dfosterf
16 years ago
MORE FAIL FAIL FAIL

Read about how the Jags WANTED US TO GO FOR IT AND WHY:

Link:


WE CAN'T MOVE ANYBODY  
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago
I'm still in favor of going it on fourth-and-short 99% of the time.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
16 years ago
I don't know why we ever went to the ZBS but I've said it before and I'll say it again,SHIT CAN IT!
Timmons
16 years ago
I am not in love with the ZBS. What the problem is I do not know. Runner or blockers. I'd guess blockers. What I do know it that our D line is a much bigger liability than our O line.
blank
chibiabo
16 years ago

I am not in love with the ZBS. What the problem is I do not know. Runner or blockers. I'd guess blockers. What I do know it that our D line is a much bigger liability than our O line.

"Timmons" wrote:



:ramboface: Exactly! I cannot understand TT's philosophy here. While speed is of great help, wide bodies and bull strength seem to be the strength of those teams that are currently vying for play-off positions. Without some really nasty bull rushers for the middle of GB's "D" line the rest of the defense has to scramble to stay with receivers and pits lighter weight corners and safeties against some very large, heavy as well as fast RB's. That for me is the major problem with GB's approach.
blank
macbob
16 years ago
This is one where I miss Mike Sherman as coach. I loved the running game we had back then. Lining up in the U-71, everybody knowing we were running it and not being able to stop us anyway.
chibiabo
16 years ago

This is one where I miss Mike Sherman as coach. I loved the running game we had back then. Lining up in the U-71, everybody knowing we were running it and not being able to stop us anyway.

"macbob" wrote:



:whipitgood: Perhaps an injection of some of Lombardi's philosophy is in order as well. In practice you run the play as many times as it's neceessary until the mistakes and errors are eliminated. If it gets dark before that's accomplished, turn on the lights and keep running it until it's perfect. Ahh! The good old days.l Mike McCarthy has a bit too much leniency as far as I can see.
blank
16 years ago
Was it just me or was the second year of the U-71 far more disappointing than it was that first year?

I agree our D-line is a bigger liability than our O-line. Grant got off to a slow start and he still had over 1000 yards in 14 games. I'm hoping Sitton develops into a starter for next year (he's bigger and meaner). I don't think the O-line is a place where you can just bring in guys and it works well out of the gate - consistency is key. Our O-line a number of years back was good because they were together for a while.

Back to the D-line though. If I were GM, I would make it a priority to draft BJ Raji AND pick up Haynesworth. DT has been neglected for too long. We have depth so we can give up draft picks. We have the money. Get 'er done. I want BOTH OF THESE GUYS.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago
Haynesworth just injured his knee. I'm not sold on him for next year.
UserPostedImage
16 years ago
Heard he'll be back for the playoffs. We will have to watch and see how he performs.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (3m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (3m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (11m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (12m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (32m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.