wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago

Gotta be 16 - 0 right now and out scoring opponents by 40.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It would be amazing for GB to be 16-0 after playing only 13 games. I'm all for it.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

1-0 after playing only 13 games.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Quoting to preserve this amazing typo for posterity.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
5 years ago

I don't think it's intentional brakes. I think Rodgers is back to freelancing and our offense looks broke as fuck when he refuses to run it as designed.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



Freelancing how? I hear complaints every year about Rodgers, which are valid here?

HE HOLDS THE BALL TOO LONG AND TAKES UNNECCESARY SACKS - Did that happen this week?

HE CHECKS OUT OF RUNS AND TRIES TO FORCE BALLS DEEP - Sorry, how many deep balls did we chuck? Is 28 passes and 23 runs not pretty balanced? Did we not stick with the run fairly consistently all game long without getting away from it for entire drives?

HE IGNORES THE OPEN RECEIVER - I'm sorry, can you please point out a few plays where someone was clearly open and he didn't get the ball out/forced the ball to someone completely blanketed?

HE DOESN'T RUN THE OFFENSE - This is what it comes down to. You have a feeling, reality must be warped to cover this feeling even if it means having to accept that you personally know more about how the offense is designed to be run, what plays are being called, what the scouting reports say, what interactions are happening between coaches and Rodgers than Rodgers.

The receivers were blanketed all day long. Rodgers was getting the ball out fast when receivers were being given 8+ yards of pad. We checked into run more often than we checked out of it. We didn't force the ball deep on bombs. Most of Rodgers' sacks involved an O Lineman pushed backwards directly into his face within two seconds. Rodgers didn't hold onto the ball for 8+ seconds dancing around trying to wait for someone to get open instead of throwing the ball away.

But nope Rodgers still is to blame and "Isn't running the offense".
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago

Quoting to preserve this amazing typo for posterity.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Thanks I fixed it on my post. Every time I am a smart ass it bites me in the butt.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Quoting to preserve this amazing typo for posterity.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I was curious if Wayne missed my smart-ass tone, or if he was trying to one-up my smart-ass tone, or if it was a typo. My brain started to hurt and I walked away.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago

I was curious if Wayne missed my smart-ass tone, or if he was trying to one-up my smart-ass tone, or if it was a typo. My brain started to hurt and I walked away.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I know you are a smart ass. I was trying to ride the crest of smartdom and had a typo. Thing is I knew the was a mistake in my post I just couldn't see it.
It would have worked out better if I would have said that is what I meant to say.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
5 years ago

Freelancing how? I hear complaints every year about Rodgers, which are valid here?

HE HOLDS THE BALL TOO LONG AND TAKES UNNECCESARY SACKS - Did that happen this week?

HE CHECKS OUT OF RUNS AND TRIES TO FORCE BALLS DEEP - Sorry, how many deep balls did we chuck? Is 28 passes and 23 runs not pretty balanced? Did we not stick with the run fairly consistently all game long without getting away from it for entire drives?

HE IGNORES THE OPEN RECEIVER - I'm sorry, can you please point out a few plays where someone was clearly open and he didn't get the ball out/forced the ball to someone completely blanketed?

HE DOESN'T RUN THE OFFENSE - This is what it comes down to. You have a feeling, reality must be warped to cover this feeling even if it means having to accept that you personally know more about how the offense is designed to be run, what plays are being called, what the scouting reports say, what interactions are happening between coaches and Rodgers than Rodgers.

The receivers were blanketed all day long. Rodgers was getting the ball out fast when receivers were being given 8+ yards of pad. We checked into run more often than we checked out of it. We didn't force the ball deep on bombs. Most of Rodgers' sacks involved an O Lineman pushed backwards directly into his face within two seconds. Rodgers didn't hold onto the ball for 8+ seconds dancing around trying to wait for someone to get open instead of throwing the ball away.

But nope Rodgers still is to blame and "Isn't running the offense".

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



Just so we're clear, everything you just asked for is exactly what Barfan was crucified/suspended/run off this forum for doing.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Freelancing how? I hear complaints every year about Rodgers, which are valid here?

HE HOLDS THE BALL TOO LONG AND TAKES UNNECCESARY SACKS - Did that happen this week?

HE CHECKS OUT OF RUNS AND TRIES TO FORCE BALLS DEEP - Sorry, how many deep balls did we chuck? Is 28 passes and 23 runs not pretty balanced? Did we not stick with the run fairly consistently all game long without getting away from it for entire drives?

HE IGNORES THE OPEN RECEIVER - I'm sorry, can you please point out a few plays where someone was clearly open and he didn't get the ball out/forced the ball to someone completely blanketed?

HE DOESN'T RUN THE OFFENSE - This is what it comes down to. You have a feeling, reality must be warped to cover this feeling even if it means having to accept that you personally know more about how the offense is designed to be run, what plays are being called, what the scouting reports say, what interactions are happening between coaches and Rodgers than Rodgers.

The receivers were blanketed all day long. Rodgers was getting the ball out fast when receivers were being given 8+ yards of pad. We checked into run more often than we checked out of it. We didn't force the ball deep on bombs. Most of Rodgers' sacks involved an O Lineman pushed backwards directly into his face within two seconds. Rodgers didn't hold onto the ball for 8+ seconds dancing around trying to wait for someone to get open instead of throwing the ball away.

But nope Rodgers still is to blame and "Isn't running the offense".

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



You speak the truth here. It’s always Rodgers’ fault though, don’t you know that? Our receivers are the best in the NFL and our QB can’t hit them to save his life.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

You speak the truth here. It’s always Rodgers’ fault though, don’t you know that? Our receivers are the best in the NFL and our QB can’t hit them to save his life.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Whoa, whoa! Our WR's are far from the best. That's some foolish level hyperbole there. We have 1 WR that could be argued into the top 10. The rest are basically edge WR3's or solid WR4's.

Going into this game, the Packers OL was the only one to not give up a sack in under 2.5 seconds. What value does that have? I have no idea, but I remember the previous coach having a 3 second clock in training camp and the goal was to have the ball out before the timer expired.


UserPostedImage
Cheesey
5 years ago
I THINK go pack go was being sarcastic.
At least I THINK he was....
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (16m) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
    dfosterf (22m) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
    Zero2Cool (38m) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
    dfosterf (39m) : Can't find the toggle, lol
    dfosterf (40m) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
    Zero2Cool (45m) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
    dfosterf (1h) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
    dfosterf (1h) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
    dfosterf (1h) : *Friday*
    dfosterf (1h) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
    dfosterf (1h) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
    dfosterf (1h) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
    dfosterf (1h) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
    Zero2Cool (2h) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
    dfosterf (2h) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
    dfosterf (2h) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
    beast (2h) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
    beast (2h) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
    beast (2h) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
    beast (2h) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
    dfosterf (2h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
    dfosterf (2h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
    dfosterf (2h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
    dfosterf (2h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
    beast (9h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    44m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.