Greg Jennings.. Long Time Packers?· Page 5

DakotaT
Select Member

15 years ago

Believe it or not, I've actually heard people criticize Jennings for being "too cocky."

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Ridiculous.

"pack93z" wrote:

Honestly, listening to him on the NFL playbook spots that he did.. there was definitely some ego bleeding through..

But on the field and everywhere else.. I haven't seen it.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Oh, that's just showmanship -- the kid's got the gift of gab, he's gonna be a pastor after football. I can honestly say the kid gives me no indication that he's anything but a fantastic receiver and a solid citizen. That's precisely what we need in GB as we roll into the future w/ Rodgers.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Yeah and the best part about him is that he is the reason for the phrase:

"Javon Who"

I've been nothing but pleased with Jennings.

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#42

Yeah and the best part about him is that he is the reason for the phrase:

"Javon Who"

I've been nothing but pleased with Jennings.

"DakotaT" wrote:

Heh. Funny you bring that up.
I was missing Javon at first then Gregorious showed why I'm glad he's no longer with us.

I have no problem with a little bit of ego. I call it "spunk."

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#43

he's gonna be a pastor after football.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Seriously?

Bigbyfan
Member

15 years ago

#44

Greg Jennings is never the guy to have big celebrations after TD's. He either tosses the ball to the ref and does a Lambeau Leap or he gets on one knee and says a little prayer. A classy individual, like the majority of the Packers.

blank

GermanGilbert
Member

15 years ago

#45

"Bigbyfan" wrote:

there's no better way to celebrate a td than with a lambeau leap. i love those handshakes from the secondary after picks, though 🙂

blank

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#46

he's gonna be a pastor after football.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

Seriously?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

yup. what a loser! Why doesn't he get a real job instead?!?!

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#47

I just watched his interview from yesterday and they asked about the contract and he said he would listen to his agent thats why he hired him. They asked him if he might hold out , he said he doubted it but it's always a possibility. It was a very interesting interview and i love how he avoided the Brett vs Rodgers comparisons. And said that Brett was not the reason they lost the games. The media was trying so hard to get a story started.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#48

I must admit it bothers me a tad that he didn't rule out the possibility of a holdout. Sure, right now the chances of a holdout might be only 0.1%, but if he hasn't ruled out that tactic, the chance will steadily increase as the deadline approaches. I'm guessing he'll have an extension or new contract in place before training camp starts, yet even if he doesn't, I hope he elects not to hold out. It's to his advantage, after all, to perform at a high level; that way, if he ends the '09 season without a contract, he can hit the free agency market with an even bigger splash.

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

15 years ago

#49

he's gonna be a pastor after football.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

Seriously?

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

That's what he says, yep.

blank

HoustonMatt
Registered

15 years ago

#50

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

As fans, we hate holdouts, but for a player, a hold out is their only bargaining tool. Why would a player completely rule that out?

I don't often side with players in contract situations, especially if it's one of those "I signed a big 5 yr contract two years ago, but now I want a new one" situations, but if a rookie has severly outperformed his initial contract and expects to be compensated as such, I generally have no problem with it - especially in a game like football where you're always one play away from the end of your career.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (5h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (15h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (15h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (15h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (18h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (18h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (19h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (21h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (21h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (21h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (21h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (21h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (21h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (21h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (21h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS