He can play all five positions along the line at a very high level. In college, he played center, guard and tackle during his career. His strong play at Mississippi State led the Packers to draft him in the second round of the 2019 NFL Draft.
Jenkins came close to winning the starting right guard position in training camp as a rookie but was barely beaten out by veteran Lane Taylor. When Taylor suffered a season-ending injury in Week 1, Jenkins stepped in and started for the rest of his rookie campaign.
In 2020, Jenkins won Pro Bowl honors for his strong play at left guard. He demonstrated the ability to run and pass block well and had the speed and agility to get to the second level.
In 2021, Jenkins again proved his versatility. With David Bakhtiari out of the lineup because of a knee injury he suffered late in 2020, Jenkins shifted to left tackle and took over the job of protecting Aaron Rodgers’ blind side.
Despite the position switch, Jenkins continued to play at a very high level. He suffered an ankle injury that cost him three games early in the season but played eight games in total before suffering a season-ending knee injury in the Packers Week 11 game against the Minnesota Vikings.
So, now the question is, when Jenkins is ready to return to the lineup, where do the Packers put him? Do they return him to left guard alongside Bakhtiari who is expected to return to his customary left tackle position? If they do, that will give the Packers two Pro Bowl players on the left side of their offensive line and if both are healthy and return to form, could give the team one of the best duos in the league on the left side.
If Jenkins returns to left guard, then Jon Runyan, Jr. and Royce Newman would likely fight to see who will stay in the starting lineup at right guard with the other player giving the Packers depth along the interior offensive line.
The alternative is to move Jenkins to right tackle where Yosh Nijman will likely compete with an early round draft pick to see who the opening day starter will be after the Packers let go last year’s starter, Billy Turner. Jenkins would strengthen the weaker right side of the offensive line and give the Packers two Pro Bowl offensive lineman at the offensive tackle position.
There is a downside to moving Jenkins to tackle, however. As a rule, tackles are paid more money than guards as the Packers and the rest of the league places a higher value on that position. Jenkins rookie contract expires at the end of the 2022 season. If the team determines that his future is at tackle rather than at guard, Jenkins will almost certainly ask for and will likely receive a bigger contract if the Packers are able to re-sign him for 2023.
Obviously, a lot of things can change the equation between now and the time Jenkins is ready to return to the lineup. He can be ahead of schedule or behind schedule. Other players along the offensive line could also suffer injuries which would make Jenkins’ versatility even more useful. For example, Jenkins may become the primary backup at center if Josh Myers misses significant time next season.
The other players along the offensive line could also exceed expectations or play poorly, changing the team’s need at any position. We also don’t know at this point when the team will add offensive linemen in the draft and how many they will add. If the Packers select an offensive tackle with one of their early picks, they may be more inclined to project Jenkins’ long-term future at guard.
Either way, this is a major decision for the Packers coaching staff and front office. Through three seasons, Jenkins has proven himself to a be a very valuable and talented player who can help the team at a variety of positions. Keeping him in the fold and maximizing that ability is the next task for the Packers organization.

Continue Reading@CheeseheadTV 

CheeseheadTV wrote:



I say RT and roll with Bakh-Runyan-Myers-Newman-Jenkins if everyone is healthy. I also think that any idea of playing Jenkins at guard in hopes of keeping his price tag down is a foolish notion. As long as Jenkins agent isn't a complete moron, he's going to use Jenkins time at LT as a starting point for any contract negotiations because other teams in the league will pony up.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
beast
2 years ago
Considering I think he's going to start the year on the PUP list and miss at least the first 6 games, he should play wherever we need him, as someone might be injured by then.

As for where should we play him if everyone is healthy, he's said he feels most comfortable at LG and all the wide zone teams have invested heavily into their LG with an expensive FA or top two round LG, so they must feel the LG is extremely important I'm the wide zone scheme, so I'd think about keeping him there if everyone is healthy.

I like how Nijman played more than I liked Newman play, though Newman was only a rookie so he potentially could get a lot better.

But if everyone is healthy, I'd be looking at Bakhtiari, Jenkins, Myers, Runyan, Nijman.

But I'd also be adding one or two more OL and at least one of those would be an OT if not both.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
2 years ago
There are a couple of questions in this story. First is were do WE think he should play. That is open for discussion. The second is where WILL he play. We don't know and won't know until after the draft and after the late FA signing period is over.

If the Packers use one of their 1st or 2nd round picks on a OL, it will impact where they see Jenkins playing. If they trade up and grab Evan Neal OT chances are great Jenkins is back at guard. Because of his injury the Packers will be able to sit back and evaluate Runyan and Newman (Even Neal for that matter.) then slip Jenkins into the position with the weakest link. Unless of course they push JRJ from left guard to right guard.

On the other hand if they take someone like Zion Johnson in the 2nd they probably want Jenkins to be their long term RT.

Personally I would like to know how successful Newman is in his second year. It's kind of early to give up on him. 4th round picks don't always become elite lineman but enough of them have done so to merit a second look.

I see Nijman as a steady backup not a long term starter. I don't get a warm and fuzzy feeling knowing Jake Hansen or Cole Van Lanen are in the lineup either. Packers need depth. Taking a couple of OL in the draft is a pretty good idea.

My guess is GB will draft a OG and Jenkins is going to end up at RT.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago
G
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (16h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (17h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.