Paul Bretl tweeted this. I like it.



My choices:
Funchess
Heflin
McDuffie
Gaines
Kelly

A few of these are pretty tough to choose.

---

Funchess/Taylor

Lancaster/Heflin

Summers/McDuffie

Gaines/Uphoff

Kelly/Nijman

---

WR Taylor (Funchess is in the IR, and I thought Gute was hoping to trade him even before that)

DT Lancaster AND Heflin... I think we can carry both... if we have to go with just one, then Lancaster is better RIGHT now, but I'm going with Heflin because he has four years before he becomes a vet and Lancaster only has one. Keeping him cheaper for longer and I don't think Lancaster is going to develop more than he has. But ideally both.

LB: Summers/McDuffie... I'm going with more athletic McDuffie, even though Summers is better right now, both because he has more straight line speed and more years of non-vet left. Though I don't think either is going to be much more than a STer.

S: Gaines/Uphoff: Gaines because I think he's currently the better Safety... though Uphoff is better on STs and might have more upside potential

OT: Kelly/Nijman... they both have sucked in pass protection at times... but Nijman can play the left side and has more potential and he's not a veteran contract guy.

---

Out of curiosity I followed the tweet back and looked at the responses:

Funchess 22 1/2 Taylor 15 1/2 (One person wants both of them.)
Sometimes respondents would say either or neither. When that happened I indicate a "0".
Lancaster 2 Heflin 36 (This is the runaway vote.)
Summers 21 McDuffie 16 (2 people voted for both of them. One person voted for neither.)
Gaines 8 1/2 Uphoff 28 1/2. ( A person voted for both. Another voted for neither.)
Kelly 27 Nijman 11 (2 people voted for both.)

---

Yep. That ends this debate and brings on the debate about Taylor vs Winfree. Or both.
My original 53 had 7 WR. Now I am thinking 6.

---