zombieslayer
16 years ago
Well, now that Aaron's red zone stats have come up, I want to see stats on run/pass % in the red zone.

My guess is we're too dang conservative in the red zone. Aaron has proven he does not turn the ball over. We have one of the best WR sets in the whole freaking league. Let's PASS in the red zone more. Put the ball in Aaron's hands. I trust him. Why doesn't MM? MM 's conservatism is really pissing me off.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
dhazer
16 years ago

Great article, really put the season in sum very well. Can't wait to hear what hazer has to say about that article saying that Rodgers has played well...

"go.pack.go." wrote:



Ok you want to know what i will say is that its just another person with the Rodger goggles on he is a decent qb but yet i like how they say its not any of his fault. I have seen alot of posters doing the same exact thing its always some other part of the teams fault. But yet when you compare rodgers to another qb its always because that qb has a running game or they have a great defense. But like some say it takes 53 guys to win a game and it takes 53 guys to lose a game.


See i didnt even cut Rodgers down.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
go.pack.go.
16 years ago

Great article, really put the season in sum very well. Can't wait to hear what hazer has to say about that article saying that Rodgers has played well...

"dhazer" wrote:



Ok you want to know what i will say is that its just another person with the Rodger goggles on he is a decent qb but yet i like how they say its not any of his fault. I have seen alot of posters doing the same exact thing its always some other part of the teams fault. But yet when you compare rodgers to another qb its always because that qb has a running game or they have a great defense. But like some say it takes 53 guys to win a game and it takes 53 guys to lose a game.


See i didnt even cut Rodgers down.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



Okay, I've discovered you're not as bad as Fred! Haha, +1.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago

Holy smokes! Is Rodgers really that good in the red zone?

Knowing that - it should be our imperative to PASS the ball in the red zone more.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



wpr and I have been saying this for weeks. It makes zero sense to hunker down and run inside the 20 when you have the most accurate, least mistake-prone red-zone quarterback in the league. But we're told that no sane coach would put the ball in the hands of a quarterback like that. I call bullshit, and even if that's true, I think it's unfortunate that NFL coaches have become so tentative. I guess they're more worried about finding ways to absolve themselves of responsibility for close losses than actually winning the games. Say what you want about Gregg Easterbrook, but that happens to be his opinion too.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago

Because when we're 1 yard out, we shouldn't HAVE to pass. We should be able to pound it in.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



So freaking what? Where is the logic on standing stubbornly on some outmoded football philosophy -- "we shouldn't HAVE to pass" -- rather than playing to your strengths and doing what works? Rodgers has tossed 17 touchdowns (68% of his passing TDs) inside the red zone. Obviously that is what works for us. Plus he's run for another 4 TDs, for a total of 21 red-zone TDs -- or 60% of the total TDs scored by the Packers this season.

We've only scored 10 TDs on the ground this year, of which Rodgers himself has punched in 4. I don't understand why McCarthy insists on trying to do something that contributes such a small percentage of our total scoring.
UserPostedImage
TheEngineer
16 years ago

Because when we're 1 yard out, we shouldn't HAVE to pass. We should be able to pound it in.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



So freaking what? Where is the logic on standing stubbornly on some outmoded football philosophy -- "we shouldn't HAVE to pass" -- rather than playing to your strengths and doing what works? Rodgers has tossed 17 touchdowns (68% of his passing TDs) inside the red zone. Obviously that is what works for us. Plus he's run for another 4 TDs, for a total of 21 red-zone TDs -- or 60% of the total TDs scored by the Packers this season.

We've only scored 10 TDs on the ground this year, of which Rodgers himself has punched in 4. I don't understand why McCarthy insists on trying to do something that contributes such a small percentage of our total scoring.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



If you ask me, some of our troubles with short yardage run conversions is the fact that a lot of the time we're giving it to the fullback. I'd much rather give it to a RB or to Rodgers to throw.

Yes, Rodgers has been very, very good in the Redzone. But the Redzone doesn't end 1 yard out. Rodgers has up to around 20 yards to play with. When you get compressed down at the goalline, the window for throws just becomes that much tighter. This is why teams generally run, I would imagine.

What does annoy me are runs on 3rd down and 6 and settling for a field goal. Might as well just kick it on 3rd down.
blank
djcubez
16 years ago

Holy smokes! Is Rodgers really that good in the red zone?

Knowing that - it should be our imperative to PASS the ball in the red zone more.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



wpr and I have been saying this for weeks. It makes zero sense to hunker down and run inside the 20 when you have the most accurate, least mistake-prone red-zone quarterback in the league. But we're told that no sane coach would put the ball in the hands of a quarterback like that. I call bullshit, and even if that's true, I think it's unfortunate that NFL coaches have become so tentative. I guess they're more worried about finding ways to absolve themselves of responsibility for close losses than actually winning the games. Say what you want about Gregg Easterbrook, but that happens to be his opinion too.

"zombieslayer" wrote:


Exactly the reason I like coaches like Singletary. He is not afraid to put his balls on the line as a coach, he'll do whatever it takes to get his team ready, fired up and win. He'll even bench a first-round draft pick. I'm not saying he's amazing as a coach, but his demeanor goes a long way in winning games.
16 years ago
We didn't handle adversity too well this year, but this article is dead on. Lady Luck was laughing at us all season (I call it the Madden Curse, but you say to-may-to, I say to-mah-to). And yes, the Bears game was a perfect microcosm of the year. I was saying that on the phone to other Packers fans all night. I don't think there is a single person in this forum who would've bet that Crosby kick was not going to be blocked or bang off an upright or something, nor would we have bet the Bears FG in OT would miss. It's just a real bad break season.

Why couldn't they have just photoshopped a Jets jersey onto Favre?? :lol:
UserPostedImage
gopackgo212
16 years ago
Ah, I totally agree with everything said here. We are way too conservative.

I believe the Carolina game was a perfect example of this. Tied 28-28 late in the 4th, we had 1st and goal from the 1. Terrible playcalling and we didn't get in. But we made the worst decision when we kicked the field goal instead of going for it. Normally I may not say this, but in this case I knew it was just plain suicide with our brilliant special teams coverage and unstoppable defense vs. the Panthers offense that was rocking us all day. At least go for it, if you don't make it than Carolina gets the ball 99 yards out, and the game is still tied. Instead, I was sure Carolina would just waltz downfield and tie the game with a field goal even with only 2 minutes left.

But it turned out I was wrong, they scored a touchdown instead. (In what, like 3 plays?)
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
Too conservative? That's odd because I can recall quite a few games where the coach is blasted for going deep on 1st and 10.

It's amazing people want it both ways when things don't get executed.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
wpr (1h) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (21h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.