Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago

The Packers are the only team in the NFL with a quarterback, receiver and running back in the top six in all three categories.

Continue Reading @ Sports Illustrated 

Sports Illustrated wrote:



It's slow, and article talks about how good Rodgers, Adams and Jones are. Also Tonyan but he's most average starter.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago
Sternberger could break out too. Lot of talent there.

Do they count AJ Dillon? Hasn't generated stats yet.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago

Sternberger could break out too. Lot of talent there.

Do they count AJ Dillon? Hasn't generated stats yet.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Sternberger looked bad last year to me... of course he was being used more as an H-Back and maybe that's a bad fit for him. But he also made lots of little mentally errors including dropping some of the easiest passes.

I felt like Dugara and Daffney looked better, at least as H-backs. Sternberger might have more potential as a receiving TE, but currently Tonyan is blocking him from getting more snaps in that role.

Dillon has only looked good for one game and Rodgers seemed kinda like they haven't seen that in practice. So I'm unsure what to think of Dillon yet, he's got some good power, but I think they clearly trusted him less than the vets, otherwise he would of been getting more chances in the power spots.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
3 years ago
Sternberger needs another training camp. Not unusual for a TE to take an extra year or two.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
3 years ago
Looking beyond the skilled positions, Bak was the best OT.

At 67.7 Jenkins may not have had a great PFF grade. Factor in it was his second season, played multiple positions and didn't have a real training camp, he was very solid. I can see him taking another step this year.

Don't count on rookies to excel. If there is one, it might be Josh Myers at center. He's got big shoes to fill. Linsley was the best center last year so don't expect him to be THAT good in year 1.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
3 years ago
The problem is, when you start 3 wide outs and two of whoever you put in there are well below average, the coverage can focus on Adams.

With a run first, heavy TE focus 1-2-2, play action and quick release passing mitigates the need for elite depth at wide out.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago

The problem is, when you start 3 wide outs and two of whoever you put in there are well below average, the coverage can focus on Adams.

With a run first, heavy TE focus 1-2-2, play action and quick release passing mitigates the need for elite depth at wide out.

Originally Posted by: KRK 



True, though Lazard has been graded out as the best blocking WR in the NFL... does it really matter if he has the TE or WR label? He can block... which also mitigates the need for elite depth at wide out.

And I believe MVS led the NFL in yards per catch...

So I'm not sure the WRs are so well low below average... especially when Lazard is basically already an extra blocker which you want on the field and you need a deep threat and that's clearly not Adams or Lazard.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (40m) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (45m) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (56m) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (56m) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (1h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (1h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (1h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (2h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (2h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (3h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (5h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (12h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (13h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (19h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (20h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (21h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
25m / Around The NFL / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.