So everyone's on a Vikings forum around here?... Seems kinda suspicious Foster.
Anyway, I'm wondering about what you said, though, Formo.
Your post was made before this weeks game (Week 15), Jackson's rating was horrible and he had thrown for 2 TDs, 1 Int and a 50% Completion rate, after having two season, both under 71 QB rating.
Why would you rather have Jackson, even if Favre would've retired after 2 years? Just because of the ass-whooping in the last couple of years, or do you see some potential in him?